Post by lochness on Jul 22, 2003 9:27:25 GMT
Coaches,
We have recently gotten the sad news that our senior QB and captain will most likely be ineligible due to academic problems during the 4th quarter. This QB is probably one of the best players to come through the school in a while. The problem is, all of our off-season planning was geared around this QB, and our next-best back up is a Sophomore who has only seen Frosh trigger time (in other words, we were expecting at least another year to get the younger guy ready).
Now we must put our faith in the young QB's hands. Our offense is traditionally a 2-back multiple "West Coast" concept. We run the ball very effectively, and throw the short and medium pass game extreemly well (set school records for passing and receiving last season). My problem is in how to best modify the offense to accomodate for the skills of our QB without taking away from the rest of the team. We are VERY loaded at all of our other positions. Our projected OL has 4 seniors and 1 junior, all athletes, and averaging almost 250lbs per man (which for our area and division is massive). We have 3 senior WR's, 2 of whom are track and field speed burners and excellent athletes. Our starting FB and HB from last year both return as seniors this season, and both are very effective runners. We also return a very gifted HB who missed last season due to injury, but had enough talent to start for us as a Freshman and Sophomore. We run a "TE by committee" system with two 200lb+ seniors and a 6'3 Junior.
I guess my delima is: on the one hand I know we must limit our offense based upon the QB's learning curve and abilities. On the other hand, though, we have a team that is basically capable of executing anythin we can ask of them. How do I continue to maximize my talent while not overburdening a young QB?
Please don't respond saying "coach, you should run the wing-T" or, "coach, the Markham double wing is where it's at"!! I'm really not interested in buying into a new system. I'd like to hear general approaches from people who may have some appropriate insight.
Thank you very much for your feedback!
We have recently gotten the sad news that our senior QB and captain will most likely be ineligible due to academic problems during the 4th quarter. This QB is probably one of the best players to come through the school in a while. The problem is, all of our off-season planning was geared around this QB, and our next-best back up is a Sophomore who has only seen Frosh trigger time (in other words, we were expecting at least another year to get the younger guy ready).
Now we must put our faith in the young QB's hands. Our offense is traditionally a 2-back multiple "West Coast" concept. We run the ball very effectively, and throw the short and medium pass game extreemly well (set school records for passing and receiving last season). My problem is in how to best modify the offense to accomodate for the skills of our QB without taking away from the rest of the team. We are VERY loaded at all of our other positions. Our projected OL has 4 seniors and 1 junior, all athletes, and averaging almost 250lbs per man (which for our area and division is massive). We have 3 senior WR's, 2 of whom are track and field speed burners and excellent athletes. Our starting FB and HB from last year both return as seniors this season, and both are very effective runners. We also return a very gifted HB who missed last season due to injury, but had enough talent to start for us as a Freshman and Sophomore. We run a "TE by committee" system with two 200lb+ seniors and a 6'3 Junior.
I guess my delima is: on the one hand I know we must limit our offense based upon the QB's learning curve and abilities. On the other hand, though, we have a team that is basically capable of executing anythin we can ask of them. How do I continue to maximize my talent while not overburdening a young QB?
Please don't respond saying "coach, you should run the wing-T" or, "coach, the Markham double wing is where it's at"!! I'm really not interested in buying into a new system. I'd like to hear general approaches from people who may have some appropriate insight.
Thank you very much for your feedback!