Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Unless through scouting, film, etc. I have noted an opponent's tendency that would indicate this would be a smart move, I never do it. If there strength is into the boundary, so is mine.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Many teams do this as we face a few 5-2 monster teams. They put that monster in the field 99% of the time. We are in double slot and just run the other way. In our scheme, our boundary plays are very effective. That is why i liked to be balanced, we can outnumber people.
the reason that i ask, is that we have three really good players on defense: a safety, LB, and DE. most big plays are to the wide side and most teams that we play will be wide side oriented. i want to put my best players based on scouting, where the tendency shows. also, may only have one good corner, so i am thinking about using him like this also. what do offenses try to do if you see a defense call the strength to the wide side?
Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my GUNS!!!
Doesn't really make sense to me. You say you see it a lot, where do you coach? Why would a DC put his strength to the field side, OTHER THAN TO FORCE YOU TO RUN INTO THE BOUNDARY? Your team, for example, who has a proven record of success (our plays are very effective into the boundary) are just waiting for them to pull that number, correct? When you keep being effective, do they switch back and put their strength into the boundary? It would only make sense they do, IMO. If they don't, in my mind they are making a very critical tactical error, so why do it in the first place? If you are looking at a monster stopping you to go field side, without any other factors involved, that is simply rectified by putting your inside receiver in motion across the formation and stalking him. If you want to throw it, just have the receiver run a route that will influence the monster and you still have 2 receivers to work with on the motioned to side. Even your own explanation in above post echos the same sentiment, why do you think they would continue to do it? What am I missing here?
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Coach we run a field defense as our base because our players are lined up before the offense breaks the huddle and we are a balanced defense. There is a benefit to not having to move around after the offense comes to the LOS, especially for younger kids. It allows them to be more aggressive.
The reason we want a field call is to put the best athletes to the field. Whether it be a DE who is more athletic to contain, a more athletic SS to the Field to play in space/or man, a better runner at MLB. We basically try to put our better athletes to the field in certain situations/tendencies.....jet sweep/roll out pass/rocket sweep/qb boot to the field. In doing this we are by no means weakening our defense. The people into the boundary are physical player who have smaller area in which to make plays.
I run a Dallas 42 base (4-2-5) and you can't get anymore balanced than that, coach, as you have 5 to the rip side, 5 to the liz side and the FS keeps it all balanced by being in the COF. Unless you are coaching youth level, I can't see any benefit of having your team aligned prior to the offense breaking the huddle and making the PSL a snap for their QB, other than you do a lot of stemming. Most well coached teams, when I coached HS ball, were doing their best to give the opposing QB a fuzzy read by moving around and not showing their real intent. We defeated that technique by going on a quick count or using motion to get the defense to tip their hand, just as we do today. Could you please explain your theory that being in a preset defense allows for more aggressiveness? To me that could only mean employing an anticipation verses a reading philosophy that would allow them to fly to a spot rather than the ball, and that is just not sound, imo. What level do you coach? The only reason I ask that, is because the things that you do on the youth level are limited because the little guys are just getting started and I have always offered the advice of teaching them HOW AND WHERE TO ALIGN AND WHO TO BLOCK BEFORE TEACHING THEM HOW TO BLOCK, FOR EXAMPLE. PLEASE DO NOT THINK FOR ONE MOMENT THAT I AM "TALKING DOWN" TO YOU OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE, AS I CERTAINLY AM NOT, COACH. Just trying to understand y'alls perspective on this topic. Looking forward to your reply and thanking you in advance for it.
Coach Easton allows them to be more agressive
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Appreciate your philosophy and explanation, even though I can't agree with it in it's entirety. You say you are not weakening your D to the boundary side, but (just my opinion now, not trying to be argumenative) you really are when you put your BEST athletes to the field side. You compensate, you say, by having physical players to he boundary side in which the compacted defense on that side has a smaller area of responsibility, which is true, of course. HOWEVER, you have to remember also, coach, that the offense's BEST PLAYERS are going to be to that side and just being physical most of the time doesn't offset that "athleticism" that a team's BEST PLAYERS usually possess. Just food for thought and my opinion, as always.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Thanks for the reply. I must start off by saying that we package our sides, as do a lot of people. One of my (SS) is a little different that the other. I have on SS that is more similar to a OLB and one SS that has more of a secondary build. I have one MLB that is more of a ISO filler and one that is more of a runner. I package them and they typically see the same type of blocking schemes and plays run at them. We do not have the luxury of having great athletes but we do have a good system in making them fullfill their potential.
