Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I was wondering if anyone could explain ILB reads in the split 4-4 where they are A gap responsable. Any info would be appreciated through replys or email jhproffi@yahoo.com
Jason, we have run the 44 for 15 years. We adapt it to many looks and blitz into various fronts. One of the keys to our success was our inside lb reads. We read through the guards and practice it daily. Even on offensive days I have the scout defensive coach make the ILB read the guards and make the appropriate steps. They are responsible for the uncovered gap according to the front called. Versus wing t teams, we sometime slide them a half-man for protectin or cetain schemes, however the reads stay the same. At times we have had our LB's at 4 1/2 to 5 yards deep, but last year, due to inexperience, we moved them up to toes at 3 1/2 yards and had a great year. One thing we do is video the steps in the off-season. We have a center, 2 guards, FB and TB. I play rt ILB with a camera and then repeat it from the left. The offense runs Toss, power, trap, sweep, iso, g-to the te, and boot. I film everything so they see the correct steps to take, and give it to our lb's in the off-season to study. Come summer, they see in their minds what to do. It has been invaluable to us. Good luck.
Post by Jackets Coach on Feb 21, 2005 17:24:35 GMT
Coach Nick What if the guards dont pull do they read straight thru to the fullback. Also the outside linebackers to they read emol through to the near back or is this a bad way to do this I have heard different opions. And when a gurad pulls away do you have M and/or W follow and have the OSL crash the backside to avoid the cut back. I'm just curious my team pulls we are the only team in the leauge that does we see alot of doulde tights and wishbone very little wing t or much of anything else. We ran a 6-2 last year and did good but I think the 4-4 split is going to be beter for us I'm trying to get all the reads down now we coach 9 10's thanks for any advice from all
We always read through the guards. If drilled correctly, it cuts down practice time during the season when many offensive coaches get innovative. Our base for our olb's is 3x5 from the te as a starting point (though it varies with our coverages). They do read the emlos but I know this is tough as the game goes on. It has worked very well for us, however some coaches in our league are successful while reading the backfield. It's whatever you believe in that works. A game week decision for inside lb's may be for the backside ilb to stunt through the cutback lane versus some spread/zone teams. We did this the last 2 years against a team with an awesome back and held him to 116 yard and 2 tds. Since they couldn't pass, we put up 4 and took the W. I would not use this against wing t, for example because the teams we play usually do not cut back. So we watch the cutback as we scrape. I am not doing justice to my coaches in explaining this, but if you want to talk, leave your email and I would be glad to help out. I ran wishbone for a long time. When people go double tight, one of our adjustments was to jump to a 53 look. We have a 0 tech, 2-3 techs, 2-7 techs (although we go head-up and stunt a bit inside and out). We constantly slant the TNT's from head up and 3 techs and zone blitz from the hash. One thing I learned was never to give the OC's the same look. When I finally understood this years ago, make the same thing look different to 15-17 y/o kids, we became sucessful on O and D. Hope this gives you some ideas. I work very hard with our youth organization. It has been invaluable. Good luck.
Post by Jackets Coach on Feb 23, 2005 14:45:59 GMT
Coach Nick I would like to see the D you run against the wishbone we face this O about 4 or 5 games a year. I appreciate such a detailed response. We have also relized the importace of showing different looks on D at our level it destroys the offensive line blocking schemes, and allows our backs to flow to the ball easier. I'm sure you already know we see alot of sweeps this is the biggest reason for going to the 4-4 split we only have two line stunts and a few linebacker blitzes its alot for them to remember. Depending on what and how many kids you get some of the kids have to play both side so we keep it as simple as possible but effective. We spend alot of time studying football so we go to win.My email address is jacketsftb@wmconnect.com Also have you ever ran an inverted wishbone we call it a Diamond back when you have a wide out its an offset I King or Queen its deffenitlly smash mouth but I love it where working on trying to spread the defense out now any suggestions on formations is appreciated we run most of the time this year we are going to dedicate much more time to passing in practice hopfully this will keep the linebackers at bay a little longer. Thanks again
Post by OutlawJoseyWales on Feb 28, 2005 21:21:13 GMT
I have a question? Did you ask about the Split-4 or the 4-4. They are two different animals. I really like the ideas on this particular post, especially the video part, I WILL be using that this year. If you can clear this up I would appreciate it. Thanks OJW
Post by OutlawJoseyWales on Mar 1, 2005 9:26:02 GMT
Coach, I guess it's all in semantics. That looks like the old split-60. I never ran that one though.
The split-4 I've always been around has two 3's, two ends one at 5 and one at 9, two inside backers at 10's, a rover on the weakside in an 90, and a Sam on the tightend in a stand-up 6 or 7.
The 4-4 I've been around has a weak 5 end, weak 1 or 2i tackle, a strong 3 tackle, a 7 end with inside backers stacked on top of the two tackles in 10 and 30's, Will and Sam in 90's.
Both of these defenses would be cover-3 of course.
So whatever they really are supposed to be called I don't know. That's just how I learned them here in Florida. Thanks it's been fun.
We used to run the 4-4. I have tons of 4-4 material if anyone is interested in trading. By the way, in our version of the 4-4, when the ball moved left or right down the LOS the playside inside LB was to scrape to the ball (B, C, or D gap) and the backside inside LB had playside A-gap. The backside outside LB was to look for any cutbacks on the weakside A, B, C, or D gaps). Of course if the play went straight ahead the LBs have the gap they're lined up in.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
Originally, this was our Base call vs. a Pro formation. From weak to strong: 4 tech (DE), 3 tech (DT), 3 tech (DT), and 6 tech (DE). To us, "6" meant head up on the TE. The outside LBs were in a 3 X 3 outside the DEs, and both middle backers were lined up in the A gaps. I was an assistant coach (LBs and RBs) when we ran the 4-4 this way. Once I became a head coach, we ran what I called a Split 4 (for four more years), which was a little different.
First, my DC talked me out of double 3s, so we slid our weakside DT to a 2 tech. We also moved our playside OLB up to the LOS in a 9 tech on the TE side. So what we ended up with looked an awful lot like a 5-2. From weak to strong we had a 4 tech (DE), 2 tech (DT), 3 tech (DT), 6 tech (DE-we sometimes slid him into a 7), and 9 tech (Outside LB). The weakside middle LB was now slightly outside the 2 tech, and the playside LB was in the strong side A gap. The weakside outside LB was still in his 3 x 3 from the DE on his side.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."