Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by optionfootball on Nov 28, 2005 11:12:17 GMT
is it more effective to run alot of formations and a few plays or alot of plays out of just a few formations? We are a flexbone team and we get caught up in this every year...we seem to get in a rut of running out of our base set (double slot) most of the time...I personally like it, but other coaches on staff seem to think we need to change formations each play to keep the defense off balance...I like it because you almost always know what you are going to get defensively...I watch Ga. Southern, Navy, and Air Force play and they don't seem to change very often (GSU and navy hardly ever change)...how important is it?
"It's like novocain. Just give it time, it always works!"
That's a good question. It seems like a lot of people are running a variety of formations around here. I think it is nice to have different formations if it gives you an advantage. Like you said, if you stay the same, you know what you are going to see. If you like what you see, that is fine.
We like to run our running plays out of a 2 back set, ant then out of a 1 back set. To me as a D-coordinator, this is a lot different and puts a lot of pressure on us if we have to respect the pass and run from the QB.
If a different formation can change the defense's normal alignments and / or techniques, it can be a major advantage for the offense. If not, it can still put the defense under pressure or give you an advantage.
When we're defending the option, we have to be very aware of the formation we are facing as it can mess up our responsibiliites.
I guess what I'm saying is that if you know how to control your opponent with formation, it is good to change. Otherwise it's a waste of time.
I'm at school and have to go. Sorry if this doesn't make any sense. Interesting topic.
Coming from a defensive mindset, and sitting in with my DC and gameplanning on the weekends, if we see a team that plays a couple of formations a majority of the time, we get excited because we can spend more time on reppin and less on showing all the formations, what to be aware of, what to check and so forth. But if you got a good, solid squad, then it may be to your advantage because you as a OC can rep the hell of of your package and you got the horses to do the job. Florida State comes to mind, espeically during their dominance. They were the easiest team to prepare for in regards of knowing all the checks, the tendencies and so forth because they would run I-pro, slot, and a touch of spread (3 WR)when they needed the yards. However, play a team like Wake Forest, it was a headache because every play was a different formation with all types of motions and what not. Now FSU dominated the ACC and Wake had a hard time cracking the middle of the pack. However, I do not know how Wake would do if they ran a simple I-pro offense like FSU did. They may not have been able to do that in the ACC. All in all, IMO, you should look at your squad compared to your opponents (physically and mentally) and decide what needs to be done and if your players can handle what is going to be done. Keep up the great work!
"H.E.A.R.T.- The Blueprint for Success!"
H-onesty
E-ffort
A-ttitude
R-espect
T-rust
As a DC I hate to see teams come out in multiple formations. It takes us more time to adjust to them and at some point mistakes are made. Most teams run the shotgun option stuff now and only run 3-5 formations and that has been a dream for me. I dont' have to worry about adjustments for the most part and can work on scheme. The hardest team for us to prepare for this year ran over 35 different formations in 7 games. We can only work on about 7-8 during the week and as I thought ran about 3 new ones during the game.
Another expample is our Head Coach and OC, he was our DC for 19 years before moving to O. He runs over 60 different formations and shifts and lines up 5 yards off the ball and sprints to the line and will shift or just run the play. Most defenses can't adjust in time so they hands are tied and have to play simple straight D. We run all of our base plays our of many different looks. I am glad I dont' have to defend our team.
As for the FSU / Wake comparison. Talent allows you to be simple. If I have a ton of studs I can run a base 50 or 4-3, but since I don't I run a bunch of stems and blitz from all over the place to over come our talent base.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle
"Hard work beats talent, when talent doesn't work hard."
As a defensive coordinator, I do not like multiple formations either, but only if they don't have any real tendencies to run specific plays out of them. Usually in high school they do.
Lou Cella
Head Varsity Football Coach
Greater Nanticoke Area High School (PA)
I figured as a defensive coordinator I would chime in as well. To me, formations gives us problems. You have to show them to the kids or risk getting outflanked, etc. We would try to group the formations and give the kids basic adjustments (to trips, unbalanced, etc.). But formations used with a quick count is very effective because it gives us less time to adjust.