Post by lochness on Mar 9, 2005 9:28:14 GMT
Right now, we are talking seriously about installing and using IZ and OZ as part of our base rushing attack next season. My question is primarily on the Outside Zone play.
I have seen some teams run the OZ with a wide handoff to the RB, and I have seen others run it as a toss to the RB. Both seem to be equally effective. My question is this: do you run both or do you choose a way that works best AND is there a difference in the execution of the OZ technique. I've heard many say that there are really only two Zone schemes: Inside and Outside. But, when looking at it closer, you have IZ, then you have OZ which I have seen blocked two different ways. One way is to run it like IZ but to simply push playside more and not take it on the "vertical push" like IZ. Then, I have seen it run as a completely different system, with covered linemen scooping and working up to the second level while uncovered linemen "pull and overtake" the nearest playside down defender.
I have often thought this:
1. INSIDE ZONE- Vertical push combos from 1st level to 2nd level defenders, never chasing the LB's. The RB pushes the playside OG's butt. QB delivers the ball straight back.
2. STRETCH ZONE- 6 inch horizontal steps by all OL toward playside, combo from 1st level defenders to 2nd level defenders, tracking flow to playside. RB tracks to the butt of the TE and the QB delivers the ball on a wide handoff.
3. OUTSIDE ZONE or TOSS- Covered lineman rip-scoops his man to playside and fights to work up to the second level. Uncovered lineman "pull and overtake" the next playside 1st level defender.
This is really 3 different zone schemes, not two, it would seem. There are distinct OL techniques and distinct RB steps for each play. But really all you ever hear about is Inside and Outside Zone. Is it simply a matter of terminology, or am I missing an important piece of the puzzle?
I have seen some teams run the OZ with a wide handoff to the RB, and I have seen others run it as a toss to the RB. Both seem to be equally effective. My question is this: do you run both or do you choose a way that works best AND is there a difference in the execution of the OZ technique. I've heard many say that there are really only two Zone schemes: Inside and Outside. But, when looking at it closer, you have IZ, then you have OZ which I have seen blocked two different ways. One way is to run it like IZ but to simply push playside more and not take it on the "vertical push" like IZ. Then, I have seen it run as a completely different system, with covered linemen scooping and working up to the second level while uncovered linemen "pull and overtake" the nearest playside down defender.
I have often thought this:
1. INSIDE ZONE- Vertical push combos from 1st level to 2nd level defenders, never chasing the LB's. The RB pushes the playside OG's butt. QB delivers the ball straight back.
2. STRETCH ZONE- 6 inch horizontal steps by all OL toward playside, combo from 1st level defenders to 2nd level defenders, tracking flow to playside. RB tracks to the butt of the TE and the QB delivers the ball on a wide handoff.
3. OUTSIDE ZONE or TOSS- Covered lineman rip-scoops his man to playside and fights to work up to the second level. Uncovered lineman "pull and overtake" the next playside 1st level defender.
This is really 3 different zone schemes, not two, it would seem. There are distinct OL techniques and distinct RB steps for each play. But really all you ever hear about is Inside and Outside Zone. Is it simply a matter of terminology, or am I missing an important piece of the puzzle?