Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by Coach Campbell on Feb 16, 2015 5:21:18 GMT
Reading wax in Mickeys ears will keep you in best option beside being able to understand how many defenders are located in side the box and reading coverage.
The "Option on Me" concept is a great way to level the playing field against teams that scheme to take away offenses best run/pass plays. The ability of the QB to identify the "Wax in Mickey" ears helps set the play for the QB. The inverted safety and or outside LB's can help the QB identify numbers in the box and select the most advantages play for the offense. This philosophy is great because it is a 1. a systematic approach for the QB and or offense, 2. takes what the defense gives to the offense, and 3. can force the defense to show their intentions pre-snap. Additionally, this type of play can eliminate the defensive coaching staff, force poor or reactionary in-game adjustments which can create larger problems and most importantly, allows the offense to stay in within the scheme they practiced all season. This concept reminds me of a book I read years ago called "Snap Decisions" Unleashing the power of Audibles. It is a small book about Coach Hollenbeck who installed the Split back Veer and adjusted it to a audible system which allowed the QB and coach to make calls at the LOS. It worked....Coach Hollenbeck finished with a 76-15 career.
The negative side to this style of offense is the ability of the defense to load the box and take away the ability to run the ball. Teams that know the QB is reading inverted safeties can manipulate pre-snap alignments and or disguise secondary movements. Additionally, teams can present particular fronts prior to the QB call and then adjust late in the cadence. Also, some defensive coordinators "BUZZ" movement upfront and create chaos for QB's attempting to make calls. I realize that a good offensive coordinator or coach will simply try and quick count or "kill" call this style of defensive play, but that is exactly what the defense is looking for, to nullify the offense system and prevent the offense from getting into the "perfect" play. Another issue that comes into play with this style offense at the high school level is reps in practice. If the starting quarterback is injured, the second string QB which likely had fewer reps in practice and may be a bit young must now lead the offense and make the calls at the LOS. In my experience, that can be overwhelming for a young QB. These would be some of my negative thoughts regarding the system.
Option on Me is a system that is designed to allow the QB play calling options based off the defense. It requires the QB to read the defense presnap and choose one of three option plays:
1. Midline
2. Inside Veer
3. Load
The QB needs to read/determine the end man on the line of scrimmage and the outside inverts to determine which play will be best to run to gain numbers advantage and have greatest success again that specific defense.
There are some very positive advantages of allowing your QB to to determine the option to run. The QB is the leader of the offense and should understand it inside and out and the best view/picture of defense upon the snap. He should have the best advantge and view point to determine which option play is the best call based off the defense.
I also believe that is builds great leadership and confidence in your quarterback as a player and leader. Placing the ability to call the play in him also places faith from the coaching staff and teammates in the the QB and his abilities. I believe this encourages him to become a better leader and more importantly a better teammate.
The one major con is ever QB is different, there are some who have all the skills and abilities of a true QB but lack the ability to identify correct calls so it makes it difficult for breakdown the defense and determine which is the best option. However with correct guidance and coaching, I believe each QB can be taught and coaches through the process of determining which option to call.
Post by Coach Campbell on Mar 29, 2020 15:15:23 GMT
Greg Marshall
“Option On Me” is an offensive philosophy that gives the quarterback the option to call the best of 3 option plays on the line of scrimmage. “Option On Me” can be used with any offensive tempo; hurry up, on the ball and or out of the huddle. The primary factor that determines which option play to be run is the quarterback's identification and location of the inverted or force defender. The inverted defender may be on the Open Side, Tight End Side or there could be double inverted defenders. The inverted defender is the key to the option play to be called, hence the quarterback has a read progression from the Open Side to the Tight End Side which is alos considered the “Closed Side.” It is important to note that the offensive formation(One tight End and Two Backs or 21 personnel) enables the inverted safety to be a reliable read for the best option.
Once the Side is the determined Open or Closed the quarterback will take his eyes to the first down lineman past the center which will activate the quarterbacks decision to one of 3 plays; Veer versus a Open 1 tech alignment, Midline versus a Closed 3 tech alignment, Load Option versus a Open 4i tech alignment and Load Option versus a Closed 5 & 9 tech alignment.
Giving the quarterback the ability to call the best play at the line of scrimmage definitely has its benefits especially if the offense can not just enforce its will upon their opponent, do to a size advantage, skill set or when facing a tilted defensive scheme.
Best Options pros and cons:
Pro: Gives the offense the ability to adjust the play once the defense is declared.
Con: The quarterback determines the play on alignment but doesn’t address the potential blitz.
Pro: On the L.O.S cal are good versus defensive with multiple fronts
Con:The defense can anticipate the offensive play based on the defense called
Pro; The option can be run to the weakness of the defensive structure
Con: The weakness of the defense could be the defenses individual strength or cluster of strong player
Post by Coach Campbell on Dec 28, 2020 1:46:38 GMT
Nicholas
This is a tough and truly fair question to ask. How much freedom and reigns does a coach give their QB on the field to change the call or play. I believe you earn the trust and build the relationship to allow that kind of leadership on the field. I also feel that football IQ has to be a factor in allowing a QB to change the play call. A great athlete does not always mean a smart athlete and vice versa. I like the idea of allowing the QB to make a check call on the line of scrimmage because they see things that us coaches may not see on the field. The QB has to be able to justify their play call when they come back to the sideline. Discussing the numbers game helps a QB tremendously to see what they need to do from there. Once they make a change, they need to make sure that all, especially on the line, know the call. If the line does not know, it makes for a long game. As soon as the ball is snapped, the QB needs to make their read, which is typically the outside vert; they will then be able to make the wisest choice and increases the probability of a better outcome. Coming from an RPO offense the past two years, we gave much freedom to the QB to make the simpler choices for the QB. As they progress through the levels, they got more freedom to make check calls.
There are several pros and cons to allowing a QB to make check calls at the line. As stated earlier, the level of play has a factor in how much freedom is allowed. If we have a great Junior QB that can make the reads and follow through with their actions, they deserve and have earned the opportunity to make check calls. In my current program, we have a Sophomore that is more than capable and has confidence in the coaches to make the correct decision. Another factor that comes into play is the level of football IQ. I will not be as willing to allow a QB to make the calls on the line f they are showing trouble in their reads, coverages, and playbook. I have seen both ends of the spectrum for football IQ in QB's. Some are trained and put forth the effort to know the game on both sides and understand what is going on. Others are just gifted athletes who can throw the ball but can not make the reads. Another pro is that it shows the QB that you have faith and trust to make the correct call. This is essential in building leaders and critical thinking skills outside of football. I also like to have athlete leadership on the field. Players respond more to hearing it from their peers than they will from a coach, which is another avenue for my athletes to build that trait. Another pro is that they might see something that coaches do not. This is important because they can now change the call into a better scenario with a higher outcome than what was called from the coaches. Some cons that come to mind would be the fact that we are allowing a young adult to make calls for the entire side of the ball. They may not fully understand what is being asked of them, which may lead to bigger issues down the road. Great coaches know how to disguise their coverages and how to exploit an offense. Putting the pressure on a high schooler is tough and can be very daunting to their confidence. I instill much trust in my lineman to make the correct calls and to speak up when things are not correct. The QB could also lose confidence in the rest of the offense if they make several wrong check calls in a game. Overall, I like the idea of options for the QB to make because it gives them opportunities to make smart and easy decisions that can lead to more down the road.