Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Aside from the aiming point of the RB, the initial difference is the read key (or dive key). On ISV, the read key is the 1st DL on/outside the PST (what some teams call #1). On OSV, the EMLOS is the read key. In some defenses, this player is #1. In some defenses, this player is the 1st defender outside #1 (what some teams call #2). A secondary difference is the pitch key. On ISV, the pitch key is typically the 1st defender stacked/outside #1 (again, some teams call this player #2). On OSV, the pitch key is typically a DB (SS in sky support or the CB in cloud support).
Here are two examples...
(1) ISV to the SE side of a Splitback Pro Set vs. a 50. The dive key is the DT (#1) and the pitch key is the DE (#2). Some option teams would zone block with the OL, except the PST who would "loop" the DT to the scraping PSILB.
(2) OSV to the TE side of a Splitback Pro Set vs. a 50. The PST and TE combo the DT (#1) to the PSILB. The dive key is the DE (EMLOS) and the pitch key would be the force player (SS in sky support, CB in cloud support). Most times, this leaves the ball carrier (typically the QB or RB) 1-on-1 with the alley player (FS).
Right now we are planning on running outside veer as a complement / brother to ISV vs a 5 front. If the DT is pinching, we will run OSV, if the DT is taking C gap, we will run ISV. We plan to run it about half the time from one back.
If you run the ISV, then the OSV is a natural progression to any good option team. However, depending upon how the defense is playing your OSV, don't forget your Lead Load as a great alternative.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
One of the main differences, in my opinion, is that the ISV is run in the B gap, and the OSV is designed to exploit from the C gap outward. Like todays popular stretch play, the OSV gets the defense moving and does not allow them to stay compacted against the run to the perimeter.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
So basically, OV has to or needs to be ran to a TE...identicle to IV, just out one gap...
So vs. a 4-3, Read key is the 9 Tech...and we better be in TE Trips if in one back so we can block the pitch man since this is a double opt...
vs. 4-4 split...are we caving down the 7 tech? and reading the stem player? otherwise this would be IV if we arc the TE...or do you not run OV vs. this front?
You are correct in your assumptions. I, personally, chose not to run it against a 4-4 opting to audible at the LOS to a pass with 8 in the box that the 4-4 affords the defense.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Just a little different take on defining Outside Veer and Inside Veer. I basically agree with everything that has been written. Here is my "Yea, BUT!" and speakng from experience as either a full house wishbone coach or a one back spread such as Navy versus a 4-4 defense even though the Fb's path is B gap the play is Outside Veer. The reason is that the defense has aligned 4 defenders inside B gap; the two Dt's and the two Mikes. In my opinion the alignment of the defense has almost as much to do with what Triple you're running as the the gap that the Fb is attacking. By removing a defender from the perimeter I think that the 4-4 is a defense that can be exploited.
We used the Midline(both Doubledive and regular) to compliment the Triple vs the 4-4 along with either Sally or Counter Iso as counters.