Post by Lurker on May 9, 2004 21:19:20 GMT
Hello all! I've been lurking around the forum here lately thus the registered name "lurker". I'm looking for some insight for a new program. I seem to be behind the curve with most that post regularly so I might just be the encouragement for the lessor educated to join in. Is this a good thing?
I joined a team this past year (10-11 year old) that was an absolute mess. They had just come off of a no win season and lost the assistant who ran their offense. The year prior they had similar failure. I joined in just for the opportunity as I had been waiting for a couple of years. I thought I might gain some knowledge this past year assisting but I found that I was more qualified than any other on the team. Trust me that this was no great feature as the basic reception of the handoff was tought wrong. I trust that the regulars here would refer to them as "clueless".
My coaching experience was lacking but I had a grasp of the game from playing experience and a sound knowledge of the athletic ability of the age group. The athletic assessment and corresponding learning curve was acquired coaching baseball in that age group for the past 5 years. I was assigned the defense and I installed a number of different formations as I knew I would be essentially "testing the waters". I gave my input on offense to reduce the plays and formations than what would have been used otherwise. They had numerous offensive plays in different formations and the players were struggling to not trip over each other as they lined up. I repeatedly said "keep it simple stupid" and my ultimate suggestion was to keep the backfield in the I, twins, or single back. It was a learning experience but I felt that I contributed as this team won four games and that was four more games than they had won the prior two years combined.
The latest news is that I will be taking over this team. I have been stressed since the season end as I would like to install a single defense to actually teach the kids a basic philosophy that can adjust to what they will see on the field. Likewise I would like to install some of the suggestions that I've seen here on offense. Last year I eventually settled on a 62 defense as I found player size and speed severely lacking. It's very likely that I will end up with the player quality as I did last year. All totaled I think we may have had 5 players that the high school program will except in it's middle school program.
I've seen suggestions here made that I approach the high school program as to what defense to employ. They run a 3-5-3 and I have yet to see any junior high interest in the local youth program. As a matter of fact the high school coach has told me personally that he would rather see kids that haven't been tainted by any youth program (my son plays for him). Rather than approach him with my limited knowledge I would like a suggestion as to what youth defense may be employed that will lead into his program yet defend in youth football. The size and speed of my players will not sustain an adequate defense in a 3-5-3.
On the offensive side of the ball I'm at a loss as their seems to be too many options for my taste. I don't want to limit the players but I also cannot deny that they are limited. I'd rather the option be to attempt to perfect a limited amount of plays than to try everything for the sake of coaching genius. In other words I'm just looking for a start. The single wing and wing T have intrigued me but I have never liked that many men in the backfield. This age group just doesn't seem that coordinated. I'm considering sticking with what I know and limiting the team to the basic packages of the I and twin sets. I think I'd rather focus on blocking rather than trickery in the backfield. Please inform me if you consider my pessimism to be wrong.
Any suggestions are appreciated!!
I joined a team this past year (10-11 year old) that was an absolute mess. They had just come off of a no win season and lost the assistant who ran their offense. The year prior they had similar failure. I joined in just for the opportunity as I had been waiting for a couple of years. I thought I might gain some knowledge this past year assisting but I found that I was more qualified than any other on the team. Trust me that this was no great feature as the basic reception of the handoff was tought wrong. I trust that the regulars here would refer to them as "clueless".
My coaching experience was lacking but I had a grasp of the game from playing experience and a sound knowledge of the athletic ability of the age group. The athletic assessment and corresponding learning curve was acquired coaching baseball in that age group for the past 5 years. I was assigned the defense and I installed a number of different formations as I knew I would be essentially "testing the waters". I gave my input on offense to reduce the plays and formations than what would have been used otherwise. They had numerous offensive plays in different formations and the players were struggling to not trip over each other as they lined up. I repeatedly said "keep it simple stupid" and my ultimate suggestion was to keep the backfield in the I, twins, or single back. It was a learning experience but I felt that I contributed as this team won four games and that was four more games than they had won the prior two years combined.
The latest news is that I will be taking over this team. I have been stressed since the season end as I would like to install a single defense to actually teach the kids a basic philosophy that can adjust to what they will see on the field. Likewise I would like to install some of the suggestions that I've seen here on offense. Last year I eventually settled on a 62 defense as I found player size and speed severely lacking. It's very likely that I will end up with the player quality as I did last year. All totaled I think we may have had 5 players that the high school program will except in it's middle school program.
I've seen suggestions here made that I approach the high school program as to what defense to employ. They run a 3-5-3 and I have yet to see any junior high interest in the local youth program. As a matter of fact the high school coach has told me personally that he would rather see kids that haven't been tainted by any youth program (my son plays for him). Rather than approach him with my limited knowledge I would like a suggestion as to what youth defense may be employed that will lead into his program yet defend in youth football. The size and speed of my players will not sustain an adequate defense in a 3-5-3.
On the offensive side of the ball I'm at a loss as their seems to be too many options for my taste. I don't want to limit the players but I also cannot deny that they are limited. I'd rather the option be to attempt to perfect a limited amount of plays than to try everything for the sake of coaching genius. In other words I'm just looking for a start. The single wing and wing T have intrigued me but I have never liked that many men in the backfield. This age group just doesn't seem that coordinated. I'm considering sticking with what I know and limiting the team to the basic packages of the I and twin sets. I think I'd rather focus on blocking rather than trickery in the backfield. Please inform me if you consider my pessimism to be wrong.
Any suggestions are appreciated!!