Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by Coast Union 33 on Feb 15, 2008 11:40:41 GMT
Ok fellas, I'm getting a rush of spread option stuff over the last two years. What is everyone doing to defend the shotgun, oneback, spread option game that everyone seems to want to run these days. Slanting my DE's is a double edged sword, it's great if they get counter away and they are pinching inside but it is terrible when they are slanting out and get counter at them. I've pinched the DE's both at the same time but they can hurt you vs. the pass. What is everyone doing against this stuff? What coverages and what do you do with your defensive line?
Coast Union, when our D-End slants to one gap, and backer or a flank(spur) has other....So when you pinch your End in2 B, somebody has to exchange gaps with him and attack C....Gap first, Ball second.....When you slant to your D-end, insteaad of having him loop outside, have him attack the outside shouulder of the tackle just has he would aligned in a 5 tech....This will allow him to play the veer release of the OT much more effectively..........As 4 coverage, reroute all receivers (not just the slots), and get pressure on the Qb by overloading the offensive protection.....4 example, when they give you a 2 by 2 set with the back off set to one side, the back sets the protection....There4, if you aligned your sam outside the OT, and stacked your Will behind the OT(strong side), you could slant away from the Back, which would bring your End in2 B, your Sam off the edge, and your will would be the loader in C with Sam.....Shoot me an e-mail if you wish to get in depth with it...........coachack@bellsouth.net
Post by Coast Union 33 on Feb 18, 2008 21:19:13 GMT
We have those basic rules in place. What blitzes do you like against this offensive scheme? We sent the short spur/bandit a lot last year. The guy that really hurt us was the QB out in space. We cross-read the LBs on him and the RB in shot-gun. We had trouble with our spur/bandit on the re-route out in space getting off of the block to get to the QB on QB counter play.
We utilize line directions...This changes up Option Responsibilities hopefully to our adavantage....When the Offense knows who has what on any given down they will EXPLOIT your weakest link....As 4 your spur playing qb on the counter, what are your Backer responsibilities versus counter?
Post by Reaper Defense Coach on Feb 19, 2008 7:49:27 GMT
Against zone option we split the feild in half and key the oppisite back so the side away from the QB is going to key him likewise on the running back out Mike and nose handle the A gaps while the ends and stacks take their responibility. our spurs are also going to have the same responsibility but they will be a little late depending on the formation. We slant every down so we teach the nose to try to roll a pulling gaurd or tackle or both if he is slanting into them thereby screwing up the blocking assignments. We did not see a lot of pulling because of this. Remember to tell your guys that they need to make sure their responsibility is on the ground every play if they do this the offense will become less effective because they will not carry out their play fakes.
You may be a King or a Street Sweeper but everyone dances with the Grim Reaper
Post by Coast Union 33 on Feb 19, 2008 14:34:50 GMT
I guess the question I'm asking is what blitzes do you like and what coverages. We are for the most part speaking the same language and doing some of the same things. Are you guys playing base on run downs and taking a few more chances on passing downs? Most of the things that I've read above won't account for a very good pass rush. You can tell I've truly turned into a 3-3 guys over the last 5 seasons when I think 4 guys can't get to the QB in time.
I've seen that the 3-3 is the most versatile defense vs the spread. We too keyed the far back. I think the DE's are a key in dealing with this offense. They need to control the tackles, and if the OT pulls, they HAVE to get into the hip pocket and get down the line. The other thing I've learned with the spread--especially spread teams that like to run the ball. Make them beat you with the pass, and get pressure on the backfield!
Ryan Kelly
Offensive Coordinator
Austin High School
Austin, MN
There is nothing that will show a man's true character like the 2 yard line.
We bring 4 man heat about 60 %, and 5 man 30%, and 3 man would be the remaing 10....We have success getting pressure on the Trigger Man by overloading the offensive protection, but we still bring 4 the majority of the time.....I'm about wining mano y mano match ups...The Angles we come from, matched with the Acceleration allow 4 us to be very DISRUPTIVE..IMO it's all about disruption, not getting sacks.....As 4 coverage, it's a quarters concept; however, we want it to look like Man....So instead of sitting back at 7 yds on the corner, we roll up and squat at 4 to 5 yds....Our Flanks would do the same...We want to collision, and get in phase with he WR B4 we get into a zone.....We Trade off any IN and Outs that occur B4 5 yds......For example, if 1 runs a slant, and 2 is vertical, the corner would give the IN trade off to the Flank and the corner would be over top of the vertical by number 2...Mike is in the Low Hole, Free has the High Hole....So as u can see, it's a little of this mixed with a little of that, but to keep confusion down we call it quarters.....We will use various alignments to get to it....1 safety look...2 safety look....0 safety look......Remember it's not what you do, but how it's done that makes you effective...... :light;
Post by Coast Union 33 on Jul 22, 2008 9:54:52 GMT
Can we revisit this topic? So Ack, you wouldn't collision with corners in Cover 3 would you. In fact, I'm only going to run Cover 3 when on the hash mark. I feel vulnerable in cover 3 vs. a two-by-two set in the middle of the field despite the fact that you get good re-routes of the #2 WR. It's just ugly. I think my problem is that the two gun option spread teams that we faced last year were just flat out better than us. (They actually played for our section title.) It wouldn't have mattered what we did scheme-wise...