Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I have been on several forums and been to hear several option guys speak and none of them run the outside veer? Why? What do you guys think? Is the read to difficult to teach or what.
Split Veer - It depends on where you align the backs. If you align them on an inside shade of the guard it is difficult to run OV unless you modify their alignment. If you align the backs head up or outside shade of the guards it becomes very easy to run.
Flexbone - With the diveback being directly behind the QB, there is a poor angle for the OV.
I ran the isv-osv for long years. I do not see how you run the ISV without running OSV. You question the read difficulty: the real truth, coach, is it is a much EASIER read than the ISV because your reading only the EMLOS. As you know a QB has two reads on the ISV. I really think that the reticence to run OSV much is the trend to run the Load against DE's these days. But, make no mistake, if your going to run the ISV, the OSV is the perfect compliment! Yes, it is susceptable to a lot of different ways to defend it, but if you have a good OL who is coached correctly in the way to BLOCK it against all the various and sundry defensive approaches, you can't beat it in my opinion. Don't get me wrong, there is a time to run load of course, but not all the time!
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
That is what I thought. I love to load the DE, but I believe the OV will mess a defense up. I was just asking, because Carson-Newman quit running the OV. They think the way to attack the c gap is the speed option. I love the OV. could I have your email, so that I can ask you some questions about the OV?
Would not have an offense without the outside veer. I have ran it from the splitback, the i formation, and the flexbone. It puts defenders in a different bind than all the other options. It is a great play from split backs, but a different but effective play from the other formations. It is the best goalline running play going, period! When defenses are plugging backers in a/b gap, it is our go-to play.
Base plays in my offense(No matter what formation) :
Midline
Inside Veer
Outside Veer
COunter Trap
G-Belly
Counter
Toss
The reason why I don't run outside veer anymore is because it doesn't fit into a spread option system. I have read many posts about how it can work, but it really doesn't fit in to what we do. I would rather run Power, where we down block everyone, kick out the contain player with the fullback, and lead the guard up the whole if a team pinches to stop the inside veer than running outside veer. Of course, in due time I can turn into the proverbial woman and change my mind on this topic. Outside veer is a must-do if you run split back veer.
I hope this gave you positive insight for what you were looking.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
I'm not an expert on Veer history, but wasn't the outside veer "invented' to take advantage of the 4 tech DTs in the 50 front? In our philosophy, if a 50 defense is playing with a 5 tech DT, we keep running IV. If he moves to a 4 tech alignment, we are going to run OV. So, versus an odd defense we're going to pair those plays together. Against even and split fronts, we prefer to pair inside veer with some variation of the midline.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
Option Coach, another reason why I do not run outside veer is the blocking vs. a odd stack look. I run spread option now, but when I ran I and split back veer to the TE side, I hated combo blocking, especially vs. a stack. The only way you can run outside veer vs. an odd stack is with a Trey combo. If you have read my posts, I do not teach combo blocking. We teach base blocks, down blocks, veer blocks, pull and lead, trap, scoop, or cutoff blocks. If one player's rule is a base block and another player's rule is a down block and it happens to be on the same defender, then essentially we have what is called a DOUBLE TEAM! I don't like combo blocking-- and as someone who played offensive tackle for six years in high school (my high school coach never let me play any skill position, although I begged, pleaded, and cried), I'm entitled to my opinion on combo blocking!
I hope this answered your question, OC.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
Post by Coach Nicholson on Feb 21, 2006 14:11:50 GMT
Lou,
What is it you dont like about combo blocking? In highschool my coach never taught us combo blocking and now that I have learned about combo blocking I wonder what they were thinking.
John, I believe in absolutes. I want my linemen to know that THIS IS THE GUY WHO YOU HAVE TO BLOCK, NOW GO MAKE IT HAPPEN! Over the last few years, I have mentioned my dislike of zone blocking at the high school level. I am a HUGE advocate of veer blocking and wing-t blocking. We coach at a level where we do not get to choose the types of athletes made available to us. Because of this, I must assume year in and year out that my athletes could not block an artery. Thus, I use blocking schemes that are simplistic and efficent from a mental and physical approach. Down blocking, veer blocking, and double teams are blocks that I use. I minimize base blocking at the point of attack as much as I possibly can. The triple option is my favorite system, because we are not blocking two people. Often we are not blocking two defensive linemen. As an offensive line coach and a former offensive line player this simplifies blocking mentally and physically because we can now avoid basing at the point of attack. Don't get me wrong-- I played and I currently coach in the Coal Region in Pennsylvania. Being a tough guy and a man's man is how I was raised. I believe in having extremely physical practices where we test our manhood on a daily basis. However, base blocking at the point of attack is something that is not efficient, unless a coach is able to recruit linemen who can do that. Most of us cannot, thus I believe in Wing-T and Veer Blocking.
Combo blocking is something that I avoid because it is not an absolute.
I hope this made you understand, John.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
Hey Lou, it took you SIX years to get through high school? Your not the sharpest tack in the box, eh? Oh well, a SIX YEAR DIPLOMA IS STILL BETTER THAN NOT HAVING ANYTHING I GUESS. Hehehehe, just ragging on you, relax!
Jerry
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
What techniques do you like to see on the line? For example, midline a 3 tech. is great, and inside veer a 1 and 5 are great.
Do you always run it to a TE, or do you prefer to do so?
What do you do if you get a head up lineman on the TE? Check to a better play? I would assume that you block him down and read the OLB, but I'd like to hear your responses.
Captain, when I DID run it, I liked it vs. a pinching 4 technique or a 4i technique. I DID not like it vs. an odd stack look whether it would be the modern-day 3-5 or an old-fashioned 5-3 stack.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
Post by Coach Nicholson on Feb 21, 2006 19:15:37 GMT
Lou,
I am all for simplicity and giving the kids a rule to hang their hat on. However, I feel that by telling the kids they have a certain defender no matter what, you may be leaving them vulnerable to slanting/stunting defenders. When I was in high school my line coach (who started on a national champion team at Marshall) pounded into our heads that if we take the CORRECT steps our path will take us to the defender we should be blocking. He did not teach us combo blocking but he did teach us how to chip and scoop block.
The reason I wish he would have just gone ahead and taught us full combo blocking is b/c we had trouble against defenses that did a lot of moving around. I remember back to our 2nd game of my senior season when we played a team that did a ton of stemming and then slanted and stunted like wild men after the snap. We normally just lined up and pounded ppl but this team put us into a tailspin! Those awful memories of being confused and not knowing who to block are the main reasons why I now love the idea of combo blocking.
Im not saying you are wrong b/c as you know we all have our beliefs. I also love the idea of lining up and smashing ppl off the ball with man blocking but I feel that if executed properly combo blocks will help us negate a team who is good at stunting and blitzing. Combo's "Clean up the Trash"! Why do most high school offenses struggle??...IMO it is the inability to pick up the blitz.
You want a team to stop blitzing. Run the triple option. Coach Campbell has a saying about blitzing vs. a triple option team. "You might stop us once, you might stop us twice, you might stop us three times, but the fourth time we're going 85 yards for a touchdown." If you blitz an option team, your linebackers will over-run the dive, not be able to get out there on the keep, and it limits the pursuit angles if the ball is pulled. Ok, now we've solved that problem.
You want a team to stop slanting. Run the triple option out of a double slot formation. Now, where are they going to slant? You are not giving them a strong side by which to slant. If they want to play Russian Roulette by slanting to a predetermined side, fine. They might stop you once, they might stop you twice, they might stop you three times. The fourth time, they are going to slant themselves out of a play where you go 85 yards for a touchdown. Now, you may ask if they are going to slant to the motion. If you run two step motion pre-snap, the defense has no time to adjust. I've coordinated offenses and I've coordinated defenses. You cannot tell your athletes to adjust to quick motion like that, because by the time they call out motion, the ball is snapped. Ok, now we've solved that problem.
John, it's a preference I have based on playing and coaching experience. You have me misunderstood. I AM AVOIDING HAVING OUR ATHLETES TO HAVE TO BASE BLOCK SOMEONE AT THE POINT OF ATTACK. We use rule blocking to prevent confusion. We don't line up and block the guy in front of us by ourselves very often, if ever. Our system is based on down blocking, double teams, veer releasing to the linebackers, pulling, trapping, scoop blocking, and cutoff blocking. My athletes are going to be absolutely sure who they are to block on every, single play. If they block the wrong defender, that's their fault. We can lead our athletes to water... once we do that, it's their turn to figure it out!
Combo blocking is something that MANY people do. It's just something that I know is difficult to do unless you are a FULL ZONE BLOCKING TEAM. I do not coach ZONE BLOCKING. The man who runs this board can teach Zone Blocking at the high school level as well as anyone. He knows how I feel about zone blocking, and he's battled with me on it; however, it is not the best way to go at the high school level, because of the skill involved.
Feel free to rebut, John. I said we had to have more intense discussions on this board in an earlier post today, and now we have one. Hope all is well. Take care.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
Outside veer is a great play and is easier to run than inside veer IMO.We run it out of Flexbone or wing/slot.We run it to the TE or away.I like to run it vs. a defense that reduces down the backside(1-tech/5-tech with the OLB either on the line or off.We double the 5-tech to ILB and read OLB for dive/keep.It confuses the defense who assigns people to dive/keep.Some defenses tell the OLB he has pitch and he will run to pitch back like a bat out of hell when option comes his way and the FB runs for big yards.If the OLB tackles dive,pull and pitch off of CB,crack with the SE on FS running the alley.Great play!Compliment it with Inside veer and Midline and you have 3 tough plays to defend.Don't forget PLAY ACTION!
Our rules on all VEERS is double team at the point of attack.If we are running outside veer and we get a 5-tech,the tackle and the man outside of the tackle (TE or SB)will double the 5-tech.If the 5-tech disappears inside the TE/SB will continue to LB;COMBO.If 5-tech goes outside,straight double team.We try to teach our O-line to drive the defender straight back into the scraping LB.If they can't get this,it is up to the FB to make the cut if he gets the ball.As always,I have cut-ups if anyone wants to trade.I am always looking for a better way or more efficient way to do things.lotiefs@bellsouth.net
Post by Coach Nicholson on Feb 21, 2006 20:19:48 GMT
Lou,
Im not trying to be argumentitive in any way. Im merely stating my opinion on combo blocking and stating why I believe in the things that I do.
I understand what the triple option does for you and that is why it is my offense of choice. It puts defenders in a bind and keeps them from guessing. We do agree on that!
I didn't misunderstand you in any way. You stated that you like physical play such as man blocking and I said I enjoy the same. We both understand that man blocking is very difficult and that is why we both teach the blocking styles that we use.
You teach down blocks, pulling and so on to keep your kids from having to execute MAN blocks. I believe in teaching Combo blocking for the same exact reason!
I really see no disagreement here. We both do what we do for the same exact reasons. We just take 2 different paths on our way to the same desired result.
I guess we have another semantics issue again. My playing career did include junior high ball. I should have clearly stated that I played offensive tackle in grades 7-12.
But, since we're ragging on the young guy, I'm going to have my fun ragging on Grandpa Easton (AKA Big Poppa Easton).
Coach Easton, You're so old that your MEMORY is black and white.
You're so old that you went to high school with FRED FLINTSTONE.
You're so old that you took your driver's test on a DINOSAUR.
So much for my big post on professionalism... I just created a paradox. We'll have to start talking football again after this post.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
John, you said it best when you said that "We just take two paths on our way to the same desired result." If everybody did things the same way, this wouldn't be the Jerry Campbell Board. It would be the Jerry Campbell CULT! Nice talking the option, as always.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
quote: John, you said it best when you said that "We just take two paths on our way to the same desired result." If everybody did things the same way, this wouldn't be the Jerry Campbell Board. It would be the Jerry Campbell CULT! Nice talking the option, as always.
Now that would be dangerous !!!!!
I too believe in zone blocking. I learned it that way when I played and it was tremendously easy to remember. You simply take your path and block whoever shows up. Therefore I like to teach it that way as well. Football would be boring if everyone did things the same way. I like diversity. There is more than one way to skin a cat.
Back to OV. I heard Frank Lenti speak at a clinic and to reiterate what was already stated. OV is the best play to run on the goalline if you are a split veer team.
do you feel that outside veer and the belly g option are both necessary to attack the defense? Do you use them to attack the same type of defensive action or do they have their own unique advantages?
want to make sure I am understanding you correctly. You said you like to run power when teams are squeezing against your inside veer. Now if I am picturing a 5 tech to the open side that keeps squeezing our inside veer, wouldn't he create the same problems on power where you are trying to kick out with the FB? I know you can log him and wrap the guard around, but unless I am missing something, the squeezing of the ends is causing the same problem here. Please elaborate further on what you meant.
How could a guy who is lined up on the offensive tackle pinching down cause problems when the play is being run off-tackle? We are kicking out the next player past him, which is the outside linebacker/invert/overhang player. I refer to this player as the contain player. Our slot is going to block down on the pinching 5 tech. The 5 tech. will be taking himself out of the play.
It sounds like you thought we would kick out the 5 tech. We are not kicking out the 5 tech, we are having the slot block down on him and we are having the fullback kick out the contain player with the backside guard leading up the hole.
I hope this clarified everything.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
I'll tell you what... my body right now feels like I played 15 years of high school football! The worst of it is, I never got to play any other offensive position other than offensive tackle. I think that's really depressing.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
I like the belly-g because it is a no read play for the qb. That means if we want to take pressure off the qb we can run this play. It is good from any formation against any defense.
I also feel this is a power football play with option action. There is a down/down/kick.
We also do not like to run outside veer against a c-gap defensive end. We will skin the te around to the inside lb and run the belly-g.
We reverse out on counter trap and the belly-g. i think these two are compainion plays that are difficult to read by the inside lb's. If he is climbing to get to the belly-g, he will get sealed on the counter trap.
Hope this helps. Once the footwork is installed byt the qb, it is not a rep intensive play. The footwork for the fb are exactly the same.
you were right, I was assuming you were kicking out the end man on the l.o.s.
What are your base rules for Power? Do you always block the 5 down with the slot or is that an adjustment made because he is pinching so much.