Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
There are a lot of the archived articles that I would like to refer back to. I had no luck getting them using the search mode. How can I access them? Or are they gone forever?
What is the QB's footwork when running the option on me 113, 110 and 118 play action pass. We have a right handed QB who runs the 110 pretty well, but has difficulty running the 113 and 118.
I was wondering what the pro's and con's were to having receivers start with their inside or outside foot back at alignment. Does anyone have any strong feelings as to why receivers should have their inside foot back or their outside foot back?
Great question. I had always hear that you should put the inside back so that it was easier to look in and see the snap of the ball, yet all of the D1 and pro guys go the other way.
Great question. I had always hear that you should put the inside back so that it was easier to look in and see the snap of the ball, yet all of the D1 and pro guys go the other way.
We have our receivers put thier inside foot forward. This keeps them from turning their shoulders before the snap. We also have found it easier to excape bump coverage from this position. We will step out first and then rip or swim the CB. We try to have all of our receivers make an outside release on every route. Our first 3 steps are outside to show deep route. We want the CB to think he is going on a fade everytime. We want the CB to trun his shoulders even if it is just a slight turn. No matter the rorute, we have the inside foot forward and the hands close to the chest in a boxers' position. Easier to signal route conversions and it just gets the receivers ready to play. We got this from Florida State years ago.
Another key point is balance. It is difficult for the WR to look inside and not lose his balance on the start if his outside leg is up. With inside leg up, he is looking to the same side of the leg that is up and can avoid the false step on the start. Our receivers are taught to put about 75% of wt. on front foot (ball of foot) and explode off of it (should be able to balance w/ rear foot off of ground). Hands are relaxed at waist level ready to take on hands of CB jam, body bent at hips to limit target for CB. We teach that it is essential that they continue to gain positive ground and work upfield (foot fire). If they lose balance and have a poor get-off, timing is disrupted and the route is probably shot. It also could be a matter of which leg is needed to plant off of on the break for the route. 3 steps would put the outside leg as the plant foot for the break in many quick rts (ex. 3 step game: slant, hitch).
I think that there are good arguments for both. In college the timing is much faster than high school obviously. Routes like the three step slant and five step hitch time up well with the outside leg back. In high school, I personally think the timing is better with the inside leg back because your routes take one step longer to develop. This works well with the high school arm strength. Some teams do use the inside leg primarily though: Spurrier-Gators and Redskins, BYU, Texas, and Tennessee are a couple I can think of. If you are going to run some bubble screens, I also think having the inside leg back helps. Would like to hear some other opinions though.