Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I was wondering if anyone has a system in place for running all three of the above triples. We often will pair midline and IV, or IV and OV, but I have struggled trying to come up with a way to enable the QB at the LOS to recognize and call the most appropriate triple option. Kind of a triple-option-option-on-me concept.
I would love to discuss the possibilities of something like this.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
We do exactly what you are talking about. The BASIC way we do it is this...
(1) We call the option to one side
(2) If there is a 3-tech, then we run midline
(3) If there is no 3, then we find #2
(4) If #2 is off the line, then we run ISV
(5) If #2 is on the line, then we run OSV
Of course, there are variations to it, but that's the general idea.
And, again, just our way of doing it...not the only way.
Carson-Newman runs midline and veer out of split backs. Simply add the outside veer, and now you can do all of this out of one formation. Coach Nicholson will be at the C-N clinic this weekend. LET'S HOPE HE CAN TAKE GOOD NOTES FOR US (HINT, HINT)!
Carson-Newman does not run the outside veer. They run speed option instead.
If you are looking for a system to run these three plays "on me" I would suggest the following:
Run midline vs. a 2 or 3 technique.
Run outside veer vs. a 5/9 technique (Coach Campbell runs load with this, but the old fashioned outside veer guys only run OV when the defense has a defender on the tackle and on the tight end.
Run veer vs. anything else.
Coach, try it out on paper and see if it works. Then, get back to me and tell me what you think. I hope I helped you.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
All three plays need to be in your attack.If QB can't decide,you decide for him.Line up your team on the L.O.S. let the defense line up,and signal in the play.I let my QB call 75% of the plays,especially option plays.Actually,the O-Line called a lot of the plays.
I coach at the high school level.Yes we do have pre snap reads.This is determined in film session during the week.We like to run Midline to a 3-tech,inside veer to and away from the TE,(1 tech,5-tech away and 3-tech,6-tech to the TE) and outside veer to and away from the TE (to a 7-tech to the TE and a 1-tech 5- tech away).Sometimes,we will run certain plays at certain defenders.We want to run inside veer at DT #35 because he runs up the field or run Outside veer at #45 because he squeezes and we can get the ball on the perimeter.These are examples.
Thanks for your answer. How do you go about having your OL call a play at the LOS, or how do you determine PSL reads in pregame planning session? PLEASE DO NOT GET ME WRONG! I AM NOT BEING ARGUMENTATIVE, JUST TRYING TO SEE HOW YOU THINK. As a long time HC/QB Coach/Off. Coord. I always teach the QB must have COMPLETE CONTROL OF THE TEAM AT THE LOS, NOONE ELSE. How do you teach your QB's to adjust if they are seeing something other than what the film has shown in there PSL reads? How do you know that some OL and the QB are reading the same thing, and if not, who prevails in the play called? Thanks for your time in advance.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
I will use an example for you.Lets say we called inside veer from the sideline.As the team approaches the L.O.S. and gets set,our O-tackle notices the DT in a 4i.He calls out "4i,4i,Check,Check."If the QB acknowledges the call,he will change the play to Outside veer.If the QB doesn't acknowledge the call,inside veer is on.The QB has final say.
Most teams we play aren't very multiple defensively.They will give us maybe two - three different fronts and maybe three covereages,so we know ahead of time what plays we want to run against certain fronts.We consider secondary coverages second.The defenses we see might limit our play calling(might take away Midline,Inside Veer,or Outside Veer)but can't stop them all.We attack personnel 1st or fronts,then secondary.We take what the defense gives us.
We are not world beaters by any stretch.We have steadily improved though.We are 26-9 over the last three years and have made it to the 2nd round of the playoffs three consecutive years.We still have a long way to go but we do feel the option game is an equalizer for us.
Post by Coach Nicholson on Mar 1, 2006 9:50:04 GMT
Coach Lo,
You have a very interesting way of checking into plays and it sounds like you are doing very well with it. I have to go with Coach Easton on this one though, I want my QB to have complete control of what is going on at the LOS. To be honest im not sure my normal OT's can spell their name let alone check into plays. lol
Thanks for the insight. We do have a QB that can read, and generally we have followed the traditional guidelines for calling certain options, i.e we'd rather run IV to 1 tech, midline to the 3 tech, etc. Last year we added the OV whereas before we always coupled midline and IV. I'm looking for a simple way of allowing my QB to get us in the best triple.
kc361: I'm assuming that when you mention looking for #2 (on or off) you are counting from the inside out? If so, how do you count the various stack defenses?
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
I think I can save you ALOT OF TIME over your procedure for having an OL go through the technique you just outlined. I just put this out there for your perusal, but this is the way I have always ran it:
In the PSL, if your QB is looking at a 50 front, his first read is always going to be the first man outside the B hole, usually the DT who will align in a 4i-4 -5 tech. (talking ISV here now). IF THE QB, IN HIS PSL, SEES THE DT IN A 5, IT BECOMES AN AUTOMATIC GIVE TO THE DIVE BACK! NO MORE READING NECESSARY, RUN THE PLAY! IF HE READS THE DT IN A 4i, IT BECOMES AN AUTOMATIC PULL! NO MORE READING NECESARY BECAUSE HE HAS TAKEN AWAY THE DIVE BACKS LANE!!! WHY WASTE TIME READING A 5 TECH ON THE SNAP? THERE IS NO 5 TECH IN THE LAND, ESPECIALLY IN THE HS RANKS WHO CAN CLOSE THE B GAP BEFORE THE DIVE BACK IS THROUGH IT. iF HE ISN'T THEN YOU HAVE THE WRONG DIVE BACK, IMO. The DT who plays your guy head up in 4 TECH IS THE GUY WHO KNOWS HOW TO DEFEND THE ISV, becasue your QB is now forced to make a decision on the snap and not before. A pinching 5 tech has never ever hurt us that I can remember of, ever. Plus you do not alert the D that a change is coming by verbalizing. I have always coached that the backs, the QB, and the OT read in the PSL and know what to expect on the snap!
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Added thought: A well coached defense going up against an option team can often dictate, simply by formation and alignment, who they want to have the ball. It is your job to get it in the hands of the best of the 3, (Q, DB, Pitch back) by FULLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE D IS TRYING TO DO TO YOU.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Snap Decisions is a book written by Bill Hollenbeck. He coached HS football in Michigan for years. He starts out by describing what his system is. He said one of the biggest things he wrestled with while running the Split Back Veer is that he could never be assured of calling the right play. At best it is an educated guessing game. Therefore he developed an audible series he called "T-Reads" that combined the essential plays of the offense. He would just establish/install the read series at the beginning of the year, and he would let his QB call plays at the line using the system. He of course could always call a certain play, but at times he would just tell the QB - "Run the T-Reads."
at my previous job, we were a spead bone team, and we rean ML to a 0 tech or a 3 or wider....iv still went off of the outside leg of the guard...and ov attacked off of the inside leg of the tackle....we never ran ov versus an odd because it was two quick reads for the qb(dive and keep)....ml was our attitude play that turned out being a qb isolation play when we lead with the playside back.....in my oinion ml veer is the best football play becasie it combines a quick hitter...deception...and power.....
Tiger: So, in terms of calling the play, would you call IV in the huddle and then audible only if the defense dictate? In combining all three plays, I had thought of having the QB call something like "triple option right, check with me" then go to the LOS and call the best option from there. But I can also see the benefits of calling IV in the huddle and then it becomes an "unless" rule. We're going to run IV unless...
I understand what your saying about the odd front 4i, 4, and 5 tech. By giving the QB an auto give rule vs. a 5 tech, or auto pull against a 4i, it really eliminates the need for other plays to check to.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
I like your ideas with the playcalling system. Two questions. How have you worked against defenses that decide to shift once they figure out your tackles are helping make calls? And secondly, how have you guys handled LB's that have figured out your call and audible system? Our coach has been looking during the offseason of putting all of them together, so your info is very helpful.
We call an ISV in the huddle ( our call would be: 1-rip, 30 dive option, on 2, ready break CHECK WITH ME. At the LOS the QB, EITHER STAYS WITH THE HUDDLE CALL OR CHECKS TO ANOTHER PLAY. I HAVE ALREADY GIVEN HIM A CHOICE OF TWO RUNNING PLAYS OTHER THAN THE HUDDLE CALL, HE CAN CHECK TO AND HE HAS TO STAY WITHIN THOSE TWO.
By having preset give or pull keys to read, it is just so much more expedient without any verbalizing.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
To answer your question about what I would call vs. a zero and a 3 tech? Midline is good, of course, as it is the easiest to read as pointed out in post above. But, I would not rule out ISV either. We would just scoop the nose and slide to Mike, deuce the 3 with the G & T and slide the tackle to the Sam. Base the DE with the TE.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
We have gone against stemming defenses before.Every play that we have,we can run against just about any defense.As you know,certain plays are better than others.I think the outside veer is great vs.a 4i.It is still a good play vs a 5 technique.so a team that stems is guessing and if they have to guess against us,they are scared.They will guess right but they will also guess wrong.We will call a play in the huddle and run it on 1st sound to stop the stemming,or we get unbalanced and force the defense into its one or two unbalanced defenses it will play.No one has figured out our audible system yet.It is rather simple yet effective.We use #s and or names for our checks.Another thing we do is check to the play already called in the huddle.This keeps the defense honest and thinking.They will stem the front and we run the play no matter what they end up in,sometimes they are right,sometimes they are wrong!E-mail me and I will discuss this in greater detail.Too many SPIES!!!!