Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
We have been trying to figure out a way to run the outside veer from the I formation. I presume the angle is difficult but would like to get some ideas that may help us. I think the play would be near unstoppable if you could figure out how to run it well.
We ran the play from the I formation this year after switching from split backs. It is not the same play as from the split backs because it doesn't hit as fast but is still a very effective play for us, especially near the goalline. Our fb takes a 45 degree cross-over step. (not a full cross over step like belly g)His aiming point with the crossover step is the inside leg of the offensive tackle. Once he gets into the mesh he needs to square up his shoulders (usually his third step) or he will keep running at too flat an angle. Our qb turns and takes three big steps towards the read key extending the ball. By the time he gets to the mesh he has made up his mind to give or pull. There is not a long ride on this play like inside veer. There is very little ride at all. We actually read the play more effectively from the I than the split backs. I think this is because it does hit a little slower.
You're right about the angle, it's not as good from the I as the split backs. Here's what I suggest. The idea behind the outside veer is to put a double bind on the DE. Do I take the dive (which is hitting right in front of me), or do I take my normal option responsibility-QB? Most teams use a double team with the TE and the playside tackle to get the inside seal. But if you remove the TE from the box, not only does the defense have to remove one defender, they reduce the front. Now instead of a 3 and 7 or 9 technique, you have a 3 and 5 technique. You still get a double team at the point of attack (guard and tackle), you still put the defensive end in a double bind, but most importantly, you get an angle for your fullback. Just a thought.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
Option Coach, You are correct about the outside veer to the open side. For 4 years it is the biggest gainer we have by yards per play. We will cut the three tech with the guard and put the tackle straight on LB. This way there is not a way we cannot get to the playside lb. If the three tech is wide we run midline or trap.
Depends on how well coached the team is. I would say my qb pulls against well coached teams more times than not,and we gash teams with the fb that run up the field. Presnap alignment of teh defensive end usually can determine what is going to happen. Wide five it iwll be a give, tight five a pull.
assuming that you are running the play to an open side versus a three and a five tech., other than the fb's path, what is the difference between the outside veer and the inside veer. Also, same question about running the play to the tight side against a 4-3 defense with a three tech and an end on the outside shoulder of the tight end?
For us there is no difference. We run 3 wides so all we have is inside veer and midline. We don't have an outside veer. I will say that inside veer run at a 3 tech is harder than running it toward the shaded nose. Thats why we installed the midline. We don't use a TE, but I would think if you're going to really try to get the 9 technique to bite on the dive back, it's going to have to hit in the C gap. Obviously, it depends on what technique the end is playing. Crash, box, feather. If the FB hits hard right off guard, and the tackle and TE block down, I think what you end with is a FB dive play.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
Option coach, I disagree. The outside veer to us is the aiming point of the fb, not wehter ther is a tight end in the game or not.. If he is aiming a gap plus over(inside foot of the tackle) It is a different read for the defensive end. Even with no tight end. If the defensive end does not come down right now the fb is into the secondary. If he crashes the qb is on the perimeter right now. It hits quicker than the inside veer. The other good thing about it is you don't have to combo the three tech and teach your backs how to bounce outside the double. We can sit here and argue that it isn't outside veer because there is no tightend, but the footwork by the qb and fulback, and the blocking by the line, and the read of the qb is all outside veer, even without the tight end. Seems to me it must be outside veer. I repeat, it has been a great complement to our inside and midline from three wides.
We never even attempted to put this play in. One day four years ago, our qb saw out of our three wides set that the five tech to the two receiver side was wide. He checked to outside veer. I asked him why he did it and he said that with the end playing wider he felt the tackle was unconvered and that was our rule, run outside veer to an uncovered tackle. Our scout team defense couldn't stop it and either have many ouf our opponents.
I posted a question earlier about the aiming point for the dive back asking what others do with this issue. Our feeling is, if the guard is uncovered, the inside veer should hit a little tighter, almost right over the guard. If we get the 3 and 5 technique, we do coach him to aim a little wider...tackle's inside foot, but we still just called it veer. The QB's first step is a little flatter, but he still used a "j" step during his read of the 5 technique. I can see where if the QBs steps are a quick three, the play is more of a true outside veer, but not sure why the read for the D-end is different. What do you do about a 0, 3, and 5, like in a reduced 50 front?
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
We would run inside veer to the 3/5 side - double combo the 3 and read the 5 for dive or keep - most teams will put the DE on the QB. Aiming point remains constant - we use midline of the G on inside veer. FB would bounce after clearing LOS. If the defense did not reduce then we would look at outside veer if the DT was in a 4 or 4i.(Load or Lead Option is good also) The best scenerio is a reduction on the TE or SB side with the DE in a 9 and the tackle in a 3 - Our thought is to have the mesh as far away as possible from the man we are reading. We will flex out TE to about 5 -6 feet from the tackle to widen the DE(expecially 4-4 fronts)