Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
We had trouble with a very large OT getting out of his 3 point stance last season. What are some ways and drills to teach run blocking out of a 2 point stance? Also, what are the pros and cons of it? Thanks
NOT trying to be facetious, but TRY to take as much weight off him as his family physician will allow! Remember: "HITTERS ARE KNEE BENDERS" (power producing angles come in the ankles, knees, AND hips).!!!!!!!! If he is not flexible enough to get into a good 3 point stance = I don't know how he can UNCOIL. Putting him up all the time may not be the answer!
We went from 3pt to 2pt stance midseason,,,we are a spread team with one back and shotgun set. We did not have a drop off on our run blocking effectiveness. every drill in practice began out of the 2pt stance except for centers....chute drills helped the boys keep their knees bent. Working on foot quickness is key so that the OL can put themselves in position to execute the block. 2pt stance helped the boys see what angles the defensive front was attacking from. follow all other cardinal rules for drive blocks out of the 2 pt stance.
The use of the old "Crowther" Drill. we neither use a Crowther (we use the Rogers "Mod Sled" with the big "Pro-A Pad"), nor do we shoulder block, but we can STILL use that progression to teach explosion. This is one of the OLDEST drills in football - older than I am (& I am 69 years old).
EXPOLDE out of 6 points, 4 points, 3 points, 2 points, etc. KEEP THE "POWER PRODUCING ANGLES" IN THE STANCE:
Procedure:
1. Offensive lineman aligns in front of the pad on the 2 Man sled.
2. On coach's command he will fully unload hands blow to the padded area of the sled, fully extending his hips on contact.
3. Player will align just far enough from the sled to be in a fully extended position on contact. It is okay for him to have same slight sag in his abdominal area while being fully extended on the sled.
Coaching Points:
1. Do not align player too far from the sled or player will not be able to stay in a fully extended position.
2. Deliver blow with the hands, not the shoulder - to the NUMBERS on the pad. Use a slight windup - elbows & hands in tight
3. Do NOT move the feet from their original position in the stance (in the 6 or 4 point positions).
4. Player should stay square to the sled with neck bridged back, never striking the head. Players below the professional level should always wear a helmet when doing this drill.
Players do NOT drive the sled in this drill -just work on EXPLOSION out of the Power Angles. IF from a 3 or 2 point stance - only TWO steps are permitted.
I totally agree with Bill on this one: 2 pt stance just puts the OL in to HIGH A STANCE TO NOT BECOME AN EASY TARGET FOR A GOOD SOLID, CLOSE HANDED PUNCH TECHNIQUE. THe idea is to make it more difficult for the defender to get his hands on the OL, not easier. Just my opinion as always. I, too, would like to hear from the coach as to how he maintains no drop off in blocking effectiveness using this technique of the 2 pt stance. Certainly ot seeking an argument, just a good football discussion here on the forum. I respect everyones opinion, I don't accept them all of course, but always respect another man's view point.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
coaches, We are a spread philosophy offense 4 wideouts with a single back shotgun qb. My HC and OC both wanted the OL in 2 pt stance against my advice, we started the season with our tackles in 2pt. and our guards in 3pt. by the 4th game i was forced into having the guards play out of 2pt stances also.
within the 5 yard line on goaline situation we worked out of power I, then all OL were in 3 pt stances.
we rep'd chute drills every week of the season out of 2 pt stance, if the boys didn't stay low they bang their heads on steel. I took every aspect of run blocking progression except out of a 2 pt stance (a very low and balanced stance)
we also rep'd hand placement and locking onto DL breast plate before the defender could get into our numbers.
We are not a power running team although we ran for lots of yards, our qb and rb combined for over 1500 yds on the ground in 10 games, we went from 0-10 to 4-6 this past year. We took advantage of angles and positioning ourselves well in space. The advantage of 2 pt was being able to see where the defense was coming from pre-snap.
These are some of the benefits to a 2-pt OL according to Tony Demeo's Coaching the Complete Triple Gun Offense book.
1. In a 2pt stance, the offensive line can adjust their splits after the D lines up.
2. By being in a 2pt stance, the offensive line hides the dive back, thereby making it difficult for the defense to find him.
3. The secondary - in particular the free safety- can't tell the difference between the run and the pass, because the O line is already up in the 2pt stance.
4. Because the QB is off the line of scrimmage in the gun, the Oguards cant be overpowered by the the 2techs.
I'm also considering having our Oline go 2pt this year. I would agree though that standing up to high and not getting as much drive could be a problem, although when running this gun spread stuff losing some ground on a 1v1 block isn't that important. Also most Oline blocks are 2v1 combos to the LBs so losing ground there should also not be an issue because if my 2 can't drive your 1 then they prolly wouldnt start anyway. I would love to hear from a coach that has experimented with this and hasnt liked it.
I'm also looking at a two Pt. stance, especially for all shotgun formations.
My points are:
Already in a pass blocking mode, hands are already up and ready to punch.
Most of, if not all, what we do will either be pass, draw, trap, shuffle pass, option..can all be done from the 2pt. stance.
GL-SY-3-pt. and teach drive block..only teaching one block,
QB under center......I'm researching the same premise as the shotgun....it it's pass, trap, draw, screen, shuffle then drive blocking won't be neccessary.
How do we gain toughness if we are always up. Spend time each day with on the drive block. Spend time each week going live SY and GL , best against best. Demand toughness and be physical...most will get it on the defensive side anyway by two platooning..which we have to do.
Welcome all thought.....still deciding....
Deac14
Happy are those who dreams dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true.
AGREE WITH YOUR THOUGHTS ON A 2 PT. FROM the GUN FORMATION(as in my opinion, any gun formation, especially an empty, (your selling the defense on you had better get ready for a pass) is sound. I do not agree with your thoughts on run blocking form a 2 pt. My toughts are much aligned with bills on this one. EXPLOSIVE PUNCH ATTACK BY THE OL ON A DL IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN WITH ANYWHERE NEAR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMING OUT OF A 2 RATHER THAN A 3 PT. STANCE. The tendency, here again may be just my opinion, to stand up quicker from a 2 pt than a 3 pt is always present and when run blocking that can be fatal as you well know. I am a proponent of Joe Bugels offensive blocking technique( close handed punch intended to stop the opponents heart, followed by a quick getting down of the second step to insure balance and stability in the OLM.) EXPLOSION OFF THE LOS is absolutely paramount in this technique and you simply can't get the necessary explosion from a 2 pt. Just my view as always.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
My answer is inclusive of ANY type play(running of course). Think about this aspect, which is really the basis for my reasoning: A body that is extended like an OLM's is in a two point, verses a compact, ready to explode 3 point, offers a much EASIER target for the DLM to take advantage of. WE TRAP ON THE OPPONENTS SIDE OF THE LOS, RIGHT? THAT IS THE TROUBLE WITH MOST HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL LINE COACHES, THEY TEACH THAT YOU TRAP IN OTHER FASHIONS. If you try to shoot across the LOS in a 2 pt stance to trap block, your at a disadvantage in my opinion, because you are STEPPING TO THE BLOCK AND NOT EXPLODING TO IT AS IS REQUIRED BY A 3 PT. In my opinion it is hard to go through a DLM's ear hole on a trap block when you are up high and not exploding into the block as is required by the 3 pt. Your thoughts?
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
I did not notice any drop off on our pulls at impact. I coach aiming points, locking on to the breast plate and extension....proper steps and angles also important. I was skeptical at first, then glad that we tried it
Thanks to coach Easton's tip, we will approach the pull block differently by traping on the d's side of the los.
Last season we went to a one-back spread system after 3 years of being am 85% of the time double tight wing-T team. Neadless to say the transformation was a little rough and we didn't quite "get" the offense until about half way throught the season. Despite this we, we broke or tiednearly every offensive school record we had and only won three games.
My initial thought was we were going to use a 2pt offensive line stance. No exceptions, no excuses. We were going to commit to this and stick to it. We practiced this and drilled the daylights out of it for the first week. As a coach my players know that I rely on their honesty and I will always return the gesture. My players feel free to give me their suggestions and talk to me about what the need to do to be more successful. Two of my veteran lineman came to me and said "Coach, you know how you always tell us that the low man wins in football, well I don't feel I can get low enough and don't feel confident blocking while I am in a 2-pt. stance." After discussing this with my OL coach we decided that we would go back to the 3-pt. stance.
The reason the we madethis decision was not just because two players didn't care for it thoguht it did help. Barry Switzer wrote one time that every year he timed his athletes coming out of a 2-pt stance Vs coming out of a 3-pt. stance and that ever year the times were faster out of the three. Another reason is becauase I firmly believe that sports and athletics especially with high school aged athletes is a head game. If my players believe that they can not block effectively from a 2-pt. then they won't. This does not discourage us from trying new things but if there seems to be no real advantage then we will revert back to where we feel most comfortable.
It is hard for me to argue against a 2-pt. stance when so many successful programs at all levels are using it. The 3-pt. stance seem to work better for us when running and passing. My suggestion is first, trust players, ask them where they feel most comfortable and second, teach them the 2-pt. and the 3-pt. stance early in their football career. Then they will feel comfortable with both. What works for us may not work for everyone. These are just my thoughts. Good luck to everyone.
I've been working both stances with our linemen during the summer workouts. I just want to see if the bigger and heavier players have a better chance in 2 pt. pass blocking than coming out of a 3 pt. Jury is still deliberating.
Happy are those who dreams dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true.
Good for you in trying both methods! As you well know, and we have discussed, more than one way to skin a cat! My ending comment on a topic like this has always been, go with what you know and with what you feel comfortable with as long as the kids can EXECUTE it.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE