Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I am a defensive coordinator with a smaller sized school which is attempting to platoon this season. We area class 3-A school in Idaho and have about seventy players out for varsity and JV teams (about 30 are varsity players). Last year we finished third in the state playoffs losing to the eventual state champion after running out of gas in the second half. Last year we played about 15 kids for the majority of the game and it hurt us when it came to crunch time, so we are making the switch at trhe current time.
Here are some answers to your questions:
I believe it is good for all teams, if you have trust in your players. The more players who are contributing the better, you also should be fresher later in games by playing more players.
Our defense is replacing 9 starters and our offense the same, by platooning at this time we are decreasing the demand on players who would normally have to perform on both sides of the ball.
We are going to try to have 22 starters, but we realize that we may have some players who are just too talented to keep off of the field and that we will also come across times when we have injuries that will force players to play on both sides of the ball.
All of our players are learning one offensive position and one defensive position so I think our depth will be much greater. For instance last year we had three kids who could see action at corner and not hurt us, problem was that one of the three was a starting linebacker. This year we have four kids that are solid and could play without any hesitation, our very best corner will be a starting running back, so he will be a backup or could start if the other players are not getting the job done.
So far our practices have been more competitive. Each player practices an offensive spot and a defensive spot each night and we run team against each other. When it gets time to prepare versus a scout tem we will be practicing against a very good team rather than players who do not get to play.
Hope this helps, if have any other questions please let me know.
Post by Coach Campbell on Sept 23, 2005 8:16:52 GMT
2 platooning is good if you have the numbers and it also gives your offense and defensive players more reps and preparation time. It is my believe and I coach in a big program to keep your best players on the field. Coach CAmpbell
We are in the 4a class in Washington and We started this last season as we figured a 100 % 2nd teamer was better than the 60 % first teamer he replaced. We were a 2-8 team the year before and this past season we improved to 5-5 and narroly missed two other wins in which we came back both times in the 4th quarter. For us it has not only improved us as a program but has more kids excited and ready to contribute. What we do is look at a kid and determine is he better offensively or defensively then if he is a better offensive player we may have him split a defensive position. As an example last year we had a DE and OLB who were both defensive starters and they split the TE position for us on offense. All of our kids have a position on both defense and offense and they all have individual time on both sides of the ball.
Build the DEFENSE FIRST by putting the VERY BEST YOU HAVE ON THAT SIDE OF THE BALL, PERIOD.(THIS FROM A COACH WHO HAS ALWAYS RAN THE OFFENSE!)
IF YOU HAVE THE NUMBERS, TWO PLATOONING IS DEFINITELY THE WAY TO GO, PROVIDED YOU HAVE STARTERS AND BACKUPS OF EQUAL, OR ALMOST EQUAL TALENT LEVELS.
IF YOU DON'T, FACE THE FACT THAT KEEPING THE BEST PLAYERS ON THE FIELD IS ALWAYS RIGHT IN MY BOOK! TWO PLATOONING TO ME DOES NOT MEAN HAVING A COMPLETE SET OF 1'S AND 2'S AT EACH POSITION THAT ARE GOING TO CHANGE OUT EACH SERIES, ETC. IT MEANS TO ME THAT IN ORDER TO KEEP THE BEST PLAYERS IN THE GAME AT ALL TIMES, SOME ARE GOING TO HAVE TO PLAY BOTH WAYS.
I WANT THE GUYS WHO DO NOT PLAY BOTH WAYS TO BE READY TO GIVE THOSE PLAYERS WHO DO, A BLOW, NO MATTER WHAT SIDE OF THE BALL HE IS ON. MY SON, WAS A QB WHO MADE ALL STATE AT THAT POSITION AND ALSO MADE ALL STATE AS A FREE SAFETY ON THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL. I NEVER HESITATED TO PUT HIM ON DEFENSE WHEN THE SITUATION CALLED FOR IT. Just my way as always.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
It probably would do that for your program. However, a word of caution here; as you say all kids want to play after putting in a good weeks work on the practice field, it is only natural. But, do not oversell the idea of guaranteeing them playing time just because you decide to go to a two platoon system, as if you want to win you will not always be able to do that. Two platooning has always meant to me it is an excellent opportunity for a #2 player to really polish his skills in practice by getting more reps! When your # 2 guys have reached equanimity with your #1's, then you have a football team. Having spent a lot of time around the Florida State team when I was coaching high school level football, I was always so impressed with the fact that there was almost an imperceptable drop off factor regarding talent levels from the #1 through the # 3 guys really!!! The #4's could have been #2's for most Div. 1-A programs, honestly!
It is an excellent chance to really improve your non-starters.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
I wouldn't be purely 2 platooning - there would likely be 2-3 guys going on both O and D and of course you always find some people can't play at a position. But we'd also be fresher... similar reasons behind running the 34 this year on D - we're a little short on decent lineman and rotating in 6 guys for 3 sports is better than 4.
As the playoffs rolled around it would change - the best players for those spots playing.
My rationale is that we have some STELLAR athletes in our school but they aren't coming out for football. If I can change that... it could really inject some serious athletes into the program. The other sports' coaches are supportive of my program too.
For example we have somes kid who are AMAZING track athletes -> scholarships to GOOD track programs and times/distances that compete with ANYONE in their age group in the world. They don't play football or are reluctant to... yet played football prior to HS.
The previous coach really only played about 14 players - and that is PART of the reason for our poor season last year - we had 10 returners but only about 2 of them saw any playting time.
For example.... we have a freshman who is out throwing people in discus, shot and javelin by 5-6 meters in all the meets so far and has hands the size of watermelons! He'd be placing about 5th in our area as a SENIOR - and he has NO technique.