Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Does anyone out there run a 1 back offense w/ the running game based from the option (midline, IV, Speed Option)?
Formations include 4 wide and 3 wide w/ a TE...
What are the advantages/disadvantages of a 1 back set vs. a 2 back set?
Because the FB is @ 4 1/2 yds, does that limit you on what other run plays you can run? Seems it would be hard to run the IZ/OZ Stretch plays...
Are you talking out of the gun or under center? We did that a lot this year. Our game plan was to spread people out and look for mismatches and get our playmakers the ball in space. Although I don't think we executed it as well as we had hoped to, we did score a lot of points. We scored more offensive points vs the best team in our district than anyone else has all year. That team is playing in the state championship this week. We are planning on using it some more next year. I think it is a nice addition to the two back options. It makes the defense adjust, and hopefully change option responsibilities. We don't run any true zone plays, but we can run toss sweep, lead, power, and counter with our QB as the main ball carrier (TB). We didn't do it much this year because we had no backup QB and our #1 was already taking enough shots. A 2 back set usually puts the defense in their "base" and makes them comfortable, in my opinion. With different formations, they have to adjust, while your techniques stay the same.
I am referring to under center...we are also a spread gun team, however with the caliber of teams we face, option football makes more sense for us...anytime you can leave one or two of their better players alone and read them is a good thing...
I was hoping someone out there bases their run from a 1 back under center option game....would like to get their perspective on some things...
We like to run out of double-tight ace. We try to run just enough speed option to keep the defense honest. We option the #2 man form the sideline. The play-side WR must be able to account for the CB. We have two main compliment plays: 1) a reverve to the WR who "intercepts" the pitch and goes off-tackle or outside the other way 2) a pass where the QB comes down the line like he is running the option for three steps, drops back two steps, then hits either the front-side WR on a deep sideline route or the back-side WR on a deep post.
This series is good against pesky, blitz-happy teams.
Steve Logan the former coach at East Carolina did this. He was there for around 10 years and had a fusion of one back zone, option (mainly a speed or lead option-only double), and a spread passing attack. One year they would have a great runner, one year a great passer, some years both. Usually played with one TE or no TE's. David Garrard now of Jax Jags played in this offense as did .... forgot his name, but the year Miami fell apart with Wannstedt, the back they had that starte the first few games and was tearing the place up (Williams had grassed out and someone else was hurt) until an injury was also in this offense. He had a 90 yard run. Was only 6 ft 195 and tore up his knee early.
Greg the Amature
All things work for the good to those who love Him.
Just yahooed him. He is doing radio in Raliegh/Durham, NC (WDNC-620) and OC for a NFL Europe team. You could probably contact him through the station.
Greg
All things work for the good to those who love Him.
Thru the use of MOTION - you can run just about ANY option from a 1 Back as you can from a 2 Back (AND in the 1-Back, there is always a greater stretch on the defense & pass threat).
The SPEED (down the line) option is the simplest way to go from a 1-Back!
As to the FB being 4 1/2 yds - you can deepen him to 5 1/2 & run most of the other 1 Back runs (it doesn't affect the Counter & Inside Zone, although it is a LITTLE tight for the Outside Zone, but you can still run it). In the "glory years" of the Redskins - RIGGINS' ran those plays with his heels at 5 1/2. See article by Bill Walsh below:
TAKEN FROM BILL WALSH LECTURE AT 2003 AFCA CONVENTION
" I’ve notice a lot of coaches place the tailback at nine yards depth, even at eight and sometimes seven. We know that the tailback from that position can cut back or bend outside. The tailback has some options as he’s viewing the blocking in front of him. But we also know that the tailback has at least three or four more steps to take before he gets to the line of scrimmage. So the offensive lineman or lead back have to hold their blocks that much longer.
With that in mind, PROBABLY THE BEST RUNNING GAME I HAVE SEEN IN ALL OF FOOTBALL WAS THE REDSKINS WITH JOHN RIGGINS. His heels were at five-and-a-half yards depth. He would counter step if he needed to allow time for the pulling people to get in front of him. But what we do is give up three or four steps to linebackers’ pursuit if we line up especially deep.
I suggest that you run the same exact plays with your tailback five-and-a-half yards deep. If he needs to, he can counter step to allow blocking to form. But we don’t allow linebackers to get full pursuit on us. We don’t allow people to have three or four steps movement as we take three or four steps farther to get to the line of scrimmage”.