Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Coaches,
I am a new d-coordinator. Only days old. I have had the opportunity to coorespond with coach Mountjoy. EXCELLENT information and TREMENDOUSLY helpful!!!
I am in the process of organizing what exactly I want to do. I have seen success at other schools where we have run the 52 slant/ange, and 44. I've been struggling with the 52 when it comes to the drop end, etc. and covering motions, etc. The 44 seems as if it is a simple system for both kids and coaches. However, the 50 shade intrigues me.
Here is the shade: Shade, 5, 9 to one side (9 can be in walk technique if no TE), 3 and either 5 or 8 (depends on if there is a TE)
1. Open front= very similar to an angle to the open side. Very similar to the 44
2. Tight front= very similar to the front angling to the TE side. Seems strong to the TE. More like a 50.
3. Plus front= vs 2x2 sets, check to a 43 look so LBs can react to #2s.
The nice thing about this defense is you 3 tech is always a 3 tech. etc. All positions remain the same technique because you can declare whey they set-- to the open side or the tight side.
Is this too much? It doesn't seem like it is to me, but I've never really done this before.
The 52 seems the simplest, but I can't figure out the various checks to the motions, etc.
Any advice would be great. I need to move to the next stage of planning almost immediately. It is geting late in the game.
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.
What coverages will you play?
We play a couple teams that run a shade and we base out of a 5-2.
I think the shade is a great defense. It can be a pain for man blocking teams to prep for if you can change up your tendencies to shade. We have given shade teams a fit by going to TE trips formations and running or rolling out to the TE side. We seem to attack the drop end side of the shade defense most of the time besides these types of plays, and have had a lot of success doing so, but I think this is mostly becaue teams will put their best players on the rush end side (rush end, SS, and MLB).
To me, the weakness of both defenses is expecting that drop end to play both the run and pass. That is why we have success running to the drop end side. That is also why we don't have the ends play much pass coverage in our 50. We will play as much man and / or cover 2 as we can and just let the DEs play the run. If a back releases outside of them they run with them (in theory anyway, a lot of times this doesn't get done).
I agree that it is nice to have the interior people play pretty much their same techniques every play (3 tech, 1 tech, etc), but you can really do that in any defense.
I love the 50, but that is also what I know. I love the fact that we can change alignments, but keep techniques the same. I like how the front 7 have a key right in front of them to read every play, and how our defense is always set up to contain the ball and run to it.
Do you have any more knowlede or experience running either defense? I think that should be the determining factor for you.
Good topic.
Coach,
I plan on running cover 4 and 3. When we have a wide two, we will have the option of checking to a cover two on one side of the ball or both (so long as we are in cover 4).
Also, with the shade, I will predominantly call bench defense when into the boundary setting up our 9 technique into the boundary. Normally in the middle of the field, I'll set up as an open defense. I think this will stop some problems we might have with teams attacking our 9tech with pass.
Also, if I were in the middle of the field and decided to set to the TE, I would always be in cover 4. The problem is, how do you cover a back's release if their is only a SE? Do you cloud to that side automatically?
thanks
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.
Stoptherun, decide on a base, and have tweeks that will allow you to Attack certain offenses and keep your Defensive Concepts the same....Some Coaches want to run Multiple Looks; however, their concepts are multiple which will place SHACKLES on the Players....Do what you know, and what your Jimmies and Joes allow U 2 do.........:light;
In a "5-2 COVER 3" - here are the adjustments. I got out of this defense BECAUSE if they come out & line up so that you declare strength left - then they SHIFT so the strength is now right - then they MOTION so the strength is now left again. WE do this - so do MANY teams we play! The defense looks like a "Chinese Fire Drill".
In the above scenario - You are FORCED to change the CALL 3 times (including the original call).
Lets just look at ONE change of strength, LET ALONE 2 or 3!!!
If the offense changes strength & becomes HEAVY right - here are the changes:
LE becomes a drop end rather than a contain rush end
LT becomes a contain pass rusher rather than an inside pass rusher
NOSE's pass rush lane changes from right to LEFT (in Cover 3 he must rush opposite the secondary call)
RT becomes an inside pass rusher rather than a contain pass rusher.
RE becomes a contain pass rusher rather than a drop end.
S/S must either go OVER with the change of strength, OR, replace the F/S in MOF - while F/S must invert down right. THIS PRESENTS A MAJOR PROBLEM BECAUSE IT IS TOO FAR FOR THE S/S TO RUN TO GET OVER (THEN HE MAY HAVE TO CHANGE SIDES AGAIN), AND THE F/S IF HE DOES HAVE TO INVERT DOWN IF THERE IS A WR THAT SIDE IS NOT USE TO THE POWER SWEEP RUN SUPPORT THAT THE S/S IS! IF YOU BRING THE S/S ACROSS TO ADJUST - WE WILL TRY TO RUN HIM OVER & BACK 2 or 3 TIMES! IF YOU BRING YOUR F/S DOWN - WE WANT HIM TO TAKE ON A 225 LB FB - & I DOUBT IF HE CAN DO THAT NEAR AS WELL AS THE S/S (WHO PRACTICES THAT ALL WEEK).
I am SURE others will say they have a simpler way to do it (BUT IS IT SOUND?), more power to them. Above is how ALL great "5-2" teams I ever met did it, & it is too damned much for High School. We LOVE to see 5-2 Cover 3. Any FORM of 5-2 (shade or not) is vulnerable to 2 TE's BECAUSE 7 guys have 8 gaps to defend!
Do not wish to discuss any "WHAT IF'S" except by phone. I have a "typer's cramp" in my right arm all ready!
804-740-4479 up to 10 PM/EDT
PS: A 4-3 Under-Shade gives you the SAME look as a 5-2 SHADE/EAGLE, & is much easier to play. The 4-4 gives you the SAME PASS COVERAGE (3 deep zone/4 under/4 rush) & is by FAR the easiest of ALL to play. THE PASS COVERAGES ON ALL OF THESE IS IDENTICAL IN COVER 3!
Bill - Those are some very good arguments for playing a 4-4. How would you align to a double tight, one back (ace) set with your 4-4? 1 and 5/7, 3 and 7 techniques?
The GREAT thing about the 44 (4-2-5) is that you do NOT have to make 9 million adjustments to SHIFTS/MOTIONS/MYRIAD FORMATIONS! Basically, the only thing we adjust is our "chin straps"!
44 VS 2 TIGHT ENDS: We take #'s 1 & 4 into EACH game. #'s 2 & 3 are used vs certain teams.
I. 44 OVERSHIFTED (to wide field OR strength of formation)
A) CALLSIDE OLB = REGULAR (80 Tech. 3x3)
B) CALLSIDE DE = 7
C) CALLSIDE DT = 3
D) CALLSIDE ILB = 30 Tech (Inside shoe to crotch of OG)
E) OFFSIDE DT = SHADE (IF THEY TRAP BETTER THAN ISO), OR, 1 Tech. IF THEY ISO BETTER THAN TRAP)
F) OFFSIDE ILB = 30 Tech (INSIDE SHOE TO CROTCH OF OG)
G) OFFSIDE DE = 5
H) OFFIDE OLB = 9
NOTE: This is the same as our "BASE/REGULAR" except OLB comes up & plays a 9 on the backside (rather than an 80 Tech. if there is a split end).
II. 44 SPLIT LOOK
A) BOTH DE = 7
B) BOTH DT = 3
C) BOTH ILB = 10 Tech (OUTSIDE SHOE TO CROTCH OF OG
D) OLB's = SAME AS REGULAR (80 Tech. 3x3)
III. 5-3
A) BOTH OLB's = SAME AS REGULAR (80 Tech. 3x3)
B) BOTH DE's = 7
C) BOTH DT's = 3
D) NOSE (subbed for one ILB) = 0
E) MLB (best ILB) = 00 (stacked behind Nose)
IV. 60 TIGHT (SHORT YARDAGE & GL)
A) BOTH OLB's = 9
B) BOTH DE's = 5
C) BOTH DT's = 1 (AKA 2I)
D) BOTH ILB's = 10 Tech, (outside shoe to crotch of OG)
ALL contain techniques already taught in BASE 44! NO NEW LEARNING!
PS: The PROBLEM with playing a 1 (AKA 2I) on the backside with a 7 is that if the O-Line takes just enough split so that there is 2 to 2 1/2 YDS between the 1 & 7, they can KILL you in there with dives, leads, etc.
EMAIL ME AT: billmountjoy@yahoo.com & I'll send you a great article by Lou Holtz on WHY HE CHANGED FROM A 5-2 TO 4-4.
Good for you! Do what you know best, & can teach best.
Just curious - if you run a shade 5-2 Cover 3, & put the strength of the coverage to the shade side, how will you cover the backside flat? You can't very well drop the backside DE because that would leave only 1 rusher to that side & you NEED TWO! You would virtually have no pressure to the QB's backside, nor could you stop a draw to that side.
coach,
We will typically only shade our front to the TE when into the boundary. This way we put our SS to the field. If they set their TE to the field, we will simply be in our open defense. (Open - 3, 8, 30 ILB, SS as OLB).
If we did call Tight front while in the middle of the field, we would do one of three things:
1. Roll the SS away from the 9 technique in cover 3 (if no TE, our 9 technique would be in "walk" technique)
2. Play cover 4
3. "Tear" the TE side and "walk" our 9 technique off (shade to a 1, 5 to a 7) and play cover three with Sam backer in flats on one side, SS in flats to opposite side.
Hope this makes sense. Let me know if you see any holes.
Thanks
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.
This is going to be an incomplete thought, and I wish I could offer more info, but this is all I know right now. The best football program in our state bases out of a 5-2, but will adjust to a 4-3 or 4-2 based on the team they are playing and the types of plays they see out of certain formations. For instance, if a team will run the ball out at them with the traditional run plays out of a 2 back set, they will play their 5-2, which looks pretty much like a basic okie defense. The front 7 attack the man over them and read their block. This is their base defense.
They will put their best "sand lot" type of kid, not their best athlete, but the one who really loves and understands the game at right DE. They claim he is the only player who really changes responsibility / technique in the other two defensive looks. I believe they will put him as an invert type of player in the 4-3 defense and the FREE SAFETY in their 4-2. I really like this concept since it is very close to what we do.
There is a team in my state-- OHIO, who runs a 52. They are a national powerhouse at the D1 level. They are ranked in the top 15 nationally every year. They always stay in a 52 but must adjust somehow to various formations, spread teams, etc. Their nose and 5 technique move on every single snap. I just do not know how they make their calls, etc.
Cincinnati Colerain
52 defense
Triple Option offense
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.
I run Colerain's offense and defense. They are always in a 4 shell and roll to cover 3. They will roll weak and strong....so both DE's must learn how to drop into coverage. The will always angle away from the roll and defend the field. His DVD on the 50 is good and basic...I am telling you they are vanilla. There are a lot of coaches on here who think they are better and more superior than those that believe in the tried and true of 52 C3, 4, or 2. The will never change their front unless 3 backs in backfield and then they become a 62. Again, a lot oc coaches on here will tell you that you can not adjust with the 52....they are wrong. I live in Ohio and if you check our the number of State Champions over the last decade in all divisions you will see a majority are in Odd Fronts.
IC, I like to personally tell you my bad...I thought that you were talking about aligning in cover 3 no matter what out of your 50 front....I did not know that you were rolling into it out of quarters...I have true 50 Slant pedigree as well...My high school Coach played at Mount Carmel in Chicago, and he has close ties with the Michigan Staff...A buddy of mine was Kerry Comb's DC at Colerein for a couple of years before taking a head coaching position in Louisville KY, which is our home town........Do what you do........
The topic of this discussion was "SIMPLE SYSTEM" (5-2 vs. 4-4):
Pursuant to THAT topic, Of COURSE you CAN adjust out of a 5-2 - I ran it for 23 years on all three levels! It is just far HARDER to adjust out of a 5-2 than a 4-4 (that's a "no brainer"). Ask Lou Holtz (who ran Woody Hayes' 5-2 for him at Ohio St in Woody's GREAT years) WHY he changed from a 5-2 to a 4-4. It was ALL about adjustments.
I can remember Tom Osborne's GREAT Nebraska teams in the 70's, 80's & early 90's (with Monte Kiffin as "DC") dropping the 5-2 for a 4-3 for some of the SAME reasons.
The MASTER "5-2" Coach in the NFL was Bill Arnsparger ("DC" under Shula with the Dolphins). In Super Bowl XVII - The Redskins shift package (AKA "EXPLODE") confused the Dolphins 5-2 so bad, that it cost them the game. See this exerpt from an old article:
TAKEN FROM A S.I. ARTICLE ANBOUT SUPER BOWL XVII:
Some of Gibbs' stuff had confused the Dolphins enough to keep them from overplaying Riggins. The topper was the particularly zany Explode Package, in which the five eligible pass receivers lined up in strange places, jumped into different locations and took their prescribed one-second pause. As usual, a receiver then went in motion.
"We put it in at 3:30 a.m. Thursday morning," Washington offensive coordinator Joe Bugel said. "It was at the end of our coaches' meeting. We were trying to think of something special. Someone would make a suggestion. It didn't click. Then someone would make another. We'd have a cup of coffee, a candy bar. All of a sudden Coach Gibbs said, 'How about moving everybody?' And one guy said, 'Now you're talking.' And the Explode Package was born. That morning at 10 o'clock we presented it to the team. Coach Gibbs diagrammed it and said, 'Men, we call this Explode!' and there was this yell throughout the room: 'Yeeahhh!' It sure got their attention."
The Skins used the Explode about five times and got two short touchdown passes out of it, a four-yarder to Garrett in the second quarter and the final TD, a six-yarder to Brown, at the end of the game. Both came out of an alignment in which the two little guys started out together, almost in single file, then split and crossed into the end zone. Both times the coverage was close. Maybe the formation provided a split second's indecision, maybe it didn't, but it didn't hurt.
Gerald Small, the right cornerback, ended up with the coverage on both touchdowns. The first one was a little fade pattern, in which Garrett ran to a spot and Theismann dropped the ball on him. The second was a crisscross in which Brown started inside and then cut for the corner. Small caught up to him the moment the ball arrived and gave him a mighty push out of bounds, but the official ruled Brown had been forced out, and the touchdown stood.
The point is that however they did it, the Redskins wound up with the coverage they wanted both times -- Small on the hot receiver.
Some of the wrinkles were more subtle. Warren, the regular tight end, occasionally would go in motion. Rick Walker, the second tight end, who sets up behind the line and who had been going in motion all year, stayed put.
"It's the first time we did that all year," Gibbs said. "The idea of the reverses, the flea-flickers, the Explode, was to keep them loose, to keep them from getting after John. We wanted a situation where John could get decent yardage on first down so we wouldn't have to throw when they were expecting it. In the second half we accomplished that. Give the offensive line credit for a lot of that.
This is my last post on this subject. Each of you should simply run what YOU like best!!!!!!!!!!!
That is an excellent article and point that you make. If Bill Arnsbarger and his Dolphins cant figure out how to adjust to multiple formations and shifts, then Im sure it would be difficuilt at the HS level.
Coach,
They have been running the midline, isv, osv for at least 10 years. They have videos out now. The head coach, Kerry Coombs, just took an assistant position with the Univ. of Cincy. I believe this has caused other coaches to pursue head coaching jobs. I know the former O coordinator-- Rick Haynes, stepped down at least temporarily prior to this last season.
They play fantastic defense. They have been running the 50 forever.
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.