Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I posted earlier about information on the 33/35 and received an offer for tapes, playbooks, etc. and I read the article from the AFCA--Tell me more please!! We are a traditional 52 team that faces everything from the NW gun to double tights-veer and the wing T. What are the advantages over the 52? We are already a very versatile defense, by neccessity, and I am wondering if this is just going to be like re-naming our 52 defense or something new and improved??
Coach, We like the 3-5 because of our kids. We have a lot of lb type kids. I also like it because it is the only defense that puts 6 guys inside the tackle box.. I also like how easy the adjustments are and how it creates a tremendous amount of confusion on the offense do to all of the blitzing you can do out of the 3-5. PGOLLA
Coach, We like the 3-5 because of our kids. We have a lot of lb type kids. I also like it because it is the only defense that puts 6 guys inside the tackle box.. I also like how easy the adjustments are and how it creates a tremendous amount of confusion on the offense do to all of the blitzing you can do out of the 3-5. PGOLLA
We also have a lot of linebacker type kids--we've gone to a 52 with man, cover 2, and cover 3. Our man and cover 2 allows us to keep 9 guys in the box as most of the teams don't throw much. We are one of the smaller teams physically in our conference and our problems have come when the opposing offense lines up toe to toe and wants to play smash mouth power football. We have countered by lots of stunts, changing the QB's reads, and blitzing a lot. I am very interested in finding new ways to apply pressure and maintaining sound coverages etc. Is the 33/35 a radical change from the 52?
Post by defenseisgold on Aug 12, 2003 17:16:30 GMT
It depends on how you ran your 52. For us, the last few years we ran a base 52 and moved the front around with alingment calls and slants. The 33 has been similar in installation for the 3 up front players. For everyone else, it is almost like a new defense. The 33 allows you to play FAST! LBs can attack more because cutback lanes are less a concern than for the two inside LBs in the 52. The LBS still play cutbacks, but it is downhill and on the move. The alignments and stunts are only limited by your imagination and what will help shut down the offense.
The 3-5 seems to be a very sound defense. My main reservation with my team right now is that is seems that you better have some pretty studly Spurs if you want to play man vs twins and be able to be sound in stopping the run to a double tight, power type team. We have to learn 2 positions so I want a couple basic defenses that I can feel comfortable adjusting to any offense with. I know that it can probably be done, I am just not smart enough to trust myself to teach it well. Does anyone have trouble finding 2 athletes that can cover a quality reciever and still stuff the run?
CUI, yes, you do need to have studly spurs. but, you can also drop them to the flats in cover 3. give up a little in the hole, but we don't see that many teams who throw there.
We have had a little trouble finding the studly spurs. So, what we decided to do, is make them into a field and boundary position. We make our studly spur who can play pass and run, go to the field. Then we have a guy who can play run pretty well. And since he's into the boundary, it helps with his coverages. That's just what we do though...
because we see mainly double tight and 2 backs, we like that we can put 6 defenders between the tight ends as opposed to 5 with a 5-2. plus, most teams don't throw much, so often the 1 free db became a non-factor.