Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Interesting, we are very much a pressure oriented football team tho so it is impossible to go into a game with that few calls, although I do respect the concept greatly.
We also call strength 6 different ways so there are 6 variations to each play
Tight (Set the strenth/stunt into the tightend)
Open (strength/stunt set away from tightend)
Deuce (Strength set to the two cut side, Split End- slot always takes prioritie over Y,Z. If doubles call to the QB's passing strength.
Ace (Single Receiver side)
Field
Boundry
Problem with a lot of calls is how do you find time to REP them properly? It is EXECUTION that is more important than trying to "fool someone". You have to REP all you calls vs. ALL their formations, shifts, motions, etc. TAKES TIME!!!!!!!
When Spurrier was at Florida - they won a National Championship (mid 1990's) taking 4-5 calls into a game!
This is also true but as we learned from Dave Aranda who is at Hawaii we have certain calls for certain personel groups.
We only have to rep that stunt against a certain player package. This obviously doesnt work if a team doesnt sub which some high school offenses dont, but most of the teams we face do.
So we have our Blitzes ussually mapped out by personel.. 22,12,10,11 what have you. This saves us time in practice because we dont have to practice our slide stunt vs. 22 personnel if we know we are only going to be running it vs 11.
As far as having 6 variations based on strength that does not affect practice time. Where we set the strength doesnt affect the blitz so it doesnt take more practice time.
We have put alot of thought into not giving our kids to much especially at the high school level and we have yet to run into a problem. Of course we start them off small, and the more advanced they get the more we add.
This is also why its so important to have a Freshman/JV programs that are running the same system as the varsity so they are being coached up on the system from a young age.
Having coached HS, College, & Pro levels (for over 40 years) - I have found that you use less on each level (coming down).
The MAIN thing I learned in my experience (to quote the great "Bear" Bryant) - the defense that "OUT-MEANS" it's opponent will WIN - no matter how many calls it has! The more calls you have - the more tenative & the less AGGRESSIVE a team tends to be!!! Football always has been (& always will be) a PHYSICAL game that transcends the "X's" & "O's"!
The "BEAR'S" favorite locker room speech was: "Put a smile on your face - go out & hit somebody - knock em down - help em up & pat em on the back - tell them not to go away cause you'll be right back" - & run back to your huddle.!
PS: We NORMALLY took 4 calls into a game:
1. BASE 4-2-5 (plus it's ADJUSTMENTS which includes "sliding" to a 4-3 vs. 3x1 sets).
2. MAX BLITZ from base 4-2-5.
3. Short Yardage/Goal Line ("60").
4. MAX BLITZ from Short Yardage/Goal Line (same MAX BLITZ as we use from "BASE" except from the "tightened down" front ("60").
If this wasn't enough to get the job done - there were no other "magic wands" to wave!
No more typing time - if you wish to discuss in more detail - please PHONE me at 804-378-0116 (from 6 PM to 10 PM/EDT).
READ THE FOLLOWING:
September 24, 1962
A Turn To Toughness
Bear Bryant's rugged, winning ways at Alabama have the South looking to its defenses. But a mild dissenter, Georgia Tech, should edge the Tide
Mervin Hyman , Hal Peterson, Morton Sharnik
When Paul Bryant, whose rigid image (above) is enough to cause cholera among southern coaches, was at Texas A&M, his first out-of-state trip was to Athens, Ga., where he took a team of only 27 men. The Georgia writer who met him was incredulous. Was this mere handful all the players Bear Bryant had? "No," said The Bear casually. "This is all who want to play." In the 17 years of coaching that have taken him from Maryland to Kentucky to Texas A&M and, ultimately, to Alabama, his alma mater, there have been scores of hotshot athletes who defected from Bryant squads. "A boy's got to want to play awful bad to play here," says Bryant, and takes the uniforms from those who don't. "You work your silly head off," one ex-player put it. If it meant scrimmaging at half time to beat Auburn, Bear Bryant would scrimmage at half time.
The rewards for this unrelenting tedium are plain: great success at all points before Alabama, a national championship last year at Alabama (and, for Bryant, recognition as Coach of the Year). His critics excoriate him as an unscrupulous recruiter and ruthless opponent. His players (those who last) revere him—and, what's more, win for him. His rival coaches imitate him, not always liking it. "It's a hell-for-leather, helmet-bursting, gang-tackling game we play now in the Southeastern Conference," says Auburn's Shug Jordan. "Since Bear Bryant came back to Alabama it's the only game that can win." To all this, The Bear exudes a monumental disdain. Those few Alabama alumni who still dare to demand his time, for instance, are given two hours a day—from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. After that, he says, "I'll be busy."
Bryant has been very busy this spring and summer exercising one of his favorite ploys: touting the press off his Alabama team. " Georgia Tech," he said, "will be the No. 1 team in the nation," to which the redoubtable Bobby Dodd, head coach at Georgia Tech, replied: "That remark was typical of Bryant."
The fact is that when Alabama plays Georgia Tech on Nov. 17, the national title may well be at stake, for in the SEC, where spectators have become connoisseurs of defensive football by watching the expert stylings of such as Bryant, they say there is none better than these two. Unless it is Ole Miss. Or LSU. Or Tennessee. There is even talk of a grand sweep to approximate the golden season of 1942, when Georgia went to the Rose Bowl, Georgia Tech to the Cotton Bowl and Alabama to the Orange Bowl. Challenging the sovereignty of the SEC in the South for 1962 will be at least two teams of the Atlantic Coast Conference—Maryland and Duke—and the section's prime independent, Miami.
Because of Bryant, there will be more than the usual preoccupation with defense in the South, but not necessarily to the exclusion of change. There will, for example, be expanded use of the three-team system, with inspirational nomenclature—Tom Nugent of Maryland calls his three units the M Squad (first team), the Gangbusters (defensive specialists) and the Hustlers (offense). Bryant and Mississippi's Johnny Vaught are using their halfbacks interchangeably, as the situation demands, rather than designating some as right half, others as left. Some teams in the ACC are abandoning the Oklahoma 5-4 defense in favor of the pros' four-man front and combining zone with man-to-man coverage in the secondary. Duke has a double lonely end. Wake Forest will use wingbacks in motion. Nugent of Maryland will try anything. Andy Gustafson's stylings at Miami, keyed to more sophisticated Orange Bowl crowds, are strictly pro type.
Though their theories are often similar, the successful coaches of the South are remarkably different. There have been more character types in this section than there are in the Woodworth & Marquis college psychology text. Bryant is aloof and impenetrable. Dodd is a southern aristocrat ("In Dodd We Trust!" cry the citizens—or at least the publicists—of Atlanta). Paul Dietzel, who won his spurs at LSU before taking up with Army, woos and wins with an on-stage personality and sophomoric zeal, though his defensive tactics are as drab as the next. Tom Nugent is an engaging, perpetual-motion pitch man, and a nonconformist (he plays offense). Vaught of Ole Miss and well-dressed Ray Graves of Florida are organization men of a Madison Avenue cut. Frank Howard of Clemson is an unreconstructed hillbilly whose mark is a disheveled appearance and a corn-pone philosophy.
As Bryant suggests, Dodd of Georgia Tech has the best of the best material this year. "We've never had more good backs since I've been at Tech [32 years]," says Dodd himself. These include the admired sophomore with the undeniable name, Jefferson Davis. Davis, says one Tech coach, "has a fascination for the goal line." Much to Bryant's discomfort, Alabama was voted No. 1 by the SEC coaches, but this was before it lost Fullback Mike Fracchia by injury. 'Bama and Ole Miss can't quite equal Tech's manpower, but neither do they have to play Tech's rugged schedule. Alabama doesn't play much of anybody until it gets to Tennessee on Oct. 20. By then Bryant will be rolling. LSU's new coach, Charlie McClendon, was left scads of fine players by Dietzel (as Dietzel often reminds people), including a great halfback, Jerry Stovall. Ole Miss faces a modest rebuilding job with such monoliths as 260-pound tackle Jim Dunaway to cushion a possible fall. Tennessee, Auburn and Florida will be dangerous for anybody.
