Post by BROPHY on Aug 8, 2005 11:26:08 GMT
Gentlemen...
I'm a LB coach, but I've coached the secondary years ago. I always taught landmarks as the fundamental for footwork, but stressed route reads for the Corners.
For instance - In cover 3, I'd have CB over #1 at a depth and he would get his 3 step backpedal and keep his cushion on #1. Once #1 broked down (dropped hips) for a stalk, we'd attack his outside shoulder and work an escape. If #1 pressed vertical, we bailed to keep our cushion. If #1 broke inside, we immediately look to #2 across, gaining depth (wary of Corner route by #1)...
Well, the DB guy on our staff now, is real old school and wants our corners playing in looking at the QB and reading the QB the entire time. At the snap, he wants the CBs to back pedal while eye balling the QB. If QB shows pass, they bail and read his shoulders. They jump the anticipated area where the QB's shoulders point to.
I got into a debate with him the other day, and asked if he was going to work route recognition with his guys, because I was hoping I could get together with his group with my OLBs and work against 2-man route combo (recognition)....I questioned how efficient / successful would he be putting those CBs in a situation without recognition.
My question is, is this okay? To me, from a teaching standpoint, it's way too vague to expect a kid to 'cover an area' when there are so many variable that can happen and put him out in no-man's land. Everyone's different, I respect that, and there is no ONE WAY to coach, but just looking out for the overall success of the defense...
Any feedback is appreciated.
I'm a LB coach, but I've coached the secondary years ago. I always taught landmarks as the fundamental for footwork, but stressed route reads for the Corners.
For instance - In cover 3, I'd have CB over #1 at a depth and he would get his 3 step backpedal and keep his cushion on #1. Once #1 broked down (dropped hips) for a stalk, we'd attack his outside shoulder and work an escape. If #1 pressed vertical, we bailed to keep our cushion. If #1 broke inside, we immediately look to #2 across, gaining depth (wary of Corner route by #1)...
Well, the DB guy on our staff now, is real old school and wants our corners playing in looking at the QB and reading the QB the entire time. At the snap, he wants the CBs to back pedal while eye balling the QB. If QB shows pass, they bail and read his shoulders. They jump the anticipated area where the QB's shoulders point to.
I got into a debate with him the other day, and asked if he was going to work route recognition with his guys, because I was hoping I could get together with his group with my OLBs and work against 2-man route combo (recognition)....I questioned how efficient / successful would he be putting those CBs in a situation without recognition.
My question is, is this okay? To me, from a teaching standpoint, it's way too vague to expect a kid to 'cover an area' when there are so many variable that can happen and put him out in no-man's land. Everyone's different, I respect that, and there is no ONE WAY to coach, but just looking out for the overall success of the defense...
Any feedback is appreciated.