Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
TWO! However - keep as many TECHNIQUES as similar as possible.
For example - when we tighten down our basic 4-4 (for WHATEVER reason - be it vs. BIG O-Line splits, Goal Line, etc.) - only 4 people out of 11 play a DIFFERENT technique (& the DE's already learned it on the split end side of BASE)!
ALSO: we may (out of base 4-4) SHADE a DT - which gives a new look, but only ONE man moved.
Coach Fishbone, in my opinion there are only 2 fronts..One is Odd,and the other is Even....I would decide on a Base, and have innovations(stems/slants/etc) off of it.....When you run multiple looks, you have 2 be sure that your Concepts to what you are Teaching are the same....Its not what you know, it's what you can get your kids to understand.......:rose;
A great HS coach once advised me to have ONE zone coverage (any), & ONE way of playing man!
It is hard as hell to teach the technique differennce in zone AND man - let alone having more than one way to play each! This is perhaps the HARDEST single thing to teach in the game of football.
I think that is correct. I think in sixteen games last year, we played a total of 4 coverages. The first was man with no free safety. The second was man free. The third was 2 deep. The forth was 3 deep. I like to play around with changing what we look like pre-snap and the coverage we actually play. I think that is one way to disguise what you are doing in the secondary. We will either line up in a 3 deep look or a 2 deep look and play any one of those 4 coverages. I feel this has been successful for us. I do tend to lean on man coverage because I think it is easier to teach man coverage than zone. Also, we like to blitz and bring pressure from everywhere.
On the topics of fronts, there is only 2. An odd front and an even front. How you accomplish those can vary. All of my fronts stem off of the 4-3. We basically have a base front, Nose-1 shade, Tackle-3 tech, Bull End-6 tech, End-5 tech. A "G" front, Nose-2 inside, Tackle-3 tech, Bull End-6 tech, End-5 tech. I then have 2 others where the Sam linebacker or Will linebacker will roll up on the line of scrimmage and play from there. It gives us a fifty look. Just some thoughts.
In this day and time, I have always thought that you had better have as many as is NECESSARY to stop the offense. When teams lined up in the same formation for the night, one or two were sufficient, I totally agree. But, lets say your a base 5-2 team and you come against a guy like me who ran a 3 x 2 spread, I'll guarantee there is no way in that hot place you are going to cover 5 wides spread from side line to side line in the PSL , in a base 5-2. Even on the high school level offenses are getting a lot more sophisticated and the once prevelent theory of 6 or 8 plays being enough, IMO, is not enough. You have to be able to handle multiple FORMATIONS, not JUST various looks of the SAME formation. My opinion as always. I KNOW COACH lOMBARDI JUST RAN A HANDFUL OF PLAYS, BUT THE GAME HAS EVOLVED FAR BEYOND THAT, in my opinion. For example, your not going to stop an inside zone play the same way your going to stop a misdirection play, just as your not going to defend a smash route the same as you do 5 verticals. You better have a good diversification.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE