Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Post by offensiveconfusion on Feb 19, 2004 10:15:11 GMT
I want to get yall's opinions. Is it better to run an offense with only one base formation and run several different plays or is it better to have a multiple formation offense with 5 or 6 plays that can be ran (blocked) the same way out of every formation
WE HAVE 6 BASE PLAYS, 5 TRAPS, 3 REVERSES, SPRINT OUT PASS AND PLAY ACTION. WE USE 3 BASE FORMATIONS: PRO I, TWINS I, TWINS SPLIT I. WE USE A DIFFERENT FORMATION FOR TWO-MINUTE. THAT KEEPS US PRETTY BUSY AND I FEEL IT KEEPS OUR OPPONENTS BUSY ENOUGH DURING THE WEEK THAT THEY DON'T GET A LOT OF REPS. PERSONALLY, I FEEL YOU SHOULD PICK A FEW PLAYS AND A FEW FORMATIONS AND WORK THEM HARD. THIS MAY NOT BE THE BEST, BUT IT HAS WORKED FOR US.
We use a spread formation as our base formation. Formation "changes" are accomplished with motion. We will usually motion one of the wingbacks on every play. This player can be moved to tailback, down the line, or into a reciever set to give trips. It also gives us the ability to use the motion from either side so the defense can not declare a strong side, they will usually declare to the field. From this set we run several different plays. The number of plays we run is based on how well we teach and the players learn. In general, we have 5 or 6 running plays, and 5 or 6 passing plays, including dropback and PA.
I agree with the few plays few formations philosophy. We do use adjustments and formations to create different looks, but for teaching purposes, having one or two formations allows us to install our base offense quickly, and the kids can focus on their technique and assigments from one alignment. We had two formations, 4 wide, and twins open. I think this helps us with being less predictable as well. Every time we break from our huddle, we can run anything in our offense. The defense has no formation tendancies to go on. True, they don't have to spend much time trying to figure out adjustments, but as an option team, they have to spend time figuring out how to defend our option game.
"You cannot expect greatness unless you sacrifice greatly."
Just my opinion and what we do (Not the Gospel!). Multiple formations and motions stresses the defense and makes them prepare and adjust more often. You can take a small volume of plays and make it look like an NFL playbook by varying formation and motion. This can be done by keeping your protection and blocking schemes intact (minimal adjustments), and making your adjustments with your skill players. This also puts the D in tough situations with mismatches. Depending on time and your players, you can add as many plays as they can handle. We also tag routes out of base plays that allows more offensive diversification. It really depends upon your team and what the kids can handle. This also allows you to break your own tendencies (ex. passing out of dominate run formations, etc.) to stay a step ahead of the D each week. Again, just what we do. The volume definitely changes from year to year based on ability/skill levels of kids.
Post by clipper coach on Feb 24, 2004 10:57:55 GMT
I believe in running an "offense", not just having plays. In other words, if you are going to run the option, then run the option (midline, triple, lead, belly, load, veer, etc...) If you are going to go to a run-n-shoot system, then have that be the kind of system you run. For example, we played a team this year that switched between a Pro, double tight full house, and 4/5 wide. Every series they rotated the formation. They only ran certain plays out of that formation, and consequently they were easy to defend. Now, you should use different formations to make defenses adjust, but do not change your identity. A lot of teams we face try to mix and match, and consequently they are not very good. The teams that run an offensive system are tough to beat because they all understand all of the scenarios associated with that type of offense. IN other words, multiple formations, same offensive scheme.