Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by Coach Nicholson on Nov 1, 2005 19:16:12 GMT
Im sitting here watching Memphis play and I cant help but wonder why they continue to sit in this 2-4-5 look. UAB is basically running at will on them but they seem content to stay in this defense. Im sure the Memphis coaches know far more than I do but why continue to sit in a defense with only 2 defenseive linemen on the field when your opponent is running right over top of you? Memphis is walking LB's up to the LOS but they are just getting shoved backwards! Maybe some of you coaches on here can explain their defensive strategy to me. I can definetly say im not familar with the 2-4-5 defense at all.
Patriots did something SIMILAR vs Colts in playoffs last season, to get more coverage on Colts receivers since they weren't worried about Manning scrambling.
Years ago Houston played a 2-6-2 vs Homer Rice's prolific pass offense at Rice University with Tommy Kramer at QB.
The Don Shula Miami Dolphins (in their perfect 17-0 season of 1972) play a 3-5-3 coverage scheme out of a "34" look.
In ALL these - some of the underneath coverage people have runs reads (for example the OLB in a 9 tech in Shula's 3-5-3 read run if TE blocked & pass if TE released. That way he could be a factor in the pass defense & vs. running game. That is the way these type of defenses are PLANNED! Sometimes they don't get executed (vs run) as planned!
All of these are just ways teams try to confuse somebody's pass offense.
Post by Coach Nicholson on Nov 2, 2005 9:01:08 GMT
I have seen 2 man fronts used for various reasons but I just cant imagine running it as your base look against a team that has the ability to run the ball on you. I completely understand the idea of walking up Lb's and giving them run reads but IMO its just not as effective as having actual defensive linemen on the field. I know this same type of strategy is used in many defenses such as the 33 stack and that is fine when it is working...but when your LB's are simply being out maned by the opposing O-line I think it would be wise to send in a different personel package.
If your DE's are strong in a 2-6-5 look you could hold up the tackles and create good movement to the ball. I have seen a junior high team do something similar 2 this.
Why not ?
I'm thinking about a NO MAN FRONT on the last play of a game/half when the other team is no closer than our @ 30 yard line. What options does that QB have at that point? If he throws there is 11 defenders "deep", and if he runs he's in unfamiliar territory with 11 coming up to stop it once he crosses the LOS.
ANY THOUGHT ON THIS?
Coach nicholson, I wasn't trying to be argumentative. I AGREE with your thought that staying in in might not have been the best thing! However, we rushed 3 against a team and they moved the ball as well, but they didn't get into the end zone. We knew they were a team that threw lot of picks and we waited for them to self destruct. We also had bone crushing hits on their receivers all day long which won the Psy-Ops battle.
Coach,
It was more that THEY DIDN'T have a sound one!
They were 1 dimensional, and I didn't want to put my team in a position where IF the QB got the ball off before the pressure and one of my guys fell down in the secondary they scored. I'm sure there were many armchair QB's in the stands saying "they are driving the ball right down the field", and a play later they were cheering the crunch or the pick.
I personnally would like to bring heat but our line wasn't that good at pass rush, and our LBs need work on their blitzing but they like to sit in their zone and wreck people. 2 areas defensively I targeted for next year!!