Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
After watching several playoff games this year I was wondering if there is a difference in coaching the OL in these systems. I saw many innovative ideas and am curious about why different teams used such a wide variety of stances. Some teams only used a 2 point stance, others had the tackles in a 2 point, and I also saw some with the linemen down on one side and in a 2 point on the other. What would be the advantage or purpose?
Post by Coach Campbell on Jan 14, 2003 4:46:22 GMT
Coach the stance is just ones liking. No matter the stance you can still use the same techniques for you o-line from under center as you would if he was in shotgun. Coach CAmpbell
As one who runs the shotgun a lot, I like the two point stance for two reasons: 1- being in an up position, your linemen can see and recognize stunts and blitzes. 2-You are not fooling anybody about what you intend to do. There are good teams who do run the ball out of the shotgun, but it is still the pass threat is the reason you run the shotgun and even most of your run plays come off a draw action.
Coach C is absolutely right, though, the technique is much the same whether down or up, it is more just a matter of preference. But, for me, the vision thing noted above was the main reason I like it.
I have worked in a system where we used a 2 point stance; and at the current system I am at we use the 3 point stance. I personaly like the 2 point better but under this current system we did very little 3 or 5 step drops. We were mostly sprint out, so we do alot of hinge blocking. I have also found that if you pay alot of attention to stance. Then your linemen start to lean we you get ready to run the counter trey.