Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I really love the I formation and have always run the weakside iso but as I watch clinic tapes I see a lot of teams, especially in the pros, running the weakside zone play out of the I(leading the fullback on Will)?. Is there any difference in the plays?? Would a team need both plays??
Yeah I noticed that too and became curious. Most teams will check to a weakside run when they see the shade,5 look. Basically the fullback blocks will, and the guard and center combo to the Mike. and the backside zones. Gives you a frontside and backside option. I would say stick with with the weakside zone play.
Coach, have you ever attempted to run the ISO (B-Gap) and run and TAG Fold in addition to the FB coming through? I'm thinking if there is a 2 or 3 technique, and the PST is uncovered. The TE could step inside or chop the DE to prevent a slant.
This is something that I've wondered. It does get another body in the point of attack (we have 'nimble' guards). But I wonder if it creates too much of a crowd.
Just wanted to bounce an idea off you, and the others in the forum here.
I was watching some film of Nebraska (1994) running some Power-I Iso stuff; they were leading the two backs through the B.
Just seemed like a different adjustment to go with a Fold-TAG game to run it from the regular or offset I formation. I like only having a few plays but different blocking schemes to change the mix for the DL/LB. We've found we can pick on a guy ('best player') by double teaming, trapping etc... so he doesn't know which way to go, or what to expect.
With tight line splits being prevalant in football - sometimes leading too many men thru the hole results in running into the backside of your own men (a "log-jam").
Talk to NFL running backs. Many don't like an "I" fullback in front of them because it obscures their reads of the defense (for example - in option running - they MIGHT key the helmet of the DLM at the POA for their cut). They can't SEE with too many people in front of them.
Back in the mid 80's - the old "NFL Magazine" interviewed the top 10 RB's in the NFL, & ALL 10 of them said that they didn't want a 6'4 250 LB "I" fullback in front of them. An offset "I" is better! OR - the FB ("H" as Gibbs calls him) coming in motion to kick or lead from a slotted or wing position. RB's like Riggins, Eric Dickerson, Barry Sanders, ETC. "didn't want lead backs directly in front of them" (quoting from the article).
I can see with tight line splits this would be a problem!!!!
I have the pleasure of coaching with a few people who have been around coaching for a LONG time (we're talking HC's in the 1950's)... we tend to shy away from the tighter splits unless we're running pitches. We'll vary our splits constantly. We find great value in spreading out the defensive front, and if they don't spread.... then we've often got some nice angles to run over the TE area.
We call the toe to toe teams 'rollerball'. Personally, I'm not fond of it. Just isn't anything strategic to me about lining 7-8 guys up toe to toe and wedge blocking it. Its just my opinion though, and I mean no disrespect to those that do it. That way can work and work effectively... it just isn't my cup of tea.
Part of this comes from the fact that Canadian Fields are 110 yds by 65 yds wide (20yd endzones too, eh!), so you always have a good portion of room to the sideline. We love to throw different passes to the flats (like curl/flat combos). The other part is that with 3 downs, you need to open it up a little more than the '3 yds and a cloud of dust' philosophy; to really be effective a 1st down run has to gain around 5 yds.
We are talking about two different kinds of football. I stress the Counter; Power-Oh; Inside Zone; Outside Zone. You CANNOT run these plays effectively with more than a 24" split. Most NFL teams (& Division I colleges) that feature these plays split 12"; 18" 24" etc. Joe Bugel likes 14"!
You can't zone with a man playside with a big split. You cannot block down vs penetrators in the counter/power game with big splits. To paraphrase Alex Gibbs (GREAT LINE COACH of the Broncos in 2 Super Bowls) - "big splits only get you BIG PENETRATION by the defense"!!!!!!!
Yes in some aspects we are talking a little different type of football, but not totally different... the rules are different but some of the same plays are stressed.
