Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
From the defensive point of view I like when people try to run the option to the 3 tech(outside shade of the gaurd) I believe that if the gaurd reaches the DT this causes the the string out effect by the tackle trying to regain out side leverage, which puts the tackle in position to catch the QB. But if the OT blocks down to the DT and they option off the DE my middle backer is free. From an offesive point of view, do you ever try to run option to the 3 tech.
Coach Campbell--I am a new head coach looking for a little direction regarding offense. I have always been an option coach and I know how to run it. All the programs I served as an assistant in were proficient option/power running teams. Now as a head coach I find our team has had trouble playing "monster ball" against bigger teams. We are by far the smallest team in our league and running the ball even with the option is tough since we have all we can do just to get stalemates on the line--sometimes even with double teams. I have been looking at the spread and we tinkered with it some last year with a fair amount of success I am still learning about the scheme so I did not know how to push the buttons so to speak. Our school has alot of "basketball guys" wide reciever types and small OLM. I can still run a fair amount of speed option and get option looks with the backside read by the QB running a "Northwestern" style spread. Problem is this: I do not want to change offenses every year. I want some consistancy. That is something I have noticed in the successful programs I have worked with...things get tweaked from year to year but they are consistant in the overall scheme. Also most of our sophomores play significant back-up roles on the varsity and so we need to be running the same scheme all through the program. I found last year our 10th grade and 9th grade teams could not run the spread with much effeciency and relied alot on the option. Obviously the biggest fault of our program is strength training was non-existant 3 years ago when I took over, now the kids are just getting into it. I am not looking for "the" answer here, but just some advice...some things to think about and consider as I get ready this summer.
Wise men talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something.---Plato
Coach Campbell is right about the midline to a 3 techniqe. That play is there all day. Also, if you are going to run the triple option to the tight end side, we double-team the 3 technique and bring out TE down on the middle backer; also, we run the bone, so we bring out playside HB up to that backer to get a double team on him as well (vs. a 4-4). Or, we could combo the DT to the LB and arc-release the TE.
We only run the inside veer to a 3 tech if there is no outside invert...our basic rule is to run the inside veer and the freeze option to the tighter defensive tackle...run midline to the wider tackle...run the lead (load) option to a reduced 5/4 tech. Works well...need to check DT's, Inverts, and Number Leverage. Have a nice weekend...pdow
We have been able to run straight Option to the 3t by simply Doubling to Scoop with the PSG & PST. With a double team to the 3t and taking the rules of a double team for us which is to assure the double team and then 1, catch the MLB in the"wash" or 2, the PST will scoop to the MLB. The 3rd rule of "two-hands -two eyes" for us in the double team makes it nearly impossible for the 3t to ever effect our scheme. In fact I as a line coach find it easier to block a 3t with Option then a 3t with Blast.
Post by Dublin Ireland on Jun 17, 2004 7:36:45 GMT
I've been figuring out how to run the ISV vs a 3 tech and all the above suggestions are confirming what I was thinking.
One thing, though. What exactly is an invert? Is it something do do with a LB or DL lined up outside the TE (if we're running strongside)
I am playing a match on Sunday in which I expect to be seeing a 3 tech and a variety of alignments from LBs and DLs outside the POA, and I'd like to know what the definition of invert is so I can watch for that.
From what I understand or what we call an Invert is when the Safeties, both Free & Strong Attack the alley from a cover 2 look and assume Pitch or QB responsibility. The Invert is dictated by the action of the QB or the strength of the formation. In this case of Inverting safties the best thing to get them out of this is Counter option, or playaction with Option because they will be in a down hill attack on running downs and will most likley find themselves in a weak cover 3 and are exposed in the backside post or playside flats. If this helps good luck Sunday.
An invert would be the SS alignment in a cover 3 structure....the curl flat defender...the support or contain OLB...typically aligned 5 yds deep and outside the defensive end...the typical outside LB'er. So therefore, if we were to align in a trips formation (3x1) and check the open receiver side and we see a 3 tech but with no invert (OLB), we'd run the option that way. pdow
One other scheme that is possible I learned from Campbellville U in KY. They use a "G" scheme, pulling the PSG to log the EMLOS. The DT blocks down on the 3 tech, and the TE inside releases and blocks the middle/inside backer. The PSG pulls to logs the DE. The QB reverses out and fakes a Wing T type belly play, FB will track outside to the alley player, and QB reads Sam/OLB for pitch. CB is stalked by Z.