Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
We are looking at modifying our playbook a little next year. We are very happy with the offense we are currently running but we feel that we are a little easy to prepare for, in that we don't run much to the weakside. We are very strong side dominant.
Currently our offense is based on the belly series that you have probably seen in Lochness's posts. We got many of our ideas from him. This series is really designed to go to either a tight end or wing. We haven't really been able to run it to the open side much at all. We also run lead either way sometimes with a g scheme. Actually our best open side play. We also run midline and load.
We would like to add the inside veer to our arsenal, but our coaches feel that we try to do too much already. One train of though right now is to remove the load and add inside veer to give us more plays to the weak side. Does anyone have any ideas or reasons for or against this idea? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
BTW, we see mostly 4-4 stack, 5-2 monster, and a little 5-3. All 8 man fronts. Thanks for your time.
The inside veer is a great play. However there are a number of things you should consider. 1. The QB Read: The Qb will have to practice a good portion of his time reading the inside veer. It is something he may have to do everyday before and after practice. 2. The FB: If you have an average FB who can block but who may not be a great runner then reconsider. The FB is the key to the Veer in my opinion. 3. The O-Line: The blocking scheme for the inside veer is difficult to add if you are just going to run the Veer as another weapon.The inside Veer or the Veer offense is just that, an Offense. With the Veer in my experience you have to be very dedicated to the scheme and the startegy of the Veer. If you use it sparingly and only glaze over the Scheme you will only hurt yourselves. However if you would like to run a Veer-style play you can use a simple Veer Call. The footwork and the blocking should be basically the Veer but to change it or make it a little easier to swallow you can simply tell the offense when the FB will get the Ball and when the Qb & TB will run Option. Simply Call " Right Veer Give ( FB) and have the Qb and TB carry out the fake. The O-line can just block the play like a FB Dive. Then Call Right Veer Option. Then simply carry out the mesh with the FB and have the QB dissconnect and carry out an Option w/ the TB. The Line can block the Option rules. The Inside Veer is a great play but even better Offense and when you can make a commitment to it it can become a very effective weapon. ~Good Luck
coach, i was wondering if you were in traditional wing t type of formations. your post made it sound like you might be. perhaps tight/end wing to one side and halfback behind the tackle to the other? when we were a wing t school, we alos relied heavily on the belly. to break things up we would run dive to the open side. it was predetermined give. we turned the DE loose, tackle inside release to first backer inside- guard and center would combo the shade nose to the MLB. halfback dove straight ahead. QB opens at three o'clock and meets the halfback at the mesh. worked real well for us. kept the defense on their heels and made them weaken the strong side of their defense-which we then attacked.
bpolson, I don't think I would take away the load option from the playbook, It can be an effective play to the open side the other thing to remember is that the inside veer can be run to the TE as well . That ought to give a threat to the defense of making uyou a more dimensional team.
Coach, If you are running midline then you are already spending time with mesh and reading mechanics. i think you could add an additonal 10 minutes working on the inside veer and you would benefit greatly ffrom it. The blocking is probably very similar to the lead you said you run. Other than the midline, all the plays you listed do not take much time for the skilled kids to get good at or rep. IMHO the inside veer is the best open side play there is. If you are as strong side oriented as you say, your opponent know that as well. Throw something out of the book and become more diversified. I have never like lead or load option because the lb are not held by any dive fake. They get full flow immediately after teh snap. If you get decent at the veer, they will play you honest to the tight side and you can do more with less plays.
Coach, I'm with mg. I do like the lead and load option, however, and think it is a great change up to the open side. But, the ISV is the way to go most consistently, in my opinion. Coaching point: as a QB/HC I always teach the QB to think "pitch quick" to the open side, no matter what option your runnning. If he isn't giving, have him get it on the perimeter ASAP. Teaching him the two reads on the inside veer to the strong side first, makes it a simple progression to the outside veer single read on the EMLOS. I think you are making a sound decision to implement the ISV. Good Luck.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Coach, I didn't realize or just glanced over it to quickly, that you ran the Midline. Hell the midline is a quciker read and in camparison to the ISV the midline is harder. I really think if you want to assure a balanced attack stay with the Midline, the ISV and maybe even add a Outside Veer. I would hang on to the Load Option just to maintain the perimeter. Without the fake the LB does attack down hill but if you can show the counter-option that would slow the LB's down. Any play that slows the LB's downhill will loosen up the pressure on the Load.
I am a load fan so let me stick up for it here. If you want to hold the backers for a second, have your fb step with his play side foot to the line on his first step his next step will be with the other foot and then plant and take an angle at the te or tackle's butt. this gives the backers the impression that the fb may get the ball on a dive, like the veer. this works even better if the qb flashes the ball as he opens.
tcamp, not being contentious now, just asking as a point of interest, but wouldn't the technique you suggest with the FB make him "late" to his load point?
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Tiger One, no because I am usually loding the free, I use Coach Campbell's technique he talks about in his manuals. I have also run buck sweep in the past with this method, having the fb log or kick out the end. The 1st time I heard about it was on a wing t video, the coach called it "stove pipe" blocking he used it instead of pulling the guard. If the fullback is slow I wouldn;t try but if he has good feet you may want to toy the idea. I had my back field work on it one day after workouts because I was skeptical, but it worked.
Last year we were exclusively an I team. We may incorporate some more split backs this year to add more of a quick hit into the line potential.
All coaches,
Thanks for the input gentlemen. I have been leaning towards adding the ISV to the open side to balance us out a little more and you have given me some valuable advice. There is one team in particular for whom we are looking to run this against and they are the first team that we play next year.
another question that I have. What gives the inside veer to the open side trouble? I like to have all my ducks in a row.