Installing Today’s Hybrid Pistol Offense Run & Pass from Top to Bottom
This manual provides you with the full offensive line, receiver, and quarterback mechanics for installing each offensive play presented. Coach Campbell has left no stone unturned for implementing today’s Pistol Offense into your program.
I have always had my Corners align inside a wide-out in Cover 3. I know that some people prefer to align their Corners on the outside. Either way the job of the corner is to play the deep third. I have aligned with an inside position to discourage the slant and other inside routes, but given the fact that I don't want them to jump inside routes and get beat on a double move I'm considering the change. I'd like to know which way you align your corners and why.
we USED to align OUTSIDE out of fear of getting pinned inside on perimeter runs, but we moved our guys INSIDE last year as we can do ALOT more out of it. We prefer it because we feel it forces any deep throw to have to be the 15 yard drop out (hard throw for any HS / college QB to make) and it allows us the freedom of disguising our looks a little easier (C2 / C1 / etc).....
Cover 3 zone is the only true zone look that I employ. I do not utilize it a great deal, as I much prefer our combo cover schemes of combining man and zone. For years I always sat the CB's off on the outside shoulder ( 5-7 yds. on the back side, 7-9 on the front side) whenever we were in cover 3. 10 years ago, as everyone else was doing the same thing at that time, I went along with the crowd. One day at practice a thought occured to me that it was plain foolish to play it that way. Your always getting beaten on the inside slants, curls, etc. by playing outside leverage. I decided that whenever we were in cover 3, I would sit the CB's back at the same distances but with inside leverage and try to discourge the wideouts by allowing them not to run anything other than real short under routes inside, and as with hard man under technique force them to run the go or the fade routes. It allows the basic concept of deep thirds to be employed by the CB's but really in essence they are playing loose man. If they try to run short undrneath, they are then the responsibility of the SS or the OLBS and you have them covered in either choice they make. Just my way, but it has been good for me and I have never changed it since first giving it a go. Try it and see how it works for you.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
Thank you all for the thoughts. Keep them coming. We read the QB/Ball first and receivers second. How do you key out your Corners and FS? Again, my first worry is getting beat deep. At what point do you go ahead and come up and short routes, slants, outs, etc? After getting burned a few times this season we finally said that our DBs were not to come up until the ball has left the QB's hand. D-linemen were to get their hands up and Linebackers were to get into the lanes. Yet, I still feel that we should be able to key it out so that we can come up quicker than we are without getting burned. Thoughts?
Are you going to play cover 3 the majority of the time? If so, I think most people go to inside shade because it is otherwise fairly easy to complete the slant, curl, hitch, etc (at least in theory) if you sit off and outside. If you're going to play inside, you might as well be playing man, in my opinion. I believe cover 3 should be a very "safe" coverage vs the deep ball. I like my corners to be able to turn their backs to the sideline and keep the QB and receivers in sight in cover 3. If you align the OLB or SS correctly, it makes those short passes not quite as easy to execute. I like to blitz and play man and cover 2. I do like to have a cover 3, especially when we don't want to give up the deep ball. Not sure if I actually added anything.
I'm actually a Man-Free fan but I like to have Cover 3 in place. I'm in a small school and only an injury or two away from having to play kids who are not good man coverage players so Cover 3 is a good backup. When I first took over as D-Coordinator I was blessed to have extremely good coverage players. I could lock on constantly and allow the front to put pressure on the QB. We had just under 30 interceptions and 36 sacks in 12 games that year so you can about imagine how big my head got. As it turned out, the kids we had could excell at anything we threw at them and cover up mistakes well. The kids we have now are nice athletes but we simply can't lock on and cut loose. Our coverages need to be better disciplined/keyed out. After getting burned several times this year in Cover 1 I made the decision to sit back in 3 deep until we could improve our coverage discipline. We ended up picking quite a few balls to finish the season and didn't get burned at all. What I didn't like is that we stayed so deep that we virtually had no secondary run support. I have on order some videos on reading in the first 3 steps. I want to make sure that we are playing the pass first yet I also want to make sure we come up when we get the appropriate reads.
Coach, The real answer, imo, is to let your CB's play pass 100% and formation your SAFTIES to play run support and do the tackling, as well as, covering under and short routes. That is why 11 years ago now, I went to the 4-2-5 (Dallas 42) for that very purpose. By virtue of having twin SS's at 1 yd deep and 3-5 yds wide off the TE and backside tackle who have 3 assignments on every play( contain on the sweep, pitch on the option and flats on the pass) if our Corners get run off it does not hurt us one bit verses a run! The PRIMARY job of any CB is pass coverage, not run support. So, why not formation defensively to allow him to do his primary job? But, if you have 2 LB's and 2 SS's who can play, your 2 CB's and your FS can be freed up to play pass without the added burden of run support. Once the RB comes across the LOS, then your secondary is free to come up and ASSIST the PRIMARY tacklers who are your LB's and SS's, as a passing threat no longer exists. Just my way, but it works real well.
Coach Easton
J.C. EASTON<BR>HEAD COACH<BR>GA TIGERS FOOTBALL<BR>PROFESSIONAL MINOR LEAGUE
In my opinion, Cover 3 is really almost a prevent type coverage. If you're main objective is not to get beat deep, and you don't have athletes with superior speed at the corners, and I mean superior, you must have a defensive scheme that puts the responsibility for run on the eight man front. The short passing game must also be covered by the LBs and SS. Why would you expect players whose responsibility is not to give up the "home run" pass to have a different one on a running play. These guys need to stay back and make open field tackles on plays that break out of the eight man box and prevent the "home run" run. You can't have it both ways or you'll potentially get burned by play action.
What you can do to confuse an offense is use Cloud/Sky rotations which assign either the corner (cloud) or strong safety (sky) as the flat and run support player. This can sometimes cause confusion for the blocking schemes and QB pass reads. You can also disguise your Cover 3 from this with a Cover 2 shell. There is no additional teaching besides a formation or alignment as the base responsibilities are the same, just from a different look. Also, if you are having problems with the slant route, I love the sky rotation out of the cover 2 shell where the corner bails while the safety robs the weakside slant route. Receivers start to get those alligator arms once they start worrying about being whacked by that guy and the QBs rarely look for him.