Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I am a little confused regarding the rule, "don't pull a covered lineman." Is it not true that there will be times that you have to. Example-a shade 50, bst- 5, bsg- 3, center- 0, psg- uncovered, pst-5 and te-9. Running inside zone/dive to the te you are going to have to pull a covered backside lineman. I would love to hear from someone who knows more than I.....which would be a lot of people. I am running this out of a 2 back shot gun set, backs will cross and the right hb will take the backside end or we will use him to fake option to the open side with qb.
COACH, WE DID A LITTLE OF THIS THE LAST TWO YEARS. WE DID PULL COVERED LINEMEN. WE USED THE RB TO FILL ON DL , AND KEPT THE DE IN CHECK WITH BOOTLEG. I'M NOT SAYING YOU SHOULD DO THIS, IT WORKED FOR US, BUT WE WERE ONLY IN SHOTGUN ABOUT 20% OF THE TIME.
We are in shotgun 100% of the time, I use the QB as a RB and bring the 1 back in front for a ride and then block him back on the DE, or I will simply run an option back to the open side if the DE sucks down on the Tackles inside sift. It just seems to me that you are going to have to pull covered lineman in certain situations. Does anyone agree with this theory?
When I say "pull" all I am talking about is moving to the next down lineman. Again in the shade 50 with a 5, 3 and 0 on the backside to center. Do you Ace with the BSG and Center and leave the BST on the 3. To me that makes sense, but I need some other opinions.....other than run the other way.
We're looking at running the zone out of gun with one back. We'll use the QB threat of a boot to keep backside 5 tech honest. To answer your question, I'm looking at the blocking as: BST with a 5 tech: would be uncovered with a 5, so he reaches the 3 tech. BSG with a 3 tech: would be uncovered with a 3, so he combos with center on the 0 tech. Center with a 0 tech: would be covered, so he takes the 0 tech. with a combo from BSG. PSG with no tech: would be uncovered so he gets on track toward the 5 tech looking for a weakside slant or combo and climbing to 2nd level. PST with a 5 tech: would be covered so base blocks the 5 tech with possible combo from PSG. TE with 9 tech: Base block the 9. Hope this helps.
Also, with 2 backs in the gun, wondering would the "D" give you 8 in the box (5-3 with FS over top). They would make the cutback lane a little difficult with the Will Backer free, Just wondering too. CoachJD where are you?
Old Mule , You are correct by saying the D would give you 8 men in the box. Against the 5-3 you have to throw to loosen up the box, or go double tight. We have had a lot of success running double tight and the dive. We picked a lot up from Mount Union, "bring them in and run them out." In our Pro set with 2 back set vs. the 5-2 with a true 5 man front we will take the BST who has the 5 and pass set the Weak End leaving the 5 tech. DT on an island, again we will run the right HB across and he will block the DT or run him behind to fake the option back. This play will cause the BSLB to slow up and allow the BSG and Center a chance to really get a good combo. If we do kickout with the right HB on the DT it can really open a great cutback lane for our back, out of our off set I from the gun. I hope this helps
Holtz, Lost me on "pass set the weak 5". Who pass sets? the BST? Also, who takes the weak 3 tech.? and are you keeping the Will honest with the fake or is someone blocking him?
Sorry if I seem slow but it's some something that I perfected over the years. Thanks,
I coach in Minnesota. If we have two backs in the backfield with a TE we will see a 8 man box. We do a couple of different things to see if we can remove one defender or account for the extra defender.
To see if we can remove the defender we will flex our TE and have our split end and flanker in a twins set on the other side of the formation. (Twins Flex) If the defender does not cover the slot we will check to bubble screen, and most teams that play us know that so they will at least try to split the difference.
To account for the extra man we will either load the PS back to the alley player on playside of the zone play or we will have him carry out an option path away from the zone fake and after the QB hands the ball off they both carry out the option away from the zone. We have found that this opens up the cutback lane becasue the backside alley player will take pitch and the backside lber will either run to QB or slow read.
Sorry for the delay in my response.
