Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Coaches, I know the in Coach Campbell's manuals the original splits of the OL is 2ft across the board. We will be installing the double wing this year and I have talked to a couple of coaches who have given very different advice as to our splits. To give you some background on what we will be running; we will be incorporating the base plays from the Wing-T (FB Trap, HB/WB Trap, QB Keep, and WB Counter Trap), from the Spread Veer (Midline, Inside Veer, Load Opt., Speed Opt., Counter Opt., 10/11 Trap, and 10/11 Trap Option). We will also incorporate a Toss, Isolation, and two or three plays from the Shotgun (maily to prevent the DL from crabbing).
I understand some of the advantages of tight splits (6in to 1ft) are: D cannot shoot gaps as easily, double teams are easier to achieve, and the "D" cannot see as clearly into the backfield. Some of the advantages of 2ft splits are: inside releases are easier, QB reads on the Triple Option are easier, and natural running lanes are created by bigger OL splits.
We have been considering making our splits 1ft - 1.5ft - 3ft to possibly attain the best of both worlds. What do you think? Thanks, Coach Fish
Gohuskers I don't know if I no what your other coaches informed you about in regards to line splits and I may not have the same creibility as they do, but I run a varity of plays with the option game being called at the LOS the two foot splits balances the front and gives the best case senirio for being checked into different plays on the LOS. I have been apart of a number one rushing offense in the nation and a number 1 passing offense in the nation and the balance across the front keeps a happy medium. I teach zone blocking concepts with my offensive line and have found that these accomplish many variables for running plays both run and pass. If your plays are all called in the huddle and you use no audible system then yes line splits will chance according to the type of play being called. Coach CAmpbell
Coach Campbell, I appreciate your input. Have you ever had any difficulty with double teams not being able to reach (get hip-to-hip) with two foot splits? What do you feel are the other advantages of being 2ft across the board versus wider or tighter? I like the stability of 2ft with the option of widening or tightening. I also am an advocate of zone schemes. Thanks, Coach Fish
Post by Coach Campbell on Apr 5, 2002 10:23:27 GMT
Coach Fish your questions are good ones. I no longer coach at the college level but at a 5A high school here in Texas and I teach 4 different distinct zone pushes each with its own footwork, we use a 2 foot split across the front with our linemen adjusting their splits to the combo and type of front. The two foot split is the starting point which you can and will get hip to hip and If you have one of my manuals I call it HIPPO on the combo. Good to have you to the site and I promise you I'll never add to our site things that don't work. You must be able to coach what you feel comfortable with I always have felt if you as a coach have a systematic way of installing your scheme then your players have a systematic way of learning it. Coach CAmpbell
Based on coach Campbell's teaching, I have been using 2' splits also. However, I give my linemen the option to increase their splits if the defense remains constant. The guards can go to 3' on the midline. The tackles can go to 4' on the inside veer. The TE can go to 4' on the midline and inside veer. We have faced teams that have run the same defense throughout the game and when we can take advantage of bigger splits we do. This does not always happen and when the defense varies we stay with the 2' splits.