Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by Coach Campbell on Jun 30, 2018 16:28:31 GMT
Jason Hylland
The option on me works by giving the quarterback the ability to put the offensive line in the best blocking scheme possible for a more successful play. The goal is to keep the quarterback's reads simple. The play call is predicated on the number of defensive players vs offensive players based on the location of outside inverts and end man on the line of scrimmage. For example, if there is no invert outside the open side (opposite the TE), then the quarterback will take the best option that way. The defense is outnumbered 4 to 3 on that side. If the quarterback sees an invert to the open side, he would want to take the best option towards the TE because he has better numbers to that side (5 to 4). The three options the quarterback can check into on the line of scrimmage based upon defensive alignment are inside veer, midline, and load option. You only run the veer to the open ended side, the midline to the TE versus a 2 or 3 technique, and the load option to or outside the TE.
The pros of giving the quarterback the ability and freedom to call best option on the line of scrimmage is that if he makes the right call, the offense always has a numbers advantage and the defense is always wrong while forcing them to cover the entire field. The quarterback can also check out of plays on late shifts by the defense. The cons to giving the quarterback the ability and freedom to call best option on the line of scrimmage is indecisiveness that could lead to more negative yardage plays or the defense toying with the offensive coordinator and baiting him into calling a play and then they shift late. So for example, a DT that shows a 3 technique early could shift to a 1 technique late and you are now running midline into a 1 instead of 3.
Where I was recently coaching, we had a similar system with the QB but in a 4 wide spread uptempo scheme. We would always call two plays, typically a run and a pass and the quarterback would pick the best play based on leverage and numbers. For example, if we got a five man box, we would run it since we outnumbered the defense 6-5 (5 offensive linemen plus 1 running back). If the defense was adamant of keeping 6 in the box, we would throw it as we always believed our 4 receivers can beat their 5 DB's trying to cover sideline to sideline and down the field.
Post by Coach Campbell on Jun 30, 2018 16:28:55 GMT
Matthew Tesoriere Option on me basically gives the Quarterback 3 options as to how he wants to attack the defense in the running game based on how the defense lines up. His 3 options are The inside Veer, Midline, or the Load. The Quarterback decision will be based on how the defense lines up. For example, if there is no invert outside the openside tackle than the inside Veer should be used. The Midline should be used against a 2 or 3 Technique when there is 2 outside inverts and a 6 man box. If they give you a 6 man box like that you should run Midline. The Load play is used towards the tight side when there is no outside invert to the TE or there are 2 outside inverts versus 7-technique or 5 & 9 alignment.
Pros: it basically gives the quarterback the chance to call the right play to beat the defense every single time if he knows how to read the defenders. The offense I run does give the quarterback some options with the play I call, but it is built into the play itself. My zone plays gives the quarterback 3 options every time. He can either give, keep, or throw the bubble on the back side. I can also make it a little fancier by allowing the playside WR to run a slant as an RPO.
Cons: Personally, I do not like giving that much freedom to a quarterback to choose the play. My experience so far is that my quarterbacks do not understand how to read the defense as well as I do. It also begs the question as to how the linemen know which one they are blocking. Obviously the Quarterback would have to call something at the line of scrimmage and I am pretty sure defenses will eventually pick that up and start messing around with the offense to throw them off.
Overall, it is something that should work for an offense, but having a tight end and a fullback and a running back together on the field at the same time does not play into my offensive scheme very well. Not that I do not have that kind of personnel package built into the offense, but I do not have the personnel to run that kind of offense from the linemen to the tight end to the backs and quarterback.
Post by Coach Campbell on Sept 25, 2019 18:45:00 GMT
Austin Pink
I am a big fan of reading defenses and putting defenders in conflict. The "Option of Me" strategy provides the Quarterback with three options. He could choose the Inside Veer away from the TE side, the Midline Option to the TE side, or the Load option to or outside of the TE. This type of offensive strategy is the new age triple option in my opinion. The pros to this would be being able to have a correct option to choose on each and every play. If you have a QB you can trust it could be very dynamic for your offense. The cons would be that it may take quite awhile for your QB to feel comfortable making these quick decisions. Making sure you rep it out in practice is very important. I too like the Zone Read game, where our QB reads the backside DE, and if he crashes the QB will pull and get his eyes on the 2nd level defender, reading him will determine if the QB keeps and runs, or throws it out to a receiver on a quick bubble or flat route.
Post by Coach Campbell on Sept 25, 2019 18:46:56 GMT
Anthony Welch
I will start with the saying that your quarterback must be either a smart, quick reader or a super athlete that can make the wrong read and have a successful play. Whether it is an inside veer, mid line or loaded option I like to create mis matches on the offensive line scrimmage. I will take my chances with the inside veer or midline, or to the inverted side and put a hat on the 5 tech, not read him, double out the A gap or 1 tech DT player and take my chance with my FB vs. the WLB or my athletic QB getting to the edge with the pitch, forcing the CB to defeat the X stalk or the Rover.
Yes you can run the inside veer to the TE side and read the 5 tech or run mid line to the TE side and read the 2 or 3 tech and loaded option and read outside Rover or SS. The pros and cons on option on me is that you have options, but like the play, sometimes you will make a good read because they are staying in base; however, there are times that they will stunt and blitz, and that makes the option really difficult it they guess right on the defensive side of the ball. I was always taught to turn an option into a sweep; therefore, it is assignment football. Options often work because the defense does not often do their assignment every time and sooner or later, they will try and do someone else's job and the option breaks for a big gain, either the qb, rb, when that 5 tech wants to stick his nose inside and tackle the FB.
I run a triple i wide loaded options. My X's are split out to the numbers,taken the CB out of the play, whether they are in cover 3, 2, 4 or 0. The Triple i option can be ran as mid line, loaded or inside veer option because my FB actually reads the DT and he makes the call whether it will be inside -hip of play G-A gap or inside hip of play T-B-gap, it really does not matter what front they are in. It is more difficult in a 5 front, but we have been successful running it with a 5 front. We see a lot of 3 and 4 man fronts. We load block the 5 tech or Dog if they are in the 3-5-3 with our lead back. We want to get the QB and TB out in space on the S or outside guy. It really does not matter if we run option to the left or right side because there defense is going to line up based on our formation and not what we are going to run. We also shuffle our lead back away from the option to side to see if the defense will adjust with the backers or the DL. This triple i option formation has been very successful for me. We zone block backside and man block play side.
Post by Coach Campbell on Sept 25, 2019 18:48:58 GMT
The Quarterback has three options according to the Option on Me principle. He can call the inside veer and read 5 tech to the open end side, he can run midline to the TE side and read a 2 or 3 tech, or call Load option and read outside towards TE side. This is all determined by reading the inverts and how many guys are in the box. By reading the inverts, he will know which side to go to. For example, if he has two inverts outside the tackle box, he will want to run to the tight end side. His options are midline or load option. If there is not an invert to the open end side, then he would want to call inside veer to that side. By reading the inverts on option on me, you will always have the best play called at the line of scrimmage.
Post by Coach Campbell on Jun 28, 2020 21:22:29 GMT
Reggie Option football is awesome! A perfectly executed triple option play is one, if not the prettiest plays in football. It can put a lot of stress on the Defense by taking what they give them and potentially leaving 2 players completely unblocked, allowing them to make a decision that can always be wrong. One of the best ways to stay ahead of a defense is by putting the play calling duties on the QB. The coach can call plays, but they are calling plays on the previous information that they were given, such as the previous play. By putting play calling duties on the QB, it allows the offense to stay ahead of the defense by always being in the correct play call and not wasting a play by running a play to an incorrect look. This takes a lot of film study and a very smart/confident QB to do, but it can be done and it is extremely successful. In fact, my senior year of high school when we were fortunate enough to win a state title, our QB called 90% of our plays at the line of scrimmage. Our coach really only ever called the pass plays for when we wanted to take a shot down field.
The "Option on Me' slide talks about the 2 backs, 2 WRs, and a TE to be the best way to run option by providing an unbalanced formation. While I think that can effective, I prefer a flexbone look with 2 halfbacks, 1 fullback, and either 2 TEs or 2 WRs. When we want to go unbalanced, we keep the backfield set the same and move one of the WRs to the other side as in ineligible TE which gets our numbers to 6 and a half to 4 and a half. Unbalanced is a great way to attack 8 man fronts as the defense is forced to break their defensive stacks to get their numbers correct. When playing a 7 man front, I prefer the balanced formation as I think it is easier for the QB to read and assignments stay almost the same for the offensive lineman.
In our option on me package, the QB will have 3 plays that they can call into any look. Sometimes we give the choice of just 2. The plays we can run out of 2 tight are midline, triple option, and toss.
We want to run midline to a 2 or 3 technique (preferably 3 tech). Running it to a 3 technique will allow our guard to inside release to the second level while providing some space for the QB to make a read.
We want to run triple option to a 2I technique. This will allow a good angle for the C and G to double team the 2i and work up to the next level while we read the next player outside the guard.
Toss is a play for us to get the ball outside at any time in to virtually any look. We like running toss with a WR so we can crack the first linebacker and flare the corner with the lead halfback.
Post by Coach Campbell on Jun 28, 2020 21:25:48 GMT
Thomas
I'm a spread guy but I love option football. I ran the Wing-T in high school and I remember hearing defensive guys talk about how difficult it was to defend. I've been coaching at the high school level for 10 years and we have played a couple wing-t and triple option teams. There are not too many 6A high school programs that run these offenses, so it changes practice up for the whole week. Defensive players have to be really assignment sound. I always make the suggestion of practicing without a ball (some people hate this) because it gets the kids to make the tackle on the body they are responsible for and minimizes making mistakes on game night. Also, an offense cant just pick up and run the Triple or the wing-t without practice so it minimizes error or making taking a coach away to follow out QB scout card. I'm an offensive coach and a JV coach is playing QB and explaining everything that week. I love allowing the QB the opportunity to make plays. We had a special QB for 3 years. He was a student of the game and watched film more than some of the coaches on staff. He was allowed to check plays at the line. I like the option on me system as it's very rule based and seems easy enough to pick up. You have 3 option based on what you see and I feel like most people can pick that up.
The biggest pro I see is its fast, allows for easy reading and allows the QB to take ownership. The biggest con I see is that the kid is still in charge of the play calling. I have seen many kids mess up very easy reads across all levels. When dealing with this issue I put "check with me" in place. Kids will run what we call a "peep" tempo and we will call the play for the sideline or the box once we see the alignment. Honestly, I prefer this to allowing most kids the ability to call the play at the line of scrimmage.
Post by Coach Campbell on Jun 28, 2020 21:39:04 GMT
Robert
"Option on Me" empowers the QB by giving him the freedom to call one of three plays at the line of scrimmage based on the look the defense is showing. This ensures that the offense is running a given play at the desired defensive look. "Option on Me" will result in the QB checking to one of three plays: Inside Veer, Midline, or Load Option.
I love Option Football, and from 2016-2018 we had a very athletic QB in the Wing-T and we incorporated both Midline and Dive Option into our offense. I think both plays blend well with the Wing-T, but especially Midline. Trap is one of our core plays offensively, and often times that 3 Tech we are trying to trap will wrong arm the trapping guard and just completely collapse the hole, causing the RB to bounce outside where there is an unblocked DE and LB being kept honest only by a sweep fake to the perimeter. We like to run Midline at that same 3 Tech to ensure rule integrity for the OL. It's also good timing and spacing for the read of the QB. When we run Midline, the playside guard will fire step up the pipe, and to the 3 Tech it looks exactly like Trap. He squeezes with that playside guard which makes it a clear, definitive keep for the QB and he is now pulling the ball and getting downhill into that now vacated B-Gap.
I'm a big believer in giving the QB the freedom to check plays at the LOS. Sure there are going to be times when they make a mistake, but in my experience most of the time they are right, and more importantly giving the QB this type of freedom instills confidence in the the leader of the offense and that rubs off on everyone else.