In the Atlantic Coast, a league of fine quarterbacks, it is Coach Bill Murray's remodeled Duke T with two quarterbacks (Walt Rappold and Gil Garner) over Maryland and its one (Dick Shiner). Resurgent West Virginia easily outstrips the Southern Conference. Independent Miami has the best quarterback in the South, perhaps in the country, in George Mira, but also has an impossible schedule. The top five: 1) Georgia Tech, 2) Alabama, 3) LSU, 4) Duke, 5) Miami and Ole Miss (tie).
Alabama
Bear Bryant, a dour man, drawled recently, "I must be one of the worst recruiters in America, I'm so bad, I've about given up." The other Southeastern coaches should have it so bad. Bryant will start at quarterback with Joe Namath, the country's leading schoolboy passer two years ago. He will also have Ray Ogden, a 6-foot-5, 218-pound halfback, and brilliant Center-Linebacker Gaylon McCollough, sophomores, too. These three, along with a large contingent of other first-year men, red-shirts and junior college transfers, fill out a squad already thick with game-winners. If there is one weakness, it is at fullback, where Mike Fracchia, the SEC's leading rusher last year, was expected to pick up where he left off in 1961. Fracchia injured his knee in practice and probably will miss the season. Defense, never a problem with Bryant-coached teams, could be better than it was last year when the Crimson Tide was the NCAA leader, allowing only 22 points.
CONCLUSION: For Bear Bryant, winning is as inevitable as the tide. Alabama could remain undefeated through one more season.
I compleatly understand the theory behind having fewer calls and I see the merit behind it.
However thats not how we do things.
From the freshman level on up our kids are learning the same schemes on both offense and defense. The freshman team probably does go in with 5-10 calls per game max. As our kids get older they get more added to their plates. But everything fits into the system and fitd within our rules. That is a big thing we focus on, we never add anything new if it breaks a rule.
Also most of the thickness of our playbook is do to variations to a single play...
As I stated before as coaches we have 6 different ways to call strength. This is not difficult for kids to learn considering field and boundary we call in the play. So if we want to set a blitz coming from the field and we are on the right has we simply call left blah blah blah. Anyways that multiples each call by 6. However learning how to identify the two receiver side, the side the tight end is or is not alligned to or finding the single receiver side should not be to much to ask for anyone who has half a brain.
Also a vast majority of our calls are just alterations or tags to a base play. So we have Base Cov.2, and then we have Base Cov.2 Stem, pinch, etc all just single buzz words that only effect one or two people.
The bottom line is we give our players a survey at the end of the year asking if they ever went into a game feeling unsure of their assignments, we didnt have one respond yes. Because we tell them at the begining of the season if there is something they are uncomfortable with we will throw it out and we have.
In 2007 we went into games with at most 94 calls and the least was 10. We ended up 12-0 giving up on 7.89 yards a game it was effective. But that team went through the program a full 4 years and had the stuff down.
This past year we were at a new skill and averaged anywhere from 15-20 a game. Depends on how you teach it and how much experiance people have with in the system(coachs and players both)
I wish we could max blitz and 0 cover as our base blitzing scheme but we just dont have the players to cover people like that. We have some 0 stuff but do it mostly for run purposes. Early on we got our eyes shot out in 0 blitz and quarters because we didnt have kids that can run everywhere with wide receivers. Thats why we adapted zone blitz and cov.2 and 3. Ended 07 with 27 INT's
This past year we had more athletic DB's so we did open up our 0 blitz package a bit more.
What are you running as your coverage behind your 4-2-5?
If your approach is working for you - by all means don't change!!! We need not discuss that further.
To answer your question: Our 4-2-5 played with "Cover 1" (if they have 3, 4, or 5 wideouts). That checks to "Robber" vs. 1 or 2 wideouts (we play the Corners the same in BOTH). We also can play Cover 2 IF NEED BE from our 4-2-5 - but prefer not to.
Max Blitz = Cover 0 all the way.
With only this - we won 53 of the last 60 games we played. In our last 3 seasons - we were 27-3 (with 22 shutouts; giving up only 93 points - only 2 TD passes, in last 30 games! Many of the 93 points we gave up in those last 30 games were by reserves when we were comfortably ahead.
Coach Pierson (who is on this site) played on these teams, & can verify the stats. Of course - having a LBer like James Farrior (leading tackler for the World Champion Steelers) didn't hurt. We had two more follow him - Byron Thweatt (played for the Bucs & the Titans in the NFL), & Matt Farrior (Parade All-American & starting ILB for the Florida Gators a few years ago). These people didn't care about X & O - thery just wanted to "knock the snot" out of anyone in a wrong color jersey!
PS: "My approach to the game has been the same at all places I've been - "VANILLA" - the SURE way. That means first of all, to win PHYSICALLY. If you get eleven on the field, and they beat the other eleven PHYSICALLY, they'll win! You'll force mistakes, & wear them out by the 4th quarter". (PAUL "BEAR" BRYANT).
"Out-manuever them - no". Intimidate (defeat) them physically - YES"! ("BEAR" BRYANT)
Cover 2 is WEAK VS A GOOD RUNNING TEAM! That is a CONSENSUS in College & Pro Ball. That is why Peyton Manning comes to the LOS with a package for ONE SAFETY DEEP (usually passing to a WR who is "1 on 1" on the outside), AND, a package for TWO SAFETIES DEEP (usually running the Inside Zone).
Coach - I would love to discuss this with you further - but I cannot type too well, & I don't spend but 1 hour a day (5 days a week) online.
Would much prefer to discuss this via PHONE (804-378-0116 - from 7 PM to 10 PM/EDT).
I don't know who told you that - but if you line up in 2 TE's & 2 Flankers - Cover 2 is AWFUL in the following situations:
1. Split WR's at least 15 yds (taking Corners with them). Run the Outside Zone (AKA: "Stretch") in the "alley" & there is NO WAY the Corner can run support (beat WRs block & get back that far inside). 2 Deep SAFETIES are NOT run support people, & they cannot cover deep halves & be in a position to "fill" the alley wide! You would have a "FIELD DAY" with play action if they even tried!!!!!!!
2. With the 2 TE's & 2 WR's (vs. Cover 2) - they have only 7 men to defend 8 gaps in the running game.
PS: You may be the only coach I ever heard defend Cover 2 vs. the run! Cover 4 is much better - if you want 2 safeties back!
I am a H.S. coach however like you I have visted College and Pro staffs
Your right cov.2 is not great against 12 personnel and is not great against inside run. However if you ask any college coach that runs cov.2 what the strength of the run support is they will tell you its outside run. Thats what I have been told by the coaches I have visted with.
You have to understand we incorperate 8 man fronts into our system as well but we do rely on cov.2 alot and have never had problems against the run in it for a few reasons.
A. we stem the front. To quote Dave Aranda as I do alot because he is a great defensive mind..."when you have 7 in the front, stem the front." We stem the front alot in cov.2 out of our 3-4 to give apposing teams blocking schemes trouble.
With the situation you gave outside zone in 12 personnel looking at it on paper it may seem like a problem but here is how we defend it and this is how I was taught it from Bill Williams a former H.S. College and Pro football coach.
Ur OLB head up over the TE in 2 Against reach shoots locks out and skates down the LOS in what we call 100 (head Up) Now you have given the back a visual problem there is a body in that lane. He can either cut outside to our corner force not a good idea or cut inside where we should have our ILB fitting inside out along with the rest of our pursuit.
Your right we dont incorperate our half safeties in any primary run support role in 2 (you must take me for an idiot its ok you dont know me) he is a secondary run support player tho after he checks #1 to make sure he isnt running Vert he will overlap with the corner force insuring the ball does not bounce.
Like I said we have had great success with this defense and our results dont lie, much like ur defenses results. But it is obviously something we dont call on short yardage downs or obvious run downs. We also mix in cov.3 and zone pressures out of the same pre snap look so its hard for offenses to check at the line against us.
In response to your comment about our Corner being blocked by the wide out I doubt it. We angle our Corners on a 45 at EMOL and all he is waiting for is show run outside the triangle thats what they live for. We have never seen our corners get blocked by a wide out in 2. Its a game of angles and wide receivers just dont have the angle to do it. I have cut ups of our guys college and pro corners doing this and making it in time to stone outside run before it starts if you dont believe me.
If the wide out takes an extra large split then we play inside shade on them its that simple. For example if the ball is in the middle of the field and they split the #1 any wider then the top of the numbers then we play inside shade because he has no where else to go outside. Splitting the WRs out isnt the problem its when they bring them in tight that creates problems at times.
I would never play cov.4 for many reasons and ill tell you why...
Depending on who you talk to its still a 7 man front (because your safeties are off at 8-10) ofcourse the big time cov.4 guys wont say that.
The only differance between cov.2 and 4's outside run support in my opinion is the angle the force is coming from. Cov.4 is down hill and cov.2 is coming from outside in.
However most teams will push crack ur safety forcing your corner to crack exchange and you still end up with an outside in corner force the only differance is my cov.2 corner was flying on the snap the cov.4 corner had to wait for the exchange.
And not to mention if you dont have incredible cover guys at corner how faulty the coverage can be. Shaun Watson says he has more cov.4 beaters in his package then any other coverage and I believe it.
If teams sit down your safety they have 1 on 1 match ups to the #1 and we sure dont have the athletes to cov. 1 on 1 consistantly (you obviously do because ur package is predicated on man cover) This leads me to my next Aranda quote "all Cov.4 is after 8 yards is 0 blitz with a 4 man pass rush"
Im not going to give up all that against the pass just to have a safety force down hill.
I know we come from two different schools of thought but just because you dont agree with what im saying, please dont imply that I dont know what im talking about I have spent countless hours researching the schemes that we employ much like im sure you did when you were a young coach like me. Im not a hobby shop guy drawing plays in the mud I go to people who know to learn football and then replicate it with the teams I coach at the H.S. level.
Coach - I don't need to "ask a college coach". I coached 5 years in college football & 1 year in the pros. When you tell me "Cover 2" "gives good run support", I'm sorry but I DO question your basic grasp of the game! About the ONLY reason I would want to be in Cover 2 is the HOLD UP on the WR (which you can also get in other ways)!
Following is from the Pittsburg Steelers. They are Super Bowl Champions - so they must know what they are doing. One of my former players (All-Pro James Farrior) plays for them. One of my best friends (Larry Zierlein) coaches with them.
COUNTING DEFENDERS IN THE “BOX” TO DETERMINE STRENGTH OR WEAKNESS (sample):
A) 2 TE/2 WR/1 RB ALIGNMENT:
1. ONE SAFETY DEEP = 8 IN THE “BOX”. (GENERALITY = PASS).
2. TWO SAFETIES DEEP = 7 IN THE “BOX”. (GENERALITY = RUN).
B) 1 TE/3 WR/1 RB ALIGNMENT:
1. ONE SAFETY DEEP = 7 IN THE “BOX”. (GENERALITY = PASS).
2. TWO SAFETIES DEEP = 6 IN THE “BOX” . (GENERALITY = RUN).
IMPORTANT NOTE: URBAN MEYER uses this same thinking with his NCAA National Champion "Florida Gators". YOU CAN FIND THIS (DIAGRAMS & ALL) IF YOU "GOOGLE" SEARCH for: GATOR COUNTRY SMART FOOTBALL: URBAN MEYER OFFENSE (published Jan. 28, 2009). This should settle the issue, BUT, you will probably take exception to Urban Meyer's thinking!
PS: Do NOT have further time for DEBATE! If you wish to continue this discussion - PHONE 804-378-0116 (between 6 PM & 10 PM/EDT)!