Post by pdow27 on Sept 22, 2002 21:57:32 GMT
Coach Campbell -
We are coming off a game in which we ran alot of one-back....threw the ball successfully against an even front running 1 techs and 4's with wide LB'ers. We were getting outside on zone toss and counter was also big. We were trying to run load option, but our FB was doing a lousy job blocking and we got little. However, we gained over 300 yds and scored 21 points and had two other deep penetrations with one ending in a fumble and the other in a missed field goal. This week, we face a team that for the last two weeks has been playing a base 52 front with some weak eagle...mostly 4 techniques and a 6 or a 9 on the TE. NOt sure how they will play our one-back as their first opponent ran some one-back, but defensively they played more even and got scorched and that is the only one-back team they have faced so far. I'm fairly certain how they will align vs. a 2 back scheme, but not too sure how they will defend one-back. My question is I think that our two back running game looks good against this 5-2 front, particularly outside veer, midline, iso, belly G and counter. Would it be unwise of me to emphasize a majority of two-back, tight end schemes into this week's game plan after coming off a week of successful one-back production? Appreciate your input. pdow.
We are coming off a game in which we ran alot of one-back....threw the ball successfully against an even front running 1 techs and 4's with wide LB'ers. We were getting outside on zone toss and counter was also big. We were trying to run load option, but our FB was doing a lousy job blocking and we got little. However, we gained over 300 yds and scored 21 points and had two other deep penetrations with one ending in a fumble and the other in a missed field goal. This week, we face a team that for the last two weeks has been playing a base 52 front with some weak eagle...mostly 4 techniques and a 6 or a 9 on the TE. NOt sure how they will play our one-back as their first opponent ran some one-back, but defensively they played more even and got scorched and that is the only one-back team they have faced so far. I'm fairly certain how they will align vs. a 2 back scheme, but not too sure how they will defend one-back. My question is I think that our two back running game looks good against this 5-2 front, particularly outside veer, midline, iso, belly G and counter. Would it be unwise of me to emphasize a majority of two-back, tight end schemes into this week's game plan after coming off a week of successful one-back production? Appreciate your input. pdow.
