Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
We are having a little trouble defending 2 tight with our G front. G front being DT's in a 1 tech and a 3 DE's in a 7 strong and 5 weak OLB's in 90 weak and 80 strong and ILB's are both 30 tech's. Problem we are having is ISO to the weakside. Any Idea's?
DT/SE SIDE moves from a 1 Technique to a 3 Technique.
TECHNIQUES OF NOSE & MLB:
NOSE: Head up on Center. Two gap responsibility – OT to OT – both A gaps. Use two hand incline press on Center.
MLB: 4 yards deep behind Center. Two gap responsibility – OT to OT – both A gaps. Read FB thru OG’s. Use inside flipper on blockers. Vs Pass – Hook to Curl (read QB’s eyes. – go strong side to a depth of 10 yards).
#4. Stay with DT in a 1 & DE in a 7. IF a team doesn't split so that the distance between the 1 & 7 is no more than 2 or 2 1/2 yds. - you will be able to handle the ISO (ILB shoots B gap on cue & meets ISO blocker in the backfield if he approaches B gap). Go DOUBLE ROBBER to get 10 in the box (BELOW):
WILL LB = 60 OR 90 (OR 9 IF “TIGHT CALL WEAK) ROBBER COVERAGE
S/C = ROBBER COVERAGE (#1)
F/S = ROBBER (KEY STRONG TE #2) LINE UP ON OT YOUR SIDE.
W/C = ROBBER TECHNIQUE (KEY WEAK TE #1). LINE UP IN C GAP YOUR SIDE. NOTE: ON BOOT – COVER WEAK TE IN FLAT BECAUSE WILL MAY BE PULLED INSIDE WITH FAKE; OTHERWISE PLAY THE “ROBBER” TEHNIQUE SAME AS F/S.
9317 line techs. 12, 22, and 32 personel. Set the 9 tech away from the passing strength. 7 tech is your Stud DE, 9 tech is your Evil DE. 3 is the Nose and 1 is the Tackle. Its the "UNDER" G front used for Field Zone blitzes too where the Evil backer can drop out in coverage so you can send 4 -wide an still be protected from the quickie back side.
Set the backers TO the passing strength. Rover-3x4 off TE, Sam-30, Mike-30, Will-70
Line is set solidly to play the run weak. The weak side of the line is now strengthened by the backers being overshifted.
Robber coverage is really good too because you can now get the 9th man in the box.
Penn State set it this way as well as Boise State. I saw them both at Atlantic city today and it was my first question this morning.
Coach, we've begun using the split 4-4 scheme, which against double-tight, puts us in this look
DTs = 3 tech.
DEs = 7 and 9 tech. - 1/2 yard outside the end offensive lineman (2 pt. stance)
Rover and Gunner = 8 tech. (head up on the TE - outside foot foward - step hard to the c gap and jam the TE) This keeps our inside linebackers free most often.
Sam and Will = 4.5 yards off the line and stacked on the guards
We've found this creates many problems with an offense's blocking schemes, and encourages them to run toward the A-gaps, which is exactly what we want. We spend quite a bit of time working half-line drills with special emphasis on trap and iso.
The best way for us to defend a steady diet of Dbl Tight(Also use this in short yardage situations and on the Goal Line.) is to get into a 5 man front as stated by Coach Easton. We have played the 5-3 look in the past but had great success last year playing a 5-4 scheme. Will sub out a perimiter player and bring in another DT. We align the 3 DT's head up on the Center and 2 guards. The DT(Nose) player over the center will stem to a 1 Tech to the Strong side as our base. The DE on the strong side plays a 9 tech. DE on the weakside is in a 5 tech even if Dbl Tight. We then have about 6 calls from this front, we will usually slant the 3 DT's strong or weak. We will also Jet(Wide 9) or Blood(Slant DE inside striking OT) the Str DE and have blitzes bringing either one or both inside backers.
Coach Easton, I know it is against your philosophy to bring the FS out of the MOF but we play Cover 0 behind it. Corners #1, Outside Backers #2. Vs. empty Will backer covers #3.
What I thought was the advantage of this scheme was keeping 2 inside backers in the middle and they read and play the same as in our base with the exception of knocking down or covering backs out.
We even used this against Spread teams in short yardage, goalline and a change up. Matches up great. Most spread teams(at least in our league) do not see a 5 man front. It gave spread teams we played last year some trouble.
As long as it works for y'all, and you are having good luck with it, I would definitely hang with it. I just prefer man free over cover #0, but that is just me. As long as whatever you choose to run in the secondary, just make sure it compliments your front, it sounds like a plan to me.
Coach Easton-TIGER ONE
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
In our 5 man front we also get 10 in the box and we are sound against the pass. However, it is a gamble playing cover 0 but we use this on the goal line and in short yardage.
_____________________________________ O
_____________________________________ O
Corners have #1, OB's #2. Mike and Will read guards to backs as in base calls, the only difference is they are taught to cover or knock down a back out to their side. I prefer a 5 man front over a 4 man front in short yardage and goal line. The TNT is head up and we will slant them strong or weak. We rarely sit with our front and if we are not slanting we are stemming and changing the front look. If we were to slant weak then the strong side DE would Blood inside attacking the OT. We can then blitz either Mike or Will or even both Mike and Will in some situations. Usually anytime the Offense is inside the 5 yard line. This was a change up last year from the 5-3 look and we played the best short yardage and goal line defense that we ever have. I had a lot of confidence in this scheme and it was a big part of our defense.