Fullback's Veer Path (I form)

Coaches,

If you run the ISV to a 1 tech as your aiming point or to the A gap at all, then it is not a veer. It is a dive!
The very name VEER is the key word here and a dive angle and a veer angle are two entirely different angles of attack. If they stack the Mike up tight in a 10 tech right off the noses butt and put the BSDT in a 1 tech, and then you try to run the A gap? IMO, you won't get your 3.5 yds per carry very consistently. Just my opinon as always.

My phiolosophy on what brings more wins:

1. TO HAVE MORE SUPERIOR PLAYERS THAN YOUR COMPETITON!

2. TO HAVE THE BEST SPECIAL FORCES IN YOUR LEAGUE!

3. TO AVOID TURNOVERS AT ALL COSTS!

4. TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THAT YOUR QB, YOUR PUNTER, AND YOUR PLACE
KICKER ARE THE THREE MOST IMPORTANT PLAYERS, AND IN THAT ORDER, ON YOUR ROSTER!

5. TO INSURE THAT THE ENTIRE TEAM, STAFF ARE TOTALLY DEDICATED TO THE NUMBER ONE GOAL
OF WINNING!

Coach Easton

Keep the fullback running at the outside hip of the guard as it disappears inside (guards hip). Coach Campbell

Coach Campbell - so are you saying his path bends back to the inside as the OG and C combo the nose?

Coach Easton - I am calling it inside veer because we are considering tweaking the inside veer a little bit (inside hip of guard) to whatever you want to call it (if we decide to tweak it). The dive and pitch reads would be the same. The blocking would be the same.
We will call it 13/14 option. I am just using IV as a description of the type of option we are running, as it is not midline, and I do not know the other terms.
Anyway, what kind of option would you run at a 0 tech. I thought the inside veer was created to combat the 5-2 okie defense?

Inside Veer reads the 5 technique so vs an odd front you should get a combo to a 5-2 scheme by the guard and center to the backside linebacker. The full back would run off the butt of the guard and off the inside release of the offensive tackle to playside linebacker. Coach CAmpbell