JD
"Your work ethic determines your future" Boyd Eply
Old Mule, Vs. the true 5-2 you will not have a BS 3 tech. You will have a 5 tech on the BST, however the BSG will be uncovered. This is a rule for our O-Line, if the the BSG is uncovered and we have an over hang player.....in this case a DE we will pass set or fan the DE and leave the DT go on an island. We will run option to him or block him with the back coming across. This really screws up the read of the BSLB. Draw it up once and tell me what you think.We have found against the 5-2 teams that we play when our Tackle widens out their DT widens out as well. Of course we will game plan this, and we might find going double TE is a better choice than what I mentioned.
HOS, That's a good scheme, I can see it working. But I was originally drawing it up with the Shade 50 from the original post. Even with a true fifty, most teams that we face will reduce down on the weaksside giving us a DE in a 5 or wide 5, and a DT reduced down to a 3 tech. This answers some questions about the 2-back Gun set. I like the option off of the zone. We're basically a 4 wide gun set running the inside zone with a boot off of it. We also will look for the bubble screen. Probaly start looking at some 2-back sets this spring. Thanks.
Old Mule, I agree we will see that same look with the 50. 5, 3, center uncovered, 1,3,9 on the tight side. I don't worry about the dive vs. a defense that doesn't have a overhang. However the dive vs. and eagle front out of pro and con can cause problems as well as a 5, 3, on the bs 0, 5, 9 to the ps. Let me know what you would do against these defenses. Thanks HosHos
HosHos, Hope we're talking about the same thing, you're talking about a "dive" and I'm talking about an inside zone. Also, I call the 0, 2, 4, 6 tech as heads up, 1, 4i, 7 as inside shades, and 3, 5, 9 as outside shades. Not saying this is right, but so we're on the same page. But here goes anyway.
Vs. 5 & 3 back side, 0, 5,9 playside. TE base the 9, PST base the 5, PSG look for possible combo of the 5 tech and work to LB, OC & BSG combo 0 tech and LB, BST reach the 3 tech. Should be nice cutback lane.
Vs Eagle 5 & 3 backside, 0, 3, 6 playside Only difference would be PST uncovered working to LB or possible called to chip the 3 tech., the PSG would base base the 3 tech. Basically the PSG & PST exchange responsibilities.
Old Mule, We are on the same page indeed, you describe the scheme the exact way I want to run it. I have also heard of 2 ways to block the 44, BS-5tech-BST, 1teck-BSG, steck-PSG, PST and PSTE uncovered with a 7 tech. Do you feel the trey should take place or the deuce with the TE blocking down on the 7. We block it the second way I described but wondered if you had any thoughts one the first way.
Hos, I'd go with the TE - PST combo/climb on the 7 tech. The Center would base the strong shade with the PSG zone stepping then to the LB level. PSG could be called upon to chip the shade if needed. BST & BSG combo/climb the 1 tech.
First off I would formation them out of the 4-4 to run inside or just run an outside zone (stretch). Just a thought.
Coach, The way you are describing is the way we run he outside zone, however if our TE can't get inside the 7 then we will be forced to block them both the same way. Thanks
Coach Joe, On inside zone, t.The PSG would make the call if he feels he needs help on the 3. Also to clarify, this would only be called playside with a TE. Looking at a 9 tech with the PST uncovered. Sorry if I forgot that important bit of info.
If he have a raging 3 tech penetrating the B gap on outside zone, we just ask the PSG to cut him.
Old Mule, Do you thnk it is going to be tough for hte center to get the the strong sahde 3 teck on the PSG? We have had a lot of trouble with that shade so we decided to go with the Deuce instead of the Trey. This scheme has proved to be ver effective for us, when we run the outside zone we will combo with the 3 with the guard and center, most of the time the center will over take the tackle and the guard will climb the ladder to the lb. Tell me what you think everyone?
Old Mule I see what you are saying about the 3 tech, but I don't like to have the tackle combo with the guard on the inside zone because the tackle stepping backside will give the linebacker a clear read. If the 3 tech is giving you problems you can just always have the back cut it back adn just tell the guard to block out on the 3 tech. I like to have the tackle combo with the TE. Now if it is a 4i technique then the guard and tackle have to combo him.
On outside zone If the 3 tech is giving you problems I like to block down on him with the tackle and then pull the guard for the linebacker.