Even though the field ends up being wider, we've also got the defense giving up 1 FULL yard off the nose of the ball. So the separation allows OL here to move more laterally, and we can make up and extra 12". We did some studying on slow-mo film this year and found that while in the US alot of the contact occurs on the 2nd step... most of ours is on the 3rd. So... while we're widening out a little... we're also getting that back because the defense needs to travel that much further, and everyone has 1 extra step.
Several Canadian teams (college and pro) successfully run zone schemes with 2 foot splits and some will widen. Some college coaches here did work in the early 90's with Nebraska for some seasons, and were successfully able to adapt and run that offense and set records.(Nebraska had a standard 24" split, and would widen a little on Inside Zone... and they were VERY successful -- Tenopir doesn't see the split as a major factor) . That extra yard makes a big difference because contact occurs later, and it allows more distance to be covered on down blocks. A great example is a simple FB trap. The teams that run it extremely successfully here have the trapping guard actually pull INTO the LOS because pulling straight messes the angle (Similar things happen with a counter trey - might have to adjust depths and angles)
Sorry if I offended you coach, I didn't mean to at all! You've really been a great help to me (and others I am sure).... and We appreciate it very very much! I'm not saying anyone's wrong or right. I'm just doing what alot of coaches up here do... we take what we see, synthesize it, and adapt it to our systems, players, and the differences in our game -- and then go out and make it work.
I'm not the least offended! Everybody must do what they think is best. The BIG trend is to have the O-Line off the ball as much as possible in order to zone better, cut off penetration, pass protect, pull, etc. D-Lines HUG the ball - & most are into penetration now. Joe Gibbs said in the paper a few days ago that the MAJOR difference he sees after a 11-12 year absence in the NFL is that defenses are putting more defenders in the "box", hugging the LOS; & COMING!!!!!
Our O-Line GENERALLY makes contact on the second step, because that is your POWER step. It is a race between the O-Line & defense to see if O-Lineman can GET THE SECOND STEP DOWN BEFORE HE IS STALEMATED by DLM. Defenses are coached NOT to allow the O-Line to get the second step down, let alone a third!
Nebraska's 24" splits are fine. Remember I said in my last post that different O-Line coaches vary between 12" & 24". I prefer Guards at 12" or 18"; Tackles at 18" & TE at 24". SOMETIMES I think THAT is too much. I've coached the Redskins offense since 1981, & I can guarentee you that I don't want to zone block or gap down (Counter-Gap) with MORE than 24"!
See the blocking technique used by the Redskins on a BASE/DRIVE block below: If you can accomplish this, you have it made!
1. Explode out. 2. Short first step (1/2 way to fingers of down hand; knee rolls over toe – NOT behind). 3. Back flat. 4. Bull neck. 5. Proper aiming point (aim face at throat of DLM; base of #’s of LB). Look the block in. 6. Second step MUST be beyond first step to win. Make contact on second step (most important step). Hit 1 yard through defender. 7. Whip the arms. 8. Blocking surface (drive the elbows inside & make contact with a triangle of hat & hands (thumbs up) to a lockout; contact the short ribs & “lift him out of his socks” on a 45 degree angle with fork lift motion). 9. Shoot the hips (unlock the power). 10. Driving steps. 11. Feet under you – good base. 12. Maintain contact. 13. 2nd & 3rd effort.
QUESTION: When do you whip the defender? ANSWER: When he tries to escape the block – you come alive and finish (STAY ON BLOCK).
We have 5,1,3,9 across the front with the backers in the b,a, and c gaps.
If I call an ISO right everyone would zone right, and the player that is to the inside of the bubble (first totally empty hole) would be the center... he would zone block to the left (opposite the call).
If we ISO left, everyone would zone left, inside of the bubble would be the PSG, he would zone block opposite (right) and double the playside DT to possible second level.
This is from me doodling. I have not switched to zone blocking yet. Has anyone done this or seen this done? It seems like it may work. It has zone blocking with an ISO being run at the playside backer, but allows for a possible cutback.
If you have the players to get it done the way you have schemed it, and even though a lit bit experimental, just remember all GOOD coaches are good "doodlers" !
J.C.Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE