Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I run a 4-4/4-2 G defense. Have always had my mlb's in 20's. They do not flip for strength. They could look in front of them to tell what gap they had. (If they didnt know) I always thought this was much simpler for them. Every offseason I look into having a 10 and 91 players. (I think this is the gaps, off of the top of my head) But I never talk myself into it.
If you shade your DT's (as I'm guessing you do) the offense knows who has which gap "normally" anyhow--so you're not disguising anything by alignment. I am a proponent of keeping those ILB's head up on the G's, but flipping them with strength when you are facing a single TE alignment. Here's why...simply put keeping those ILB's in a head-up technique cuts down the ability of a G to seal them easily. If you have kids who don't ever have a problem with getting locked up with a G, then it is a non issue, and either way is fine. However, I always liked flipping my ILB's because getting to the edge on the TE side is much different than getting to the edge with no TE. It is much tougher, and you have to have your best ILB dealing with that. Plus if you are reading the guards, the read is more comfortable. The only time I kept my ILB's in place was vs teams who were notorious for a quick snap; outside of that I found the guy who was my quickest with his keys, who could shed/beat blockers, and I put him to the TE side as a rule. That was my approach, but if I had two guys who could do it well, I wouldn't eliminate the possibility of just making constant stacks for familiarity between teammates.
Ryan Kelly
Offensive Coordinator
Austin High School
Austin, MN
There is nothing that will show a man's true character like the 2 yard line.
We flip and slide ours. To the 7/3 tech side he is protected so he can be more of a "runner/scraper". To the 5/1 tech side we need more of a plugger our (10-tech LB).
We flip the scraper (40i) to the passing strength so that he is the LB who adjusts to #3 in trips formations. Doing that DOES mean that the 40i may end-up on the 5/1 tech side. When that happens, the LB's are standing over the "bubbles" (open gaps).
Formations that require that (Twins w/TE backside or 2 x 2 w/TE backside) have other issues that make these bubble alignments desirable.
BUT...looking at it from purely a Pro-I standpoint, our even front has favorable numbers to the offense's weak side. We use the FS as the robber to counter the "strong side deficit" but this is also why we feel like it is okay to slide the LB's strong.
Being in a 40i allows that strong side LB to scrape outside or fill back to the A-gap easily. Being in a 10 (essentially stacked on our 1-tech) allows the 10-tech LB to plug EITHER the strong side A gap or weak side B-gap easily. Note: we actually want our 10-tech plugger to be the guy who mashes the FB if they Iso EITHER of those bubbles.
To add to Ringo's post. We want our front 6 to spill everything offering NO cutbacks.
All 4 linemen and both backers (when plugging) keeping inside leverage.
Line is set by the 7 tech with a "right""left" call.
Inside backers are set by the receiver strength with a "Ralph" or "Louie" call made by the FS.
DB's and OLB's are set to the Wide side/ short side. MOF they listen to the FS call.
I LOVE the 40i and 10 alignemnts by the backers. It really allows me to put a big kid at the 10 and a much smaller/faster kid at the 40i.
I used to have the 10 to the 3 tech side and the 30 to the 1 tech side and ALWAYS had problems getting him to scrape to D. He was always caught in shit because he was too damned far into the center and 2 he was the bigger kid. My smaller kid was the 30 backer.
Since I switched the two, its night and day. All the 10 backer really has to do is plug 2 gaps watching G to FB flow. All the 40i backer has to do is read G to FB. He has a great angle to scrape, he has even a better view of the guard to FB.
THEY DO have to get used to listening for the FS rather than setting with the line but once they get it, everything is good.
Jeff is SPOT ON with the way we think! I never understood why everyone wants their LB's shifted weak - just so they are standing in the bubbles...doing so shifts you even more away from where you need the help in a "balanced" defense...the strong side.
And for those of you who are afraid of spilling plays because you think your talent/speed is less than your opponent...don't be! Man-for-man that may be true but if you preech pursuit (proper fits/angles, etc.) you will not have a problem. I love the way we play defense BECAUSE over the years we have usually been less talented but can almost always compete.
Jeff,
I'd love to hear more about your approach to the 42/44 G...sounds like we have similar thoughts about defense.
I want everone spilling to the two OLB's and the FS.
Cutbacks is what always killed me. Shut down the gaps and make everyone bounce outside. Cutbacks gash gap control teams IMHO.
It sucked when a DE kept his oustide leverage, forced it back into what we called "the indians" only to then scamper 50 yards because the FS was down the alley and the strong ILB who was in a 10 got walled off.
My OLB was outside, unblocked waiting, my FS was working to play the hit, unblocked too.
anyway, we are a bending defense who wrong arm everything from DE-DE spilling everything outside.
Weakside trap. You are trapping the 5 tech right? or the 1 tech?
I will assume you are trapping the 5 tech not the 1 because 1 is a very hard trap just be alignment. 5 can be easy to trap when you have a DE that flys up the field every play.
Tackle blocks down, 5 tech. bends down the heels to wrong arm the trap, spills it to the OLB that is unblocked AND the FS coming hard inside out. MIke is workign his natural X the the DE. DE bends down the heels, MIke scrapes to C. Tackle reaches the 5 tech, Mike fills just like their option fill keys.
Mike has to BLAST the Tackle but its nothing different than if he was in a 30.
Teach the D-linemen the keys and they will destroy traps all day. If they get upfield you are in for a long day, just as anyone would be.
Its real easy and it works with EVERY offense. MABY not Zone Read teams but thats apples and oranges.
What we do in Zone Read teams with the 5 tech is one of two things. First thing is we cross key. If the back is to you, play the QB, back away, play the back. Early in the game and the back is to you, I tell my 5 tech to absolutly destroy the QB. I could care less what happened to the ball. I want my kid in pretty boy's grill. I tell my kids to take away the read. No more read he will just give the ball, end of option.
NOW..... If they have a MAN at QB and he keeps getting up and keeps his composure or a back that can really wine it back to the 5 tech, I tell my 5 tech to stop at the LOS when the tackle blocks down. JUST STOP. No more read, no more cutback. The QB won't have any idea what to do and hopefully he gets laid out from behind.
We actually have more trouble when our 3 tech is trapped than our 5. If the 5 tech bends down the LOS and blows up the puller we think it makes the 10 tech LB's job of scraping over the OT down block easier. Plus, if it gets spilled outside like it should there is no one to block the OLB over there. You could influence trap our 1 tech pretty easily but you really don't have anyone left to block the ILB's then.
1. OT does NOT block back on you.
2. Guard pulls, look right to the FB
If the OT tries to block back, you know to stay on the heels of the pulling guard. OT blocks back the 5 tech should be on his heels anyway and the MIKE goes to C.
There is a reason why not may big time colleges and certainly not the pros make a living off of traps and pullig a ton of people. Too easy to read and spill. IMHO.
If you have a disciplined defense, you should never get trapped bottom line.
If you have an undisciplined team you will get your lights trapped out. IMHO.