Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by Coach Nicholson on May 11, 2005 6:51:10 GMT
Coaches,
The stance I used when I played and I teach now is not exactly your prototypical stance. Most people seem to teach the 3 point stance where 1 foot is slightly staggered back behind the other. The stance I like to have my DT's and NG's in is a 4 point sprinters type stance with 1 leg positioned up much further than the other. I have found that this stance allows my guys to start in a much lower base thus allowing them to fire out much lower. By starting in this sprinters stance my guys can really EXPLODE out of their stance.
Do any of you other coaches use a somewhat unconventional stance for your DL? What do you think of the stance I teach?? What are the advantages of the more typical 3 point stance?
I don't see anything 'wrong' with your stance - it is all based on the purpose of that player. I used to be a NT in college in a 3-4. We predicated our first step off a read as we were responsible for 2 gaps (T-N-T). This being the case, I couldn't favor one side or the other, so I adopted a stance that was darn near parallel in the foot stance....it was REALLY squatty, so at the first step I posted the center and the next step was countering his reach. I later moved on to play in a 42 Nickel defense and later some AF2 ball as a DE and the stance was dramatically different, because it was all about PENETRATION, so the near foot UP to gap with opposite hand down was the way we had to play it ---being there was no reason to 'post' a blocker / control a gap.
I teach our NT / DT that their stance should be much more compact (less stagger) because we want them coiled as much as possible. The 4 point base is a good place to start, to teach them that on that first step they'd better be getting a up-through explosion on the bag / blocker.
Brophy- I know you are in Davenport, and you played in a 3-4 in college...was that 3-4 taught to you by Ardel Weigant in Cedar Falls @uni?? Just wondering...
I teach the 4-2 scheme like you do at central...may have to post one of my DT's head up on center to help solve problems with other DT (3 tech and 0 tech...desert swarm-like!)...any help with cues, keys, drills to help me teach head up DT?
the potential problem with that big stagger is being able to step w/ the inside foot to take away the inside release in the 4-3. which foot is up for your guys?
Have to agree with the other posters who have voiced concerns over the big sagger stance. In addition to the forseable problems listed, it would be A BALANCE issue with me and a TIMING PROBLEM GETTING THE ALL IMPORTANT SECOND STEP DOWN. hAVE YOU NOT FOUND THOSE TO BE ISSUES AS WELL?
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Post by Coach Nicholson on Jun 16, 2006 10:09:31 GMT
The stance I was speaking of when I started this topic a year ago is a stance that I would use more in a defense where my TNT's are 2 gap players. This would allow them to explode into the man that they are mirror reading and then get across his face. Now that I am coaching in a defense that is mostly gap control I will teach my kids to cut down that stagger to allow them to stay under better control.