Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Coaches:
Let me start by saying that I have learned a great deal from your posts on this board.
I have a question and would appreciate your advice. We are a 4-4 defense. I have two strong, quick, DE candidates. I have been thinking about placing the more athletic of the two at weakside OLB (and stunting him a lot) and placing the other one at weakside DE. The DE to the TE side would be a "big body" with good feet. As I mentioned, the OLB is athletic, but I would not want him to have to cover a slot reciever man-to-man, and I do not want to be forced into having the FS play #2 all the time.
My other option is to put both players at DE and play someone at weak OLB who is decent athlete, but again not necessarily a guy I want to cover a slot receiver. I feel as if I am between a rock and a hard place.
What do you feel would be the best utilization of my personnel?
In my versionof the 4-2-5 we have the contain responsibility placed directly on the twin safties who are aligned 3 yds deep and 5 yds off, not the DE's. In addition to their contain responsibility on a sweep or a QB trying to beat them on the perimeter, they have pitch on the option and flats on the pass. We are sending our DE's directly to the QB and hoping to sandwich him on any pass drop back situation. I call our twin safeties TIGER BACKS ( you call them OSLB's in your 4-4) and I always keep my free safety directly in the middle of the field in order to keep it closed in the PSL to discourage the QB from wanting to throw in there! We also allude to them as DB's and not Line Backers, thus we are in a nickel at all times. In order to jump into our dime package, we just replace a LB with a true DB.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
As Bill so aptly states, your DE's and LB'S ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT GUYS ON THE DEFENSE IN YOUR 4-4 SCHEME. With you stating that neither outside LB is the type you want covering a down field receiver, you do have a problem. That is why I say that my Tiger Backs have to be the best payers and not the DE's. THey always have the # 2 receiver to either side in any man cover scheme we may be in. They absolutely have to be able to run with and cover a TE or a wideout. THIS IS IMPERATIVE TO ME. don't know how this would work for you, but you may want to try one guy who is the better cover guy against the teams you know are throwing teams and a more physical type against the running teams you will face.
If you don't have the personnel to fill the bill all the way, then go with your next best alternative. Would be very interested in knowing how it plays out for you, keep us posted if you have time, OK?
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Agree with Bill 100% on what he says about you put SS types who do not have to cover deep in his defense. Some think that my version of the 4-2-5 is just semantics, and granted, some of it is (calling OSLB's Tiger Backs(DB's) instead of LB's. But, it goes much farther than that with my philosophy in as much as our Tiger Backs have to have much better pass covering skills than most LB's, becuae they do cover deep.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE