Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
how many of you guys don't run one defense but run many multiple looks?
i have been a 4-4 guy for a long time but because of lack of talent and skill i jumped into different defenses and it was somewhat successful. Just wanted to know who does this all the time.
In OUR 4-2-5 - we can play a NUMBER of other multiple looks (4-3; 5-3; 6-2; Bear look; Eagle/Shade; etc.). We can do this by teaching the following TECHNIQUES:
DT's: 3 technique; 1 (AKA 2I) tech; Shade technique (played just like the 3 but on the weakside of the Center).
ILBers = 30 technique; 10 Tech.; 00 Tech.
SECONDARY: Cover 1; Cover 1 F/S Robber; Cover 0
The SECRET is not teaching ANYONE over 2-3 techniques!
Any QUESTIONS - feel free to PHONE me at 804-378-0116 (from 10 AM to 9 PM/Eastern).
I am a believer that you need to have a "base". Something you need to teach first, and something your kids are comfortable in. That being said, you need to be able to move your front around. You can't just stay in a 44/42 with a 3 to the strong and a 1 to the weak and have at it for the whole game. Unless your athletes are that much better, the offense will figure it out. Like Coach eludes to above, though...any scheme can be tweaked to give different looks. The trick is to not have a whole-sale change in personnel and philosophy whenever you are changing "looks". I don't think you have to be married to one system, as you say, but you should have something you lean on moreso than the others.
Ryan Kelly
Offensive Coordinator
Austin High School
Austin, MN
There is nothing that will show a man's true character like the 2 yard line.
i do exactly what coach mountjoy described above. At my previous school we could stay in our base and change the front very few times because of our talent. Well at my new school i would play base 4-4 (31 front) against one opponent 60% of the time then next week i have to slide to a 5-3 or 6-2 look. The 4-4 is my base that we learn first and i run a lot of looks out of it but i was debating should i have wholesale personnel changes when i am jumping from front to front.
I am definitely multiple. Same thing, as my first school we were so overloaded with talent that I really didnt need to get creative. We could sit in our 50 shade and stop anyone. At my new place, we need to be different depending on what we are trying to take away.
I think as long as you don't fundamentally change the core facets of your scheme (i.e. going from contain to spill, wrong arming to inside arming, etc) you can be as multiple as you need to be. Everyone has a gap, everyone plays it.
Coach D
Philly suburb HS
"The only players I have hurt with my words are ones who have an inflated opinion on their ability" - Bill Parcells
thanks coach D thats exactly what i was thinking.....by the way i was at the Roman game.....good game.....that was a tough one to lose.....congrats on your season overall....you guys are turning it around
Coach Mountjoy i use the "up" call frequently when i play my 6-2.....there also have been times i wantd to be bigger at the 9-techs so i would also sub out the s/s types for bigger end types
The more important question is what are you trying to force by giving different looks? Its not really a question of just moving kids around. You have to have a purpose in doing so. More to the point is that your players have to understand their roles and the reason.
I'll use Dick Lebeau's 3-4 as a good example. How many times do you see Troy P walk up? LOTS. Reason, to force the offense to change or redirect. Whether he blitzes or drops into coverage is not important. What is important is that the offense has to adjust to account for him being in the box. Lebeau is a master of a moving defense. Jim Johnson at Philly was a master of disguise.
Personally, I use a base and adjust within. I can show a 40 front, 50, or a 60 front and still be in the same defense. Its how you move after then snap that makes it.
Its not about how much YOU know about the game, its about how much you share that knowledge with the people around you.
I guess you are referring to NUMBERING DEFENSIVE TECHNIQUES. Everybody's terminology is different, & it really doesn't matter what you call anything as long as the kids understand.
This was Bear Bryant's:
What are you referring to when you talk about a defensive end in a "6" or a "9" technique? It is football jargon that describes the place where a defensive lineman lines up, and, usually, the technique he employs.
This particular numbering system, which describes a man as a "2" or a "4" and so forth, is widely used among football coaches, and it was first described by the great Paul "Bear" Bryant in his 1960 book "Building a Championship Football Team," a subject he was well-qualified to write on.
I found Coach Bryant's description of the system and why he employed it to be especially interesting.
"After coaching for a number of years," Coach Bryant wrote, "and always trying to find something that would make football easier to understand for the average player, I came upon a system of defensive numbering that has proven very valuable to me since then. In the past I have used many defenses. I always employed the technique of giving each defense a name. Most of the time the name had little in common with the defense, and this confused, rather than helped, the players. After discussing the possibility of the numbering system with my own and other college and high school coaches, while at Texas A & M in 1956 I finally came across a feasible plan for numbering defensive alignments. I must give credit to O. A. "Bum" Phillips, a Texas high school coach (the same Bum Phillips who would later coach the Houston Oilers and New Orleans Saints- HW), for helping work out the solution as he experimented with the numbering system with his high school football team.
"In the numbering of our defense now, we give each offensive man a number, as well as the gaps between offensive linemen."
Whether it was invented by Coach Bryant or Coach Phillips, and whatever its failings, it is the by far the best and most widely-accepted method devised for communicating to another football man, in as few words as possible, precisely what you mean. It's useful on both sides of the ball, enabling a defensive coach to align his personnel, or an offensive coach to describe how opposing defenses are lining up.
In the particular case you describe, a defensive end in a "6" technique is head-up on our TE; in a "9" technique he is on the TE's outside shoulder, or perhaps out in the gap between the TE and our wingback).
Expanding on the subject of the Bear Bryant-Bum Phillips numbering system): As Coach Bryant wrote, "Our present method is the simplest one I know for getting players into various defenses quickly with a minimum ampunt of talking. We feel it eliminates much confusion. We have found that players take a great deal of pride in learning only a few techniques, which they are able to execute well. We know it makes our jobs easier as coaches, and we can do a better job of coaching the boys."
For example, Coach Bryant wrote, whenever a coach talked to a tackle, he would be able to talk in terms of a particular technique (4, or 5, say), and the player would understand him immediately. When the coaches were discussing plays, or in a staff meeting, they could identify a particular technique immediately, and everyone would understand each other. Coach Bryant also discovered that the method was useful in making out his practice schedule, because he had only to specify, "End coach work on 7 technique," and his wishes would be immediately understood.
Using the system, tackles and ends could be taught individual techniques which, when used in combination with each other, would enable them to be deployed in a variety of defensive fronts. This was done by calling a two-digit number: the first digit described the tackles' alignment (and technique), and the second digit aligned the ends. The linebackers would make the calls, and align themselves accordingly.
Two examples are "59" (an odd front, with the nose man not shown), and "27" (an even front).
(Continuing with the Bear Bryant-Bum Phillips numbering system): The system was invented during the time when limited substitution meant that players went both ways, and coaches could not routinely shuttle players in and out with instructions. It enabled Coach Bryant's linebackers to call defenses on each side independent of one another ("3-7, 1-7", for example), in effect giving him a multiple system. "To eliminate any confusion," he wrote, "merely designate which side is to call first, and the other linebacker can adjust his call so (in the case of an even front) there is not a large gap in the middle of the defensive line." Basic rules for the linebackers were that they must have a man in, or capable of covering, every gap, and, to keep from having to cover too much territory themselves, they were never to call two successive numbers (2-3, or 6-7). Needless to say, Coach Bryant's linebackers were like quarterbacks on the field (quarterbacks also called their own plays back then) and had to know the strengths and weaknesses of every defense against every possible offensive set, as well as how to make changes in a hurry. After the players were lined up, if a linebacker wanted a man to change his charge half a man to the inside, he would add a zero to his number: calling out , say, "20" would instruct the man in a "2" technique to charge one-half man to his inside; adding a "1" to the man's number ("21") would instruct the man in a "2" technique to charge one-half man to his outside. By calling out the number of both men on his side ("21-71", for example), he would be able to change the charge of both of them.
TECHNIQUES:
0- The defender lines up head on the offensive center. Depending on the situation, the distance he lines up off the football will vary. On a short yardage situation, he will line up close to the center's head. On a long yardage situation, normally he will be about one yard off the ball. He will use either a three- or four-point stance, with one foot staggered. His technique is to play the center's head with a quick hand shiver on the snap of the ball. When he makes contact with the center, he brings his back foot up so his feet are even with each other. If the quarterback goes straight back to pass, the 0 technique man is responsible for a draw play, and then he rushes the passer. If it is a run instead of a pass play, he will keep the center away from his blocking surface, not permitting himself to be tied up in the middle of the line, and he will pursue the ball taking his proper angle depending on the type of running play.
1- The main job of the player(s) employing the 1 technique is to control the offensive splits, forcing the guards to keep their splits to a minimum. He is also responsible for keeping the center off of the defensive linebacker. If both guards are playing in this technique, only one will "slam" the center, and the other will take a long step toward his guard, playing him from inside-out. He must always be aware of the trap coming from the inside, however. If the play is a back-up pass, he is responsible for the draw first, and rushing the passer second. If it is a running play, he will slam the center or guard and then pursue the football.
2. The 2 technique is similar to the 0 technique. One difference is the guard (note: you might now call him a tackle) is head on the offensive guard, instead of on the offensive center. The distance he lines up off the ball in a staggered stance will be determined by the tactical situation. On the snap of the ball he plays the guard with a hand shiver, and immediately locates the football. If it is a back-up pass and there is no man in a 0 or 1 technique, he will look for the draw play first, and then rush the passer. If it is a running play, he will look first toward the inside for a trap, and then pursue the football.
3. The 3 technique is similar to the 1 technique. The 3 man is responsible for keeping the offensive tackle's split cut down, and on occasion to keep the offensive guard or tackle from blocking the defensive linebacker. He, too, lines up with the feet slightly staggered, and about one foot off the ball. Depending on the defense, when the ball is snapped he will play either the guard or tackle with a quick flipper or shiver, preferably with the hands. He is to watch for the trap at all times. If the play is a straight drop back pass, he will rush the passer from the inside. If it is a running play, he will pursue the football
To be continued...
4. The 4 technique man lines up head on the offensive tackle and abut one to one and one-half feet off the ball. He will have his feet staggered, and on the snap of the ball he is to play the offensive tackle with a quick hand or forearm flipper. If it is a running play toward him, he must whip the offensive tackle, be ready to stop the handoff, and help out on the off-tackle play. If it is a straight back pass, he will rush the passer from the inside. If the play goes away or to the far side, he will control the offensive tackle and pursue the football. On his angle of pursuit he should never go around the offensive tackle, but pursue the football going through the tackle's head.
5. The 5 technique man lines up on the outside eye of the offensive tackle, with the feet staggered (outside foot back in most cases). On the snap of the ball he employs a forearm flip charge into the tackle. As he makes contact, his back foot is brought up even with his front foot. He has 75% off-tackle responsibillity, and he should never be blocked by only one man. If it is a straight back pass, he should rush the passer from inside-out. If the play comes toward him, he should whip the tackle and make the play. He must be certain to keep the offensive blocker in front of him at all times as the 5 man will be eliminated from the play very easily if he tries to go around his blocker. If the play goes away from him, he must pursue the football. He is instructed not to cross the offensive line of scrimmage when employing a 5 technique.
6. The 6 technique player lines up head on the offensive end. If the end splits too far, the 6 man is to "shoot the gap." He is primarily responsible for keeping the offensive end from releasing quickly on passes, and he must keep the end from blocking the linebacker. He is responsible for the off-tackle play. Consequently he must not be blocked in our out. The game situation will determine how far he lines up off the ball, but it will usually vary from one to three yards. If the play is a straight back pass, he is responsible for rushing the passer fom the outside-in. If the passer runs out of the pocket, the 6 man must not permit him to get to the outside. He must either tackle the passer or force him to throw the football. If the play comes toward the 6 man, he whips the end with a flip or shiver charge, and helps out on both inside and outside. He never crosses the line of scrimmage unless it is a back-up pass. If it is an option play toward him, he must make the quarterback pitch the ball or he must tackle the quarterback. If the flow goes away from him, he trails the play. He should be as deep as the deepest man in the offensive backfield so he can contain the reverse play back to his side, not permitting the ball carrier to get outside of him.
7. The 7 tehnique player line up splitting the inside foot of the offensive end. He is responsible for forcing the end to reduce his offensive split. We want him to line up with the outside foot staggered, and he must never be blocked out by the offensive end. He has 75% inside responsibility and 25% outside responsibility. When the ball is snapped, he uses a hand or forearm flipper charge on the offensive end and brings his back foot up even with his front foot. His main responsibility is to whip the offensive end, and to close the off-tackle play. If the play is a straight drop back pass, he is the outside rusher and he must not permit the quarterback to get outside of him. If the play goes away from him, he is to trail the ball carrier. He plays just like the trail or chase man on the 6 technique. He should be as deep as the deepest offensive backfield man so he can contain any reverse play coming back to his side of the line. He should not let such a play get outside of his position.
8. When we speak of a man playing an 8 technique, we are speaking of a "true end," or a defensive end who lines up outside of the offensive end. The 8 man will be from one and one-half to three yards outside of the offensive end's normal position, with his inside foot forward, and his shoulders parallel with the line of scrimmage. If it is a straight back pass, the defensive end, without taking his eyes off the passer, will turn to his outside, and using a cross-over step will sprint to his outside trying to get width and depth to play the ball to his side. His depth should be 8-10 yards deep, similar to a linebacker's position covering the flat. He stops running when the quarterback stops to set up. When the ball is thrown, he sprints for the ball. If the play comes toward the 8 man, we want him to cross the line of scrimmage about two yards, getting set with his inside foot forward, shoulders parallel with the line of scrimmage, and playing the outside blocker. He is the outside contain man, and he must never permit the ball to get outside of him. He never makes the quarterback pitch on option plays. If it is a running pass toward him, he is the outside contain and rush man. If the flow goes away from him, he must make sure it is not a reverse play back to his side before he takes the proper angle of pursuit, which is through the area where the defensive safety man lined up originally.
9. The 9 technique splits the outside foot of the offensive end. He should line up 14 inches off the line of scrimmage, with most of the weight on his outside foot, which is back. When the ball is snapped, the 9 technique man will take a short step with his inside foot toward the offensive end, and at the same time he will deliver a hand or forearm shiver to the head of the offensive end. If the offensive end blocks in and the play comes toward him, the 9 man immediately looks for the near halfback or the trapper, expecting to be blocked by either offensive man. If a running play comes toward him and the quarterback is going to option the football, he must make the quarterback pitch the ball. If the quarterback is faking the ball to the fullback, the 9 man must "search" the fullback for the ball first. The 9 technique man never crosses the line of scrimmage. If the offensive play is a straight back pass, the 9 man delivers a blow to the end, and drops back two or three yards looking for the screen or short pass. He is in a position to come up and make the tackle if the quarterback gets outside of your outside rusher and the quarterback decides to run with the football. If the flow goes away, he is the trail man and has the same responsibilities as the 6 and 7 technique man, which I explained previously. The most important coaching point is that the man playing the 9 technique must deliver a good blow to the offensive end on every play.
Anyone know why the 8 tech is wider than the 9? Never really understood that part of the numbering system. We just number 0 on the center, 123 on guard, 456 on tackle, 789 on End, I guess we never actually use what the scheme refers to as an 8 tech in our defense. What if he gets play action at him, I would think he'd have to be pretty darn good to step up on a run read and still get from the LOS to 8-10 yds deep in the flat before the ball is thrown. Are you really counting on his coverage there, or is he an extra player there? Also I bet old school sprint draw would be a killer for him.
I've always used the same numbering system. I know some like to put the 0 tech on the nose, and the 1 tech's on the A-gap shade of the C...then comes the 2i, 2, etc. Whatever language system works for your defense, that you can teach to your kids...use it! keep things as simple as you can.
Ryan Kelly
Offensive Coordinator
Austin High School
Austin, MN
There is nothing that will show a man's true character like the 2 yard line.
Doesn't the post above say the 8 tech is 1/2 to 3 yds wider than the TE where a 9 is outside shoulder, or am I misunderstanding the terminology. We don't do it that way, just curious as to the theory behind it. Does anyone play with a guy in an 8 tech as described above? seems almost like a bandit/spur from the 3-5 defense.
Yes - my previous post explains that the 8 aligns wider than the 9 BECAUSE 9 (being an odd number) is shaded on outside shoulder. All EVEN numbers are head up.
That is the only way to remain CONSISTENT. PHONE me at 804-378-0116 (Va) if this isn't clear!
That is awesome stuff. We use a numbering system too but we have a 6 on inside shoulder and a 7 on the outside. If we see an unbalanced line then we add an 8 or a 9. My problem is when we add a backer it screws up our blitzes and terminology. We are a 4-3 and we usually just have him take the place of the free safety. We are obviously hoping it's a double tight formation we will see and that we can put that extra backer in the extra gap created by the offensive formation. We call him the Don, because normally if we put in an extra backer we are going to put him down on the line. We'll keep our starting 3 backers up then. If I call Saw, the Sal and Will are blitzing. We don't have blitzing verbage for that extra backer, and against a 1 tightend formation we would use secondary verbage to tell him what to do. It's easier for us to put in another lineman or db but the backer is where their is confusion.
Ethan adding an extra backer will change the calls for sure. If that is your conundrum then you have to switch to either a Gap or Technique call system. A very simple example would be a 4-3 or 5-3 going Saw who switches to a 4-4 or 5-4 would then use Double D (Both Outside Backers), or B,D (Inside and Outside), or 50-30 (Outside, Inside), 30-30 (Both Inside).
Its not about how much YOU know about the game, its about how much you share that knowledge with the people around you.
I run different "Looks" not schemes. As far as I am concerned its way too complicated to flip back and forth between schemes. That being said there are many similarities between the various defenses that cross over. The main thing you have to consider is staying in the same mold. By that I mean if you run and even front base, you can go from a 40 to a 60 front with relative ease and little confusion. Same goes for a 30 and a 50 front. I dont jump around in coverages either, if I am using man then that's what I use. If its a zone package then I stay that way. The concept, at least for me, is to create hesitation or confusion for the offense, not for my defense. So based on my 40 front, I can go 4-4, 4-3, 4-5, 6-3, or 6-2 depending on what I want to show them and the coverages involved. Personally, I am not a huge blitzer, but I will blitz from different angles based on the situation. So that's 5 different looks within the same general scheme, I can put up against an offense.
To my mind its more about what happens after the ball is snapped then it is about what I show them at the LOS. I guess what I am trying to say is dont over think it. Your base has got to be real solid, otherwise, anything you try to do with different looks will just blow up in yer face.
Its not about how much YOU know about the game, its about how much you share that knowledge with the people around you.