Post by bhanna on Oct 8, 2004 13:55:26 GMT
Having been in both systems and seeing on their own how powerful they can be...how much more difficult would it be to stop a spread/option offense? Which of the two unique offenses would require the least time to develop into a real threat, and lastly, can the line coach come up with simple enough rules to make the combo offense work?
I would like to do this, but keep the offense to a maximum of 12 formations(rt/lt), 12 running plays and 8 pass protections, including screens and special plays. I would like to have even distribution between the sets and the run to pass ratio...so posts that are just pro-spread or pro-option get thrown out, while those willing to open the mind to the possibilities will be more closely read!(lol)
In other words, can Purdue be welded to AFA and form a cohesive offensive system? :beer;:clock;
I would like to do this, but keep the offense to a maximum of 12 formations(rt/lt), 12 running plays and 8 pass protections, including screens and special plays. I would like to have even distribution between the sets and the run to pass ratio...so posts that are just pro-spread or pro-option get thrown out, while those willing to open the mind to the possibilities will be more closely read!(lol)
In other words, can Purdue be welded to AFA and form a cohesive offensive system? :beer;:clock;