Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
could you coaches give me some pros and cons of each system...we have run both and are trying to decide which system we are going to stick with for the long run...our situation is that we are athletically challenged...we do not have great depth at skill positions and our kids have to learn several spots to give us added depth...we feel like the I might be easier for kids to learn multiple positions...
"It's like novocain. Just give it time, it always works!"
Coach, Have run both the bone and the "I" with success over a long coaching career. My personal preference is the I. But, your statement that you don't have many real skill posiiton guys, would make that choice applicable for you as well. I ran the bone on the HS level and no matter what folks tell you, you have to have a great QB, big backs, and linemen that are flat strong and quick in order to be successful. Any good bone team is going to run complimentary power plays, as well as, the triple,ISV,OSV,etc. They will align in double tights and smack it down your throat with wham action, power, counters, Iso's, etc. and then have the scat back that can beat you all night long on the perimeters with the outside veer and power sweeps. The good I teams are going to feature a great TB over the power house FB as in the bone. It becomes a personal preference thing, actually, but I just like the I. A bone team, true option team, is only going to throw the ball 10 times a game or so. If you are light in the skill department, that would make you think bone. But, 90 % of all options that break big, break in the outer one third of the field and your wideouts have the most crucial blocks of them all, imo. Finding receivers who want to block first of all, and then that can be trained to stalk properly is also a challenge. Never met a receiver in my life who really liked to stalk block! Had one once who loved to crack, but not stalk. I've coached kids who are big name receivers in the NFL today, (Rod Gardner of the Redskins, Jabar Gaffney of the Texans) and are great receivers and football players in general. But, neither liked to block. At any rate, you will end up going in the way you feel best, just remember to build your choice around those guys who will be doing the playing and their strengths, as well as, their weaknesses. Good luck in the process. Where do you coach, and at what level?
JC
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Post by optionfootball on Nov 1, 2004 11:23:18 GMT
I coach in Missouri at a class 2 high school...we have been a flexbone team the past few years...last year we had that one exceptional back you mentioned in your post, so we went to the I and he broke the single season rushing record for our school...we started this year in the I but with out that one great kid, we were having trouble moving the ball...we went back to the flexbone and saw some improvement but not a whole lot...we are a really young team this year and will have twenty of our twenty two starters back for next year...it is not that we don't have any athletes, we just don't have a stable full...after going back to the flexbone this year, we had several injuries to backs and it has put us in a bind depth wise...my thinking was that in the I we would have more depth needing only two backs as oppossed to three in the bone...also, without all the motion and what not, it would be easier for a kid to learn multiple spots (receiver and tailback).
"It's like novocain. Just give it time, it always works!"
Coach, I guess I didn't give a complete thought, but that is it in a nutshell, in the I you have only 2 backs verses the 3 in the bone. As the bone is a power game, as well as, option game, you need those big tough backs to power it up in there. In the I, your going to turn that tailback loose on the outside, your going to be throwing much more, etc. and it is just easier on your limited personnel. The bone is going to get you beat up without the big, strong, physical backs to keep hammering it in there all night long. I say this from experience and it sounds like you have experienced the same thing. IMO, your right on the money with your appraisal of it being easier to teach a kid the spots.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE