Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Coaches,
What have you experienced more success using in goaline? Out offense runs a version of the spread where we throw the ball and run option. We had difficulty against them last year running man:
1. pitch man's in man coverage and gets ran off.
2. they pick the heck out of us even if we stagger depth.
What do you consider more effective?
Thanks
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.
Whatever YOU believe in. Something not too far from your BASE. Our 4-2-5 adjusts to the standard GL defenses most play (OLB's in tight 9; DE's in tight 5 or a 4; DT's in a 1; ILB's in a 30 - inside shoe to crotch on OG). Everybody but the OLB's play these techniques in BASE anyway. Secondary can be tight man Cover 0, OR, a ROBBER (both of which are in our BASE package)!
Take a look at George Hill's Ohio St Goal Line vs option - he was primarily zone. He was always GOOD vs Veer & Bone on GL!
Ditto: Erk Russell at Georgia, & Georgia Southern - he was primarily man (he tried to get the Safety on the pitch, and used a "Banjo" technique vs "picks" which had men SWITCHING responsibility).
This is all too much to type - if you want a copy of man AND zone GL TECHNIQUES - email me at:
billmountjoy@yahoo.com
THe only man not covered in straight man is the QB, why would you have any difficulty covering the pitch man? Just curious as to what your thinking is.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Coach E - For us, we almost always have a DB taking the pitch man. This is either the FS position when we are playing man or the flat player in zone.
Teams that put 4 quick receivers and run option have made us be ready to play some sort of zone at least some of the time. Otherwise we might go to some kind of cover 0 look with the 4 DBs, and move a LB to the MOF to play the FS position (mirror the HB and play pitch, drop to MOF to help on pass reads).
If you decide to play man on the goaline and a team runs a spread option and implements a crack on the pitchman, the defender covering the crack blocker will take himself out of the play.
Even if you attempt press technique, the offense will use motions so that you are unable to press a motion from a wide flanker.
Am I missing something?
We had a hell of a time stopping our own offense last year.
If you can "stop the run", the offense becomes predictable.
quote: Originally posted by: stoptherun If you decide to play man on the goaline and a team runs a spread option and implements a crack on the pitchman, the defender covering the crack blocker will take himself out of the play.
Even if you attempt press technique, the offense will use motions so that you are unable to press a motion from a wide flanker.
Am I missing something?
We had a hell of a time stopping our own offense last year.
That is why you can't always play man vs an option team, especially one that has 4 quicks. We have played an inverted cover 2 in these situations, along with man.
CUI - I have misplaced your email address. I'll send you the GL package.
Remember - A GREAT Flexbone coach showed me that there are about 27 different options that can be run from an INFINITE number of formations. We can NEVER get into all of them. There are generalities I can share (the rest you will have to work out for yourselves).
This is BASIC vs BOTH Splitback Veer, & the Wishbone (I got this from Erk Russell who won National Titles in his Flexbone): He was a GREAT teacher of GL (ask TIGER-1):
R (OLB) & S have a read on TE: NOTE: on backside if there is a TE & no WR - backside Corner plays like S in above example.
R = TIGHT 9. S = 1 1/2 yds outs. TE & 2-3 yds deep):
1. TE blocks down = R tackles 6 hole (PROBABLY dive back). S has pitch on option and dump pass to TE who will not be permitted an inside release by R). (R MUST keep TE from blocking LBer).
2. TE reaches outside = R works outside & has pitch. S has QB on option.
3. E butts R = R plays a 9 & forces TE towards ball. S reads ball.
4. ILB reads play. On wide veer path - shuffle towards 6 hole. After checking dive - attack the QB IMMEDIATELY. On tight veer path - work from dive to QB to pitch.
5. Corner plays TOUGH INSIDE MAN & will NOT let the WR in to crack, etc.
Cannot type anymore on this. Email me if you need more detail. IF you rep the HELL out of this - you will be VERY SOUND on option.
NOTE: If Z motioned to crack S - C would close down with him - make a "CRACK" call to S - & attack pitch IMMEDIATELY. S would turn & "ear hole" the WR! S is always our TOUGHEST OLB. We have ALSO turned S's back (by align) to the crack - drawing a clip! There are some VERY GOOD STUNTS (changeups) such as CRASHING S inside hard toward the near hip of the near B & with R "holding" TE, etc.
The OLBs would align in a 6 or 7 tech. if they have a free corner behind them, they will shoot the C-gap, if not they will have the TE man-to-man. Against trips, WLB would be the adjuster (unless the off side has a TE in which case the CB would adjust).
CBs have #1 unless forced over by formation
This is not unlike to ODP but I have moved the DTs to 3 techs to shore up the middle vs. a QB sneak. Obviously, you would still need a tough kid at nose.
You need to get some 411 on the 46 by Rex Ryan....This is what you have drawn up....I like the look because everyone is up close and personal with the Offense, and this Applies Pressure....
We base out of the 46 so that was my starting point along with the ODP. I agree that Rex Ryan is an authority on the defense. I have his book and just lent his DVD (converted from the old tapes) to Deac14.
Heretofore, our goal line package has been to simply take out the FS and replace him with a DL, then go 3113 with our down linemen instead of 303. Which do like better?
When I coached in College - we brought Buddy Ryan HIMSELF in to spend one whole day with out staff. Tony Dungy was there also!
He admitted that ADJUSTING to the following formation was a "BITCH"! The speed option on the 5 technique, or the counter-trey trapping the 5 was TOUGH!
In Cover 1 (his BASE coverage) he was always a man short on SE side (in the running game)!
I based ALL my Offensive Game Plans vs teams that ran that on what HE revealed to our Defensive Staff was the "problem areas" in the defense. I still have his "formation adjustment" sheets, as well as my game plan VS that style defense.!
Bill is 100 percent correct when he said ERK RUSSEL wsa a defensive master on the goal line! Once asked him why he did not work something out to alleviate himself being a man short on the backside and he told me he was going with the percentages that most teams are going to concentrate and run behind their strength down close and I think he was very much correct! The game lost a great coach upon his demise of a few years ago.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Out of the 46 cover 1, weakside option is difficult to defend, secondary help (FS) must be involved. We have gotten pretty good at stopping the counter trey. Out of a one back set it is tough to pull the guard and tackle as there is no FB to fill. Some teams will pull the guard and H-back but this tips off the SLB who is man to man on him. The key is for the playside 3 tech. to obstruct the OG long enough to free up the MLB.
As far as GOALLINE defense this is how what I am suggesting would look vs. that formation:
The playside ILB should be free to take QB and the DE would take pitch. We should be OK as long as the playside 3 tech. does not get reached (in which case we need a new 3 tech. not a new scheme).
I would be grateful for yours or anyones thoughts on this as I am considering using this for the upcoming season.
Buddy didn't adjust his BEAR 46 vs that formation like that - it's altogether different. He "MATCHED UP" in his Cover 1. All I can tell you is that you have to be able to ADJUST vs ALL formations. It must be simple & understandable. When Buddy Ryan spent a day with our staff - MUCH of it was adjusting the BEAR 46 to various formations.
I know how BUDDY does it, & would be glad to forward it to you via email or discuss via phone. There is no way to explain it by typing - it is too deep!
PS: I've seen the BEARE 46 2-3 times a year since 1985, but, as to the option weak - OT down blocks the 3, OG folds on LBer (who is frozen when the QB backs out 2 steps before attacking the DE), & QB options DE! Also: how do you get by on the GL 2-gapping the Nose? QB sneaks would be devastating!
ALSO: We flex H out 5 yds 50% of the time in that formation. It WEAKENS the defense to that side not only in coverage - but runs to that side as well. We do not pull the G & T on Counter/Power. we pull the G & EITHER H or Y (depending on formation).
Darrell - hope you get something out of the Buddy Ryan material I sent. That is how he writes up his ADJUSTMENTS in his playbook. MUST BE SIMPLE & CONSISTENT. He used the "Cover 1/Match Up".
I would be interested to see that Buddy Ryan material. Please send to:
SOrndoff@adelphia.net
You are right about two-gapping the nose in goal line. I would not do that if they were down very close. IF we go to this alignment for goalline I would have the nose take one A gap and send a LB to the other or just sub in a DL when they are that close.
We do have rules and adjustments to all formations. I think we are sound but maybe some can be improved. For example, thanks to you, our adjustment to a full house set has improved greatly as we were just sitting in a 5-3 and now use the much better ODP.