Post by Johnny Z on Oct 16, 2002 7:22:24 GMT
It's really common to hear people say that having a RB lead a WCO team in receptions is somehow a bad thing. The Packers, for instance, have had Ahman Green lead their team in receptions for two years in a row. They posted a 12 and 4 record and went 1 and 1 in the playoffs, yet, Green's leading the team in receptions was used as a justification for a wholesale change in WRs.
How do you guys see it? I don't think it's a problem if the WRs are also making significant contributions, too.
JZ
How do you guys see it? I don't think it's a problem if the WRs are also making significant contributions, too.
JZ
