Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
Due to graduation, we are short of linebackers and considering installing a 53 look. We are considering a DE in a 9, the DT in a 3, the Nose in a 0, the backside DT in a 3, and the backside DE in a 5. The Mike will be stacked behind the nose with opposite gap responsibility(of the nose) and the Sam will have the C gap in a 50 technique. Our Will backer will be our 8th man and take the C gap in a double tight look. The secondary will be in base cover 3. We like this front because it is able to cover our Mike backer and allow him to make tackles. My question is what are the pros and cons of this front. We see a lot of inside zone, iso, some trap and wing-t. We definitely need an eight man look because our league is over 80 percent run. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help in advance.
the only issue is it's lack of versatility - but that's all based on your comfort level. I've found it difficult to defend tripes / trips as well as disguising / altering coverages and / or fronts with the 53 personnel.
We are a 4-4 team and run ths same front from time to time. We don't stunt the MLB, buy we will stunt the OLB's and run line stunts with the three middle linemen. We will also play a form of 1/4's pattern-read(from this front) vs a pro or slot set.
Coach, I think you're on the right track particularly if you see 80% run with a lot of inside zone, iso, and trap. A couple comments:
(1) From a purely coaching standpoint, by moving from a 4-4 to the 5-3 double eagle front, in reality, all you have to do it to replace one ILB with a NG. A couple of shades change (weak 1 changes to a 3, strong 7 changes to a 9), but otherwise, you should be able to run your defense in much the same way as your old defense. This will be helpful, particularly if your coaching staff is comfortable with the 4-4.
(2) Against the run, I'd be a little concerned with susceptibility to the outside run to the strong side with the Sam in a 50 technique (you mentioned that you see wing-t, so the sweep might be tough to stop). You might think about stacking Sam behind your SE in a 90 technique, where he is in a better position to both force v. outside runs and fill v. off tackle runs. Also, as noted above, this would probably make it easier for your OLB coach to teach because it is pretty close the the OLB tech in the 4-4.
(3) Similarly, against the pass, the Sam might have a tough time getting to the flat from a 50 tech, so stacking him might help. Also because you're playing your WE in a 5 tech, I was wondering whether you wanted to have the capability to bring only a 4 man rush with your cover 3 (using the WE as the flat defender) or if you planned to generally play a 3 deep/3 underneath coverage with a 5 man rush. If you bring 5, I think you might have to incorporate some man techniques with your CB's (CB’s handle WR’s on 3 step flat routes) and OLB’s (OLB’s handle backs releasing on flat routes) because it might be tough for the OLB's to get to the flats with their tight alignment.
(4) Finally, with respect to spread sets, you might consult some of the 3-3 coaches on this board because their defense looks like a 5-3 when playing v. a tight or pro front, but has the flexibility to spread out with spread sets. Good Luck!
SW, I was just about to post that about the 33. I really like the ability we have to move our stingers to where we need them in order to cover up most anything. 6 in tackle box is a good run stopper, and 3 db's plus 2 stingers can cover the pass.