Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Coaches, I wanted to know your thoughts on stemming from a 4-4 to a 5-3. Do you think stemming right before the snap would throw off the offense or would linning up in one front one play, and then lining up in the next one on the next play would do just as good?
I believe that stemming to a different front when the QB begins his cadence is much more difficult on O-Linemen. The Offense may start going on quick counts, but that is forcing the offense to adjust to your defense.
i agree. even when a team blocks using base rules, they lose track of players, especially linebackers. you see a lot of double teams on dl when they are not really necessary.
with changing fronts, even though it makes ol think, you give them some time to think it through. stemming allows for less time.
i agree. even when a team blocks using base rules, they lose track of players, especially linebackers. you see a lot of double teams on dl when they are not really necessary.
with changing fronts, even though it makes ol think, you give them some time to think it through. stemming allows for less time.
I think stemming defenses is a great way to both confuse an offense and to counter a team that "pairs" their plays or checks with the QB as to which way to run a play at the line of scrimmage. We faced a team that would come out in a 2 back double tight flanker set and would check the lead option to our 7 tech. We adjusted by stemming opposite at the start of the audible of the QB. It worked great because they would audible - we would stem and they would run the play to our 9 tech instead of the 7 tech. They also got a few delay of game penalties because our stems kept changing their plays. It stopped them from audibling at the line of scrimmage. I wouldn't suggest stemming to different defenses with different responsibilites unless your defense can handle those new responsibilities, but stemming into basically the same defense with the same responsibilities can be a strong counter for a defensive coordinator. I also like disguising coverages for the same reasons. Just remember to not overload your players with to much. Keep it simple and let them make plays.
How do you call your stemming fronts in the huddle. I was thinking of having our D-Line and our LB's have a base front and then the defense that is called in the huddle is what they will stem to on first sound by the QB.
How do you guys impliment and call the stemming in your D. Any specific examples? Thanks!
We use a system that is pretty simple. First of all, all of our fronts are words, meaning that in the huddle we will call a front, stunt, and a numbered coverage. When we stem we simply call two front. The first we show, the second we play. We tell our kids to focus on where you are to end up.
Example: Our basic defensive fronts:
Base: 9,3 strong; 1 and a 6 weak Eagle: 9,6,1 strong; 3 and a 6 weak Hawk: 9,6,3 strong; 1 and a 6 weak Huskie: 9,6,1 strong; 1 and a 6 weak
When we call a defense I would call as follows: "Eagle Cover 4", or "Base Cover 2"
When we stem, I might say "Base stem Eagle Cover 4" or "Base stem husky cover 6"
In the PSC-pre snap cadence- is the time to stem most definitely. The post above that states stem only to something similar is right on, in my book. Don't try to get too sophisticated and stem to a bad alignment!
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE