Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
What type of blitzes do you guys feel work the best against the basic offtackle play. TE goes to linebacker and fullback is kicking out the dog (spur).
Post by Coast Union 33 on Aug 15, 2008 4:01:44 GMT
The N. Mexico Storm Blitz. Send the Tight side backer and spur off of the TE side edge, one in the C gap and one off the edge, roll the FS to replace the spur in the flat and roll the backside spur to the FS middle spot. Hope for no weak side run...
Play your ends on the outside shoulder of Tackle (5 tech or 6 tech depending on how you call it.)
TE will probably double on your End. If not, this is very easy for your end to spill this play. If FB is told to look for your spur, Someone has to take your end. If FB takes your end, your spur is unblocked. If you are worried about your A and B gap, don't. It is a very easy read for your LBers. GRD blocks down and OT blocks out, the window opens and the LBers fill. This is what I've seen West Virginia do. Watch their game versus OU last year.
OR
Slant and hit this thing aggressively with blitzes. Depends on your personality. If it was me, it'd slant strong and bring my SAM. You never know what another team really is going to do, so you have to be sound on the weakside.
NOTE to Coast Union 33: Remember my "Ball Hawking Fool". He is tearing it up. I'm able to be much more aggressive with an athlete like that at Safety. I'm now training my 9th grade coaches and JV coaches to work on a few other Basketball players. In the past, i would have put these kids (6'6 skinny power forwards or 3 GRDS) at Weakside end in a 43 (my defense 2 years ago). Now, I'm using them all over in my secondary in a 33 stack. They also make great spurs when I'm blitzing or jumping into any over and under looks. Thanks for the tip. It now seems like a "no-brainer".