Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Anyone have any success with playing both a 3-5-3 and a 4-2-5? I'm thinking about adding a 3-5-3 package to the 4-2-5 base we run.
Is it hard to teach both. We are at the high school level in a state where we only get 5 contact days in the offseason. Our kids also go both ways. I'll have 20 - 30 varsity kids on any given year.
Anyone who has experience doing this, if you could give me your thoughts, I would appreciate it.
"Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go."
Coach, what you are doing is allowing yourself to place the best Football Player on the field....If it's a backer...d-lineman...db then so be it.....It gets confusing when the concepts change....If you keep the concepts solid, I do not think that you will have a problem....When the concepts stay the same, all you are doing is changing formations, and adding personnel packages......:beer;
Coach, I've run a wide 44...basically a 42. We did have a 33 stack package that we ran against a spread passing team, but it was highly simplistic, and was simply used as a blitz package since their offensive line was not great. It worked for us, but we ran our same coverages from it, and we did not, by any means, run that 33 to its fullest capabilities. Frankly, if you have an abundance of OLB types, run the 33 and install everything. If you have a defensive line that can control the LOS, go with the 42, in my opinion. But as Coach Ack says, don't run both systems. Run one or the other, and you can stem to odd/even looks from them.
Ryan Kelly
Offensive Coordinator
Austin High School
Austin, MN
There is nothing that will show a man's true character like the 2 yard line.
we are a 4-2-5 team strictly but we did play with a package where we would shift into a 3-3-5 look. We strictly blitzed out of it and stayed in a basic cover 3 to keep it simple. We had 3 blitz calls and thats it. we never changed our personnel from the 4-2-5, we simply shifted our Stg DE to the Mike spot and he blitzed the a-gap everytime.
CoachFord,
Did you find that people would recognize what you were doing when you shifted into that look and try to take advantage of it? We have tried to do things with different looks at times and sometimes it's tough to tell if the advantages outweigh the amount of time it takes to get it repped so the kids are good at it and also to do enough different things out of it so the other team doesn't say, OK they are in this front so we know this is coming etc. We are seldom athletic enough to just line up and beat up on someone so we have to try to be sneaky sometimes.
Post by Coach Campbell on Feb 12, 2009 19:08:56 GMT
Coach we run the 3-5-3 and 4-2-5 as our base schemes both feature a 6 man box with a outside invert to each side which equals an 8 man front. The two go very well with each other. Coach Campbell
we shift to this look maybe 6 times during a game that we decide to use it. There has been times where i wouldn't show this look for a few weeks. To answer your question, o-coords rarely knew it was coming so we would have success using it for the most part.