I GUESS THIS IS THE REAL POINT..... With that all aside. We are just playing a game with tendencies and so forth by making a field call. We might only run our call 5-6 times a game, but it fits the tendency, and that is the most important thing.
Thanks for the reply. I must start off by saying that we package our sides, as do a lot of people. One of my (SS) is a little different that the other. I have on SS that is more similar to a OLB and one SS that has more of a secondary build. I have one MLB that is more of a ISO filler and one that is more of a runner. I package them and they typically see the same type of blocking schemes and plays run at them. We do not have the luxury of having great athletes but we do have a good system in making them fullfill their potential.
I GUESS THIS IS THE REAL POINT..... With that all aside. We are just playing a game with tendencies and so forth by making a field call. We might only run our call 5-6 times a game, but it fits the tendency, and that is the most important thing.
Totally agree with 100% of your last post. It all boils down to a personnel thing, be it you package it as you describe above(which IMO, is very good) or you are reading tendencies. We are both saying, essentially, the same thing. You have guys on both side who are accustomed to seeing what they will see most often and that will enable them to be better defenders of those types of plays. When you are attacking tendencies, you handle it the same way. I'm with that school of thought fully! Best of luck as we get ready for a brand new season ( my 41st ) with my first preseason game only 19 days away!
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Tiger, glad we agree. You are starting your 41st and this is my 10th, glad I got a few things right. Good luck this season. We started our spring practice yesterday. My blood is pumping.
Winng the lottery wouldn't make me a bit happier than I am right now, it is the greatest feeling in the world to me, to be working full time in football at my age! (be 64 in 21 days, just lost my twin brother on March 28th). Best of luck with the Spring! Where are you located?
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Beautiful state! Played a team from Knoxville in our playoffs in 2002 and they were tough! They led at the half and came right out and scored early in the 3rd quarter. I finally found the chink in the armour I was looking for in their defense and my 5 wide empty gun started to roll offensively. Got the D right finally and we caught them on the score board half way through the 4th. Scored with about 6 minutes to go in the game to win. It was a great football game, well played and played hard by both teams. They earned my respect for sure.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
I think that you read a lot more into my post than there was. We align to the field so that the kids don't have to flip sides once the offense lines up and TE trades and motions do not affect the defense. This is the way that I learned it. You have got a lot more coaching experience than I do. I learned as a player at Augustana (IL) College in the late 1980's when they won 4 Division 3 National titles. I am a high school coach now. We have progressed as far as the state finals with the defense. I feel that when our kids know where they will be lining up it removes a little element of doubt that we used to have when we played strong and weak sides and had to wait for the offense to declare a strength. Also team were beginning to trade strengths and motion a lot more since we flipped. We have great defensive teams around here that play right and left with no strength. I completely understand why people align to strenghts and in certain coaching situations would do it. No offense taken here.
I am in Cincinnati. We are a smaller school in comparison to the Elders, St. Xaviers, Colerains, etc. who are in the USA today every week in the top 25. To answer your question, I dont know why they sit in that look. Our hitches, screens, belly, & midline has been quite successful away from their strength. Some teams have often went to a 2-deep look and rolled the guys up for force. But I agree with your thinking here. It is an error to favor the field when the offense prefers the boundary. In addition, we also had a stud WR and teams would put that SS to his side as well trying to take away the short stuff. Our philosophy is pretty simple. We are usually balanced and just try to play a numbers game.
Coach Easton, My heartfelt condolences on the passing of your brother. I haven't been on this board too long, but I quickly learned to always read what you have to say. I respect your opinions and have learned from you. My deepest sympathy, Coach Heckman