Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
We have them read FB to near Guard. The FB takes them to the near guard. If the guard pulls across the center, then we redirect and fill for trap in the opposite a gap.
How do you compensate for a false key by the near guard with that technique? It just occured to me that that is a very distinct possibility. Just curious as to how you would adjust.
JC
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Because we have been so effective running downhill with the LB's in the 3-3 stack, teams have tried some false pulls and run the ball where they have pulled.
The Backside stacked LB would normally fill the B gap 1st for any counters, the nose always plays backside A (in other words, he gets reached). The Mike plays frontside A of any pulling guard and the Stacked LB strong plays B gap. The 5 technique squeezes the Tackle and spills the trapper. If he gets doubled we try to stay low and not give ground. The Strong OLB reads TE. If TE doubles down, he replaces the TE and attacks the pulling guard at the thighboard spilling it east -west. The FS runs the alley along with the stacked LB to run it down.
For example. if we are false pulled strong, we still have the A gap weak covered with the nose, the B gap covered by the weak stacked backer and the C gap covered with the 5 technique. The D gap is covered by the weak outside LB.
We always game plan to have all the gaps covered so we are always sound.
We call the near guard the side the FB tracks. If he tracks to the A gap strong, we call the guard on the strongside the 'near guard'. If the FB tracks to the side of the weakside guard, we would call him the 'near guard'. We read the 'near guard ' for pull away from the flow for trap.
I hope you can help me with this. We also employ a 52 and 53 with our DT's over the OT's. I am struggling with either teaching the DT's to play 1 gap or 2??
I have been teaching them to play 2 gap, by attacking the man over them and then reading the play, fight thru pressure and fill the gap they are trying to run to.
It really depends on what kind of kids you have. Two gap looks good on paper but in reality it takes a strong athletic kid to pull it off. We have a team in the area that plays a 4-3 and they are successful at two gapping their 2 techniques. Year in and year out they put two kids there that bench 325+ and can run like a LB. Those kids can physically whip most kids they face and they get away with it because they are strong, athletic and they are well coached.
I prefer to have my kids anchor a gap and keep the LB's clean so the LB's can run to the ball. You have to develop lineman to fit your philosophy or fit your kids to a system they can do. Only you can determine that because you know what you will see in your district.
Post by Coach Nicholson on Dec 9, 2004 18:39:22 GMT
hang50
I have some questions about having your D lineman anchor one gap.
Lets say your tackle is in a 3 (outside of guard) and his job is to play B gap. If your tackle feels the guard trying to push him away from the play does the tackle immediatly fight across the guards face and get to the play or does he hold down his gap until the ball has reached the LOS? We have almost always had our D lineman read the man across from them while playing 2 gaps. This is why I am unsure about the technique of D lineman playing 1 gap.
We make sure each gap is accounted for. Ideally we want to fight pressure, disengage and make the tackle with the D-Line. Against weaker teams we can do this consistently. Against better teams this gets tougher. Lineman do a better job of staying with blocks and in most cases they match up physically. We always tell them to fight pressure, disengage to make the tackle but their main responsibility is to keep the LB's free and anchor their gap. If we get them anchoring their gap, we feel the LB's will make all the plays. All defenses are designed for the D-line to keep the 2nd level clear so the LB's can fill where needed.
To two gap, you need physically superior athletes to consistently whip their opponents up front. One team in our area has this and they are big, strong and fast. They consistently get kids that bench in the 350+ range at those positions.
We make sure that our kids know that their gap will move. If a kid is in a 3 tech and is being blocked out, his gap is moving and he must drive through the blocker and put his gap back where it belongs. Does that make sense? I agree with hang that it is very difficult for kids to be 2 gap players. In very rare cases do we ask a kid to be a 2 gap player. We don't have any general times that we play 2 gap. When we do it...it is because of a gameplan issue that we have scouted and we think we can get away with it.
Post by Coach Nicholson on Dec 12, 2004 17:17:01 GMT
dlo
So if your 3 tech realizes the play is going away from him do you want him fighting across the guys face in order to get to the ball or do you want him to just play his gap no matter what? I was thinking that I should have the 3 tech hold his gap until he is completely sure the play isnt coming to his gap and then fight through the pressure to get to the play.
Honestly, it depends on our scout. We have some opponents where we drill the kids to sit in their gaps. We have other opponents that we "blow it up" and will cross the blockers face. Are they a counter team? Does FB lead you to the ball? Will they block your technique when they counter?
I think in reality if you teach a kid to fight across the blocker in that situation, the best thing that happens is that they stay in the gap that they should.
It may also depend on if you are a penatration defense or not. Our NG in our base front is our only two gap player but all three interior lineman and our ends have a man then gap responsibility. If they penetrate to far into their gap without making contact, that leaves a blocker free to the second level and any counter or windback running teams will present a problem plus our ILBs will be open for cutback blocks. We tell our lineman they may only penetrate a yard and half before escaping, meaning they must explode (hat and hands), feel pressure, but maintain leverage and be accountable in their gap . The point is, we believe that 1 gap players who make contact with the man in front and play off of it into a gap are better on the perimeter (5-TECH) in our base front but your entire front should have a man then gap responsibility. This leaves your ILBs and Safeties to attack at 45s and pursue effectively; at least that is what works for our players and the talent we have. It is also proficent for the types of offenses we see in our league
I think that your Mike backer keys should also be dependent largely on the offense that you are playing against. Usually, our mike reads FB to the guard on the side of the formation that the FB runs to. This is pretty effective against teams that run the I or some type of formation where there is a lot of misdirection and pulling linemen.
However, we play against a lot of teams that run the 'Bone and don't pull linemen. If you are telling your mike to read FB-to-guard, your Mike is going to miss most of the misdirection plays that are run out of the 'Bone, especially the lead trap (FB goes right, QB fakes handoff to FB, reverses out and gives the ball to the right halfback who then follows the left halfback off-guard or off-tackle.
In this scenario, you willy and sam backer/SS are crucial. We have our outside guys read near back to far back. If the near back goes right, the outside backers read step right. After the read step, they find the far back. If the far back also goes right, the backers will work their normal pursuit angles. If the near back goes right, but the far back countersteps left, that backer will stay home and wait for the counter coming back at him.
We have tried to get our LBs to read linemen, but not with a lot of success. When I was in college, our linebackers coach taught his guys to read either the tackle or tight end to the tailback or near back. We have tried that at the high school level. I think what it comes down to is that most high school offensive linemen and tight ends simply don't have good enough technique to give an OLB a good read. Along the same lines, our LB coach tried to get his Mike to read the center's block. A good idea conceptually, but not practically.
The other important concept that many high school LBs struggle with is depth. I can't tell you how many times I have seen a high school LB playing 2 yards off of the ball. Why bother? If you are going to play that shallow you might as well be a down lineman. When you play that shallow, one wrong step, and you are completely out of the play. By getting back 4 or 5 yards, you are getting into a position where you can see things developing in front of you.
Interestingly, some of the Wing-T teams in our conference have switched things up a bit to confuse the Mike LBs who have been coached to read FB-to-guard. These teams have started to pull the tackle, tight end, or even the wingback instead of the guard.
Personally, I love the 5-2/5-3 defense. I know that it is old and not very fancy, but it works. The last three years, we have started the season trying a new defense (3-4 this season, 4-4 a year ago, 3-4 the previous year). In each of those seasons, we have always come back to Ol' Reliable, the 5-2/5-3 and had a lot of